Daystar Clarion said:
So, it has come to my attention that many American TV shows are run into the ground. Series such as Scrubs, Two and a Half Men, the Simpsons and CSI(just to name a few) were great shows, but after several series they've all gone down hill, and by down hill I mean fell off a cliff.
This isn't to say America is the only offender, but it's certainly the worst by far. So while truly great and original shows like Futurama and Firefly get cancelled (although I hear Futurama is coming back), Two and a Half men, which was great to begin with, has long stopped being funny, yet it continues to run, and the less said about Scrubs, the better.
Now I understand that popular shows make a lot of money and it's for that reason that they keep going for as long as they do, but don't the writers want their shows to be remembered for being great? Not 'that one show that started great and then was pretty shit for several years'.
Here in Britian, shows like Fawlty Towers and Blackadder, while very popular, only ran for 2 and 4 series respectively. You can gurantee that if any of those two shows were to suddenly return with a new season, their ratings would soar. But they won't return any time soon, for one reason. The writers don't want to write a new series for the sake of writing a new series, they want their work to be just as funny as it's always been, not churning out some forced plot just for the sake of it.
It's certainly the safe option, milking a series for all it's worth (let's not forget how guilty the video game industry is that), but it saddens me to see so many good shows(say what you want about America, but they have some damn good TV shows) die, when they could have finished with a bang and always be remembered as a great series.
So, fellow escapist, what are your thoughts on the matter?
The problem is that here in America we're
retarded unaware that too much of a good thing is a bad thing.
American TV shows are designed to be never-ending, and the way they do that is by never setting a plot
[sub]If the above picture doesn't make any sense to you, you'd make a great American TV writer.[/sub]
Plot's are standard in books and movies because books and movies are finite entities. having the END of a story looming helps give the action purpose. That's what makes certain shows awesome (Firefly, Buffy, a metric fuck-ton of animes I could mention, Twin Peaks, hopefully The United States of Terra, probably some foreign shows I haven't seen, and Miniseries's like The Room[sub]If you haven't seen The Room, you should get on that[/sub])
They all conform to the story arc and they all have endings.
More general American TV shows tend to go for the infinite story approach where they have a bunch of one or two season story arcs where all status quo is restored at the end but then they're on to something
bigger and
better and
more intense. (see Burn Notice or Dexter or 24 or any show really they all get interchangeable after about 3 seasons. Dragon Ball Z is the worst offender)
Then there are comedies (2.5 men, Simpsons etc.) sit-coms, Situational Comedies, they have characters and they have situations. and that's the full extent of the plot
(Charlie is an alcoholic womanizing jingle writer, Alan is a broke divorced father, what mischief can they get up to this episode.) the good ones start out funny as all hell but then the running gags get played out and the stereotypes get tired. (South Park and The Simpsons are the only two that are consistently funny)
This got long-winded didn't it?
how's about a
TL: DR
American TV shows don't follow a traditional plot line (intro, rising action, climax, falling action)
they tend to go for a more milk-able story structure (intense thing happens, status quo restored, intestine thing happens, status quo restored, repeat ad nauseum) and that gets boring fast.
the reason comedies all eventually suck is that the jokes get played out.