...dafuq? Because some people at Valve, probably not the HL team, and another studio made other games, they've all given up on single player altogether?Falsename said:Looking at it objectively, we see a game that was slow to release from the very beginning, and while it was award winning and fantastic I can't help but wonder if Valve dragged their feet for a reason. Like a kid who just doesn't wanna do the damn dishes(!), Valve only really wants to produce multiplayer games. They declared their intent to only produce multiplayer not long ago, whether this discluded Ep. 3 from production is something to wonder about.
Left 4 Dead and it's very quickly released sequel were produced so fluently because though it has singleplayer, the ultimate attraction was the multiplayer. And let's face it; had the effort that was put into Left 4 Dead 2 been put into Half Life 3 (and I mean without the episodes, the actual game as a whole) then the game would have been released LONG ago. And Left 4 Dead 2 was release ONE YEAR after it's prequel.
You could've said the same thing about Diablo 3 a couple years ago. You can't assume people's intentions, because you have no evidence other than that they don't talk about it.Episode 3 could have been released Long ago, but it hasn't. And there is a reason for said delay. Valve dragged their feet for too long and, just like that kid who doesn't wanna wash up, they're still sitting in the sink while he's off doing something else.
Valve doesn't feel obliged to complete their game series, they've moved on. And whenever they're pressed, the questions are dodged with little effort. Just move on, next topic please.
Um, fucking everyone? I don't know if you noticed, but Valve is sort of universally agreed to be one of the best developers that has ever existed and consistently puts out great games. The hype may be fading now, but once people see it exists, it'll explode.If the gaming community were to group together and SOMEHOW get Valve to promise to finish (by finish... I mean START) Episode 3, then who would buy it?
Why do think that? Could it be because every Valve game so far has been on consoles too?Episode 3 won't sell as well as it would have, especially when you consider that it'll probably NEVER be seen on XBOX or Playstation.
Yes, since you obviously know exactly what's happening at Valve this very moment with a game that's been said to be in some sort of production.Shall we forget about Episode 3? I think so. The sooner the better because, well... Ep. 3 just isn't coming. Though Valve won't admit it (because they like to keep you on the hook) Ep. 3's production hasn't even been started.
Here's the thing, everybody knows this, especially Valve. They know that, after all this time, if they don't do this, everybody would be more pissed and disappointed than if they didn't release anything at all. That's probably the biggest reason why this game has taken so long; they want to make sure that the wait will be worth it, and that means not just rehashing Half-Life 2 and the episodes.Falsename said:In fact if they didn't revamp the game but still sold it with the same elements as the previous episodes, it would be a disaster.
Let's not forget that there were another four companies in Duke Nukem Forever's production, on top of that!DoPo said:It was finished by them. Not made. They didn't do it from scratch, most of it was there already.TheScientificIssole said:Duke Nukem Forever took long, and was made by GearBox, they've made Half Life Games before. One of my favorites even. We're doomed.
Wait, what? I haven't actually heard about this one. What happened?Soviet Heavy said:Anyone remember how Episode 1 wasn't announced until maybe a month before it was released? And how during that short period of time, via osmosis alone, everyone went crazy with the hype machine? I have a feeling that Valve will do the same thing here.
Everyone will continue saying "half life is dead" and "it will never be released", and then Valve will announce the game is shipping in one month, and the entire internet will go ballistic once again. Valve pretty much learned not to do pre release footage ever since their 2003 leak incident, and it works well for them.
Jesus, I made you angry. I apologize. I'm not going to justify what I said though. Hopefully, I read your comment incorrectly.Matthew94 said:Your logic is so bad it isn't even funny.TheScientificIssole said:Duke Nukem Forever took long, and was made by GearBox, they've made Half Life Games before. One of my favorites even. We're doomed.
Precisely. That's why I don't like people saying "Gearbox ruined Duke Nukem" or anything to roughly that effect. It's like accusing somebody of ruining a frozen dinner because it's too salty or there isn't enough carrots in it or something.Lugbzurg said:Let's not forget that there were another four companies in Duke Nukem Forever's production, on top of that!DoPo said:It was finished by them. Not made. They didn't do it from scratch, most of it was there already.TheScientificIssole said:Duke Nukem Forever took long, and was made by GearBox, they've made Half Life Games before. One of my favorites even. We're doomed.
3-D Realms, Triptych Games, Piranha Games, and 2-K Games!
Why won't it sell well? You seriously underestimate Valve fans, and why won't it get a PS3 or Xbox360 release?Falsename said:Episode 3 won't sell as well as it would have, especially when you consider that it'll probably NEVER be seen on XBOX or Playstation.
People actually blame Gear Box for Duke Nukem Forever? That is insanely ignorant.DoPo said:Precisely. That's why I don't like people saying "Gearbox ruined Duke Nukem"
I do have to agree with this bit.Falsename said:Worth mentioning is that Episode 3's plot won't be resolved logically. Can you think of a logical way to explain the G-man's plot that wouldn't leave people disappointed or insulted. Telling the player that the g-man is apart of Gordon's subconscious and not actually real, would be like ME3's ending (and we all know how that went down).
There is a LARGE difference between Half-Life and Mass Effect 3, in that people EXPECT the G-Man, and EXPECT him to be mysterious.skywolfblue said:I do have to agree with this bit.
A) If they explain the g-man, then the "mystery" is lost. Fans whine.
B) If the g-man is left unexplained, then it's what a lot of people threw a fit over ME3's ending for. Fans whine.
There isn't really any way to resolve the g-man plot without pissing off half the fanbase.
Fair enough I suppose.SajuukKhar said:There is a LARGE difference between Half-Life and Mass Effect 3, in that people EXPECT the G-Man, and EXPECT him to be mysterious.skywolfblue said:I do have to agree with this bit.
A) If they explain the g-man, then the "mystery" is lost. Fans whine.
B) If the g-man is left unexplained, then it's what a lot of people threw a fit over ME3's ending for. Fans whine.
There isn't really any way to resolve the g-man plot without pissing off half the fanbase.
Mass Effect 3's ending sucked because it was pulled out of nowhere at the final minute. Half-Life has built up the G-Man as a mysterious unknowable god-like force.
It can get away with not explaining him because people EXPECT that.
If Valve had simply sat on their collective asses and did nothing ala 3D Realms (the creators of Duke Nukem) the sting would be worse for any fan, but they instead pulled out multiple launches stated by bahumat42. Yes they may have written themselves into a corner for the next episode, yes the episode model failed for them, but at least they admit it and are trying to move on and not blame the fans. I personally can't think of any game company that can pull off HL2 Episode 3 other than Valve and they do deserve some slack, they may need a prod but the results are often worth it.bahumat42 said:don't moan so much, considering they "wasted their time on"
Portal
portal 2
tf2
l4d and l4d 2
their some fantastic games, so frankly i say let them do what they do, its working.
I've thought about this quite a lot and while it would be difficult, I think it's possible to give him an explanation that's both appropriate and to which doesn't deflate his intrigue. The key is to make it something completely unexpected and original. Something that'll make gamers gasp. He can't just turn out to be an alien or time traveler or demigod or something.skywolfblue said:I do have to agree with this bit.
A) If they explain the g-man, then the "mystery" is lost. Fans whine.
B) If the g-man is left unexplained, then it's what a lot of people threw a fit over ME3's ending for. Fans whine.
There isn't really any way to resolve the g-man plot without pissing off half the fanbase.