Here's a thing to talk about...

Recommended Videos

Fniff

New member
Apr 15, 2009
9,333
0
0
You know how the usual post apocalyptic(I just love saying that word!) scenario is "THE COLD WAR GOT HOT!"

Well,you know Hitler actually was in the first few stages of making a nuclear bomb in the Second World War? Well,he was. And that's scary.

Now,we ask questions. What if he had made the bomb already? Who would he attack first? Would he save it or use it immediately? Which cites would be hit hardest?
 

Pingieking

New member
Sep 19, 2009
1,362
0
0
London or Moscow. More likely London because it was within range of V2 rockets and Moscow wasn't. At least late in the war it wasn't.
 

Fniff

New member
Apr 15, 2009
9,333
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
He would have used it on Russia, America and England because they were at war with him.
Just like America used it on Japan.

Out of curiosity, how is Hitler making the bomb first any scarier then the U.S.A. making it first?
Well,the USA just used that on Japan,and that was horrible. Imagine that,20 times worse. Because,Hitler was at war with the allies,and they had more nations behind them,so more people would have lost.
 

madcap2112

New member
Jun 4, 2009
973
0
0
London would be first. Britain had been the thorn in his side the whole war and they hadn't surrendered even after the Blitzkrieg bombings. Moscow would probably be next just because they were closer. America would be the toughest to hit because of it's geography, but it could be done.
 

WrongSprite

Resident Morrowind Fanboy
Aug 10, 2008
4,503
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
Out of curiosity, how is Hitler making the bomb first any scarier then the U.S.A. making it first?
The U.S.A weren't into mass murdering Jews?
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,425
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
He would have used it on Russia, America and England because they were at war with him.
Just like America used it on Japan.

Out of curiosity, how is Hitler making the bomb first any scarier then the U.S.A. making it first?
Because his mustache makes everything he does that much scarier.
Honestly though had hitler made an atomic bomb first and used it, I'm pretty sure Germany would no longer exist as America had demonstrated its inability to give a shit about foreign countries peoples during the war.
 

Fniff

New member
Apr 15, 2009
9,333
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
Fniff said:
Demented Teddy said:
He would have used it on Russia, America and England because they were at war with him.
Just like America used it on Japan.

Out of curiosity, how is Hitler making the bomb first any scarier then the U.S.A. making it first?
Well,the USA just used that on Japan,and that was horrible. Imagine that,20 times worse. Because,Hitler was at war with the allies,and they had more nations behind them,so more people would have lost.
I guess but they would have still been used for the same reasons.
Umm....Yeaah... But the reason was "We hate them." and that's the reason for all malevolent actions.
 

MBergman

New member
Oct 21, 2009
340
0
0
As far as I've read. (In magazines so I can't link, sorry)
Nazi-Germany wouldn't have been able to make one because it lacked som vital resources, I'll see if I can find the article..
 

rokkolpo

New member
Aug 29, 2009
5,375
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
rokkolpo said:
he wouldn't dared.

he even killed himself.
the pussy
Ok, millions of people pissed at you are after invading your country and are planning to the most horrible things in the world to you. I guess you're still a pussy for killing yourself even if that's the case.
you know the saying. when you commit genocide,you gotta sit on the blisters.

not chicken out.