Ah, here we have another progressive-minded, forward-thinking gamer who isn't afraid to regale us with their insights. Do you want a pat on the back? Yep, you taught us all a lesson about the importance of individuality and going against convention. I'm cleaning up the fragments of my monocle as we speak.
Really? My issue isn't so much that you say that don't like the game, but that you bothered to share this opinion with the rest of the world when the sum of your critical evaluation can be boiled down to, "Uh, it isn't good." How is that supposed to spark a discussion? You haven't bothered to actually analyze the game and your reaction to it and share those issues, be they technical, design-based, art-based, plot-based, etc. Because your opinion doesn't contain any analysis, the only counter-argument one could make is, "Nuh-uh!"
Yes, yes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and so-forth, but by the same token, no one needs to respect under-thought and/or poorly communicated opinions. If the OP had contained some measure of analysis that explained WHY they feel the game didn't work for them, then that would carry more weight. Without any additional information, it just feels like yet another person on the internet trying to prove their "edgy" bona fides.
Tl;dr: this is super dumb.
