I disagree. Fear and violence may have been a tactics used by Hitler and the Nazi Party, but it was not the primary strategy they used to gain, or ultimately maintain, power. Charisma, organization and propaganda were the prime movers behind Hitler's dramatic rise to power. Look at the Reichstag electoral results from the 1920s to 1932. In 1928, the Nazis only had 2% of the vote. In 1930, the Nazi party was the second largest party. By 1932, the Nazi party was the largest political party in Germany.Woem said:Hitler didn't become Chancellor in 1933 because he was charismatic but because people feared him. The conservative Franz von Papen assured that the aggressive Hitler could better be controlled within the legal boundaries of Chancellor but even weeks after his assignment he changed the law to put aside his political competitors. He needed to do this because even with all the propaganda and political plays his party (NSDAP) wasn't able to gain a majority of votes: they landed at 43%.
So Hitler or his party never gained political power by the vote of the people, and definitely not because he was charismatic, but by political corruption and backstabbing. Much unlike Obama.
The perfect example of how Hitler was able to use his charisma and propaganda machine was how he was able to exploit the Reichstag Fire. He appealed to a latent distrust of Communists within the nation, and used it to eliminate his opponents and consolidate power. You could cite this as an example of "fear" politics, but the fact is that he was able to sell this to the people so easily. He was able to persuade the people that he was truly doing what was best for Germany.
In essence, "fear" - fear of Jews, fear of Communists, etc. - played a large role in the Nazi rhetoric. The trick isn't in the fear, it's in how the Nazis were able to propagandize and sell that fear through Hitler and using a massive personality cult.
Now, I'm not comparing Obama and Hitler based on this. They used different approaches toward winning over the populace. However, they both successfully used their rhetoric to sway the people. Obama, instead of tapping into latent hatreds, tapped into the national desire for "Change", for "Hope", for something different.