I gotta admit.. that damn tiger thing looks so cute. I saw the demo for it and it just made me smile.
I'm a sucker for cute and cuddly.
I'm a sucker for cute and cuddly.
Thank you, Logan, I've long awaited to hear some good news about Natal (NOT KINECT, I WILL NOT CALL IT THAT! IT'S A STUPID NAME!), and hearing this makes me finally think people could be swayed by it's potential. I've wanted to get this for ages, looking forward to Natal's release greatly, and yet I've sadly seen so many people on this site denounce it purely because it didn't seem to be aimed at 'hardcore' gamers. That is, it wasn't aimed at those people, and they seemed to feel that Microsoft should only produce technology and products for them, and no-one else. Which is a shame.Logan Westbrook said:There's no reason why the next Call of Juarez couldn't have Kinect compatible quick-draw sections, and Kinect could make the alchemy in The Elder Scrolls V a lot more involved. Kinect has bags of potential, and personally I hope that the hardcore do buy it so that potential can be realized.
When did you exactly start gaming, 2-buttons and a d-pad declared you a gamer back then, now it's not so easy. The biggest console always has the most shitty games, look at the ps2 library. If anything, It's this kind of thinking that is holding gaming back. I would say maybe help the new players get into gaming but we don't need more people thinking like this.Ganthrinor said:Yes, the controller for the system that panders to the masses with terrible games.Baby Tea said:The Power Glove I can understand, but the Wiimote?Ganthrinor said:Also, controller Enhancment shit like this is always a bad idea. Didn't we learn anything from the Power Glove and the Wiimote?
The main controller for the console that outsold the crap out of the other two?
The main controller for the console that has Nintendo swimming in money filled pools, and then drying themselves off with more money?
The main controller for the console that introduced gaming to a who massive group of people who otherwise would have never bothered?
That Wiimote?
Just checking.
Yes, the controller for the system that turned Nintendo into whores.
Yes, the controller for the system that lets mouthbreathing fuckwits claim to be gamers.
The Wiimote. Vibrating Motion-Dildo of "Hey This Game Controls Like Shit".
I guess not! Sheesh!NickCaligo42 said:EDIT: .... Oh, huh. It's you again. XD We're NEVER gonna agree on this, huh?Baby Tea said:You have to remember that some games will be using both Kinect, and the tradition controller. Fable 3, for example, is slated to use Kinect for townsfolk interactions and such, but still use the controller for regular gameplay.
It doesn't have to be a controller replacement, so much as a controller enhancement
Or it's not ready to show.1 - They don't state what they're going to use it for. This goes straight into the "probably gonna suck" bin along with all the trailers Square-Enix shows that don't have any gameplay footage in them. If they aren't telling you what they're doing with it, they probably don't know themselves or aren't that proud of it.
What I like about the possibilities of Kinect is things like leaning, puzzle solving in adventure games, and other superflous additions that make the game more immersive. I will say that I think leaning with Kinect is fast and more intuitive then binding it to a button+analog stick combo, but the rest isn't just about streamlining controls, it's about immersion as well. Solving a sliding puzzle in an adventure game, or panning a world map around sounds kind of cool when combined with Kinect. Obviously some people won't be huge into that, and that's fine, but that doesn't mean the whole thing is a write off. Some people hate RTS games, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't make anymore of them.2 - What could they honestly do with the Kinect and a controller that they couldn't already do with just the controller? Is that sort of functionality really worth the time and effort it takes the program it? Is that the kind of thing we want to encourage developers to do?...I don't know, I just don't see why this is a better alternative than putting the motion control and the controller in the same device so that you're not taking your hand off one thing to put it on another.
Like Mario Galaxy 1 and 2, the new Zelda games, Red Steel 2, and Mario Kart?Ganthrinor said:Yes, the controller for the system that panders to the masses with terrible games.
I don't get this...they are whores because they made tons of money by making a product loved by millions?Yes, the controller for the system that turned Nintendo into whores.
Oh! I had no idea that there was a line in the sand for what makes someone a gamer.Yes, the controller for the system that lets mouthbreathing fuckwits claim to be gamers.
I didn't think the Wiimote vibrated. Is that an add-on?The Wiimote. Vibrating Motion-Dildo of "Hey This Game Controls Like Shit".
Right, I forgot how poor Dance Dance Revolution sold.(Just saying there is a market for it but not everyone will be into it.)bigsby said:Yes but, the Wii is not very popular with the hardcore folks, since most of us are perfectly fine with a controller with buttons and not really into jumping and waving in front of our TV. If Microsoft tries to force-feed the Kinect to the hardcore folks, like, make it mandatory for games like Fable 3 or *the horror* Mass Effect 3, that will make alot of people VERY angry.Baby Tea said:The Power Glove I can understand, but the Wiimote?Ganthrinor said:Also, controller Enhancment shit like this is always a bad idea. Didn't we learn anything from the Power Glove and the Wiimote?
The main controller for the console that outsold the crap out of the other two?
The main controller for the console that has Nintendo swimming in money filled pools, and then drying themselves off with more money?
The main controller for the console that introduced gaming to a who massive group of people who otherwise would have never bothered?
That Wiimote?
Just checking.
First of all, a DS is very very different form Kinect The two aren't even remotely the same. I don't like hand-helds, and I don't want one. I used to own a DS, never played it, got rid of it. IT's a fine system for those who like that sort of thing, but you can't say' WHy not buy a DS?' when they are incredibly different.Gamegodtre said:Did you wacth the press Conference for Microsoft the impression it gave said that Kinect wouldn't be used as a "enhancement" but more like a gimmick to get kids and parents to buy it.
granted i didn't hear Peters Press Conference (nor do i know if he had one). Also the Ludicrous price point of 149.99 is insane it would have to be 49.99 for it to market well since who would buy a Kinect when you can get a DS for a little bit more?
So?Baby Tea said:also the controller which dumbed down most of Nintendos games to a whole new level of kiddy games and sports games that just use the Wii because people see movement based controls and think it can be a replacement for exercise or the other people who flock to it because they could not handle button controls and thought the motion contol would be easier.
So what?As a gamer who has more then undoubtedly played more games then most i only own i'd say 20 Wii games maybe up to 25 now in comparison to the amount i own for the PS3, around 50, for the 360 around 150, and DS over 100(can't even ballpark it). The Wii has Isolated a large amount of people do to its excessive marketing to the old and the young. me being neither find it hard to purchase the games for the system.
For every kinect feature they put into TES V an infant will die.Deofuta said:Hell yeah, think about all the Hardcore gamers with Beiber Fever!
Also,
Don't even JOKE about such matters! Think about all the jumping I'd have to do to level up? Id' be tired out in 10 minutes!Kinect could make the alchemy in The Elder Scrolls V a lot more involved.
But look at that small baby tiger, how is that NOT hardcore?Jezzascmezza said:Sorry Microsoft-
Kinect is NOT hardcore
"Bad control experiences with games using a traditional controller". That sounds more like the game iteslf had poor controls. I'm opposed to the idea of flinging around a plastic wand or gesticulating wildly at your television as a method of command input. The oncoming invasion of 3D goggles and motion tracking just strikes me as a needless avalanche of garbage. The Controller has served us faithfully for a long time, and hopefully, will continue to do so. Now, when they start putting out Neural Interaction Units... THEN I'll get excited.Baby Tea said:Like Mario Galaxy 1 and 2, the new Zelda games, Red Steel 2, and Mario Kart?Ganthrinor said:Yes, the controller for the system that panders to the masses with terrible games.
I don't get this...they are whores because they made tons of money by making a product loved by millions?Yes, the controller for the system that turned Nintendo into whores.
70 million Wiis sold. That's not 'whore', that's 'good business'.
Oh! I had no idea that there was a line in the sand for what makes someone a gamer.Yes, the controller for the system that lets mouthbreathing fuckwits claim to be gamers.
Here I just thought: If you play games, you're a gamer.
Oh my mistake. I didn't know.
And, as someone who frequently plays on Xbox Live, I would say there are more 'mouth-breathers' on the 'hardcore' side.
I didn't think the Wiimote vibrated. Is that an add-on?The Wiimote. Vibrating Motion-Dildo of "Hey This Game Controls Like Shit".
And I've had some really bad control experiences with games using traditional controllers.
Does that mean controllers suck?