Mr Wednesday said:
faceless chick said:
I'd saaaay..Vlad the Impaler aka Dracula. Not because of the vampire myths (yuck), but he kicked ass!He was a real vigilante hero in the true sense of the word, cleaning up the streets from crime and helping the citizens rest at ease in a more moral society.
That is the most nuts thing I've seen on the internet in years.
Vlad Tepes? Vlad Fraking Tepes, the man who'd stick a pike up folks arses just because they pissed him off, the man who terrorized his population so much that he would become invovled in sodding vampire myth? That man was a murderous tyrant! Like virtually every leader at the time, I'll grant you, but he seemed to have a sadism all of his own.
You sound like the kind of person who thinks Rorschach is a great role model.
I guess I have to explain a little more.
It wasn't THE PEOPLE who considered him a menace. The people LOVED him,and they love him even more now.
The context: the country was a poor, oft-invaded piece of land, by either Turks,tartars,Huns or other migratory or savage race.
The airs to the thrones spent their lives hunting and killing each other, for power or fear of them themselves getting killed.
This wasn't a social hierarchy like western Europe was, this was a "every man for himself" country (still is)
Corruption is the main word here- the heirs paid the sultan for their thrones, paid tribute to be left alone(even though they STILL invaded every other year, it wasn't a conquering invasion, it was just a standard burn-and-pillage invasion), they reigned barely more then 1 year before a relative took the throne and killed him, or the aristocrats who really ran the country would kill him.
As such, crime was at sky-high and people couldn't go out in the streets for fear of being robbed, killed or raped.
When Vlad came to the throne, he saw the country was a piss-stain on the map and wanted to do something about it.
1st off, he denied privileges to Brasov (city in Transylvania) merchants when coming to Wallachia because the trades were unfair and his people ended up in the loss.
As a revenge, the Brasov hungarian merchants wanted to ruin his reputation,and seeing as how Western Europe knew nothing of the black hole known as Eastern Europe, they began spreading lies about how he was a vampire or ate in forests of steaks, knowing no one knew or cared about the truth.
And since Europe loved scandals (as much as they do now) they picked up the story, blew it to ungodly proportions and started to spread it around, having a good laugh in the process.
Proof is in the pamphlets, seeing as how they depict the act of impalement completely wrong-since they knew nothing about it- make unreal descriptions of diseases he didn't have or make drawings of him that looked NOTHING like the real person.
Anyway, he did indeed kill by impalement, but that was because it was one of the cruelest methods possible, and it made criminals afraid of committing crimes anymore.
In the end he killed less people because of this than he would have otherwise.
Sadism wasn't a deciding factor here, it is that he DID WHAT HE PROMISED AND WHAT HE SHOULD HAVE DONE.
He killed ONLY criminals(within his own country),and for the 1st and only time, there was no more corruption in the country.The people were safe to live normal lives and very grateful for it.
When he died, the country went to hell again and everyone regretted it.
He is held as a ROLE MODEL for every politician in the country.
Every president so far tried to live up to his image, and tried to clean up crime in the country to become a legend, just like him.
------------
So TL;DR, the stories weren't made by the PEOPLE, they were made by butthurt merchants who wanted to rain on his parade.
Sorry to burst your bubble, this is the truth.
It's the 15th century version of an internet rumor, basically.