Xojins said:
There is no perfect game, and I sure hope there won't ever be, because every game made afterwards would just be "meh."
But one does have to wonder, wouldn't a game being "perfect" essentially eliminate any need for another game from then on? Because think about it; a perfect game would have the best graphics that the largest concentration of gamers would like, have (most likely) an unlimited, open world with dynamic characters and situations that would genuinely make them more lifelike than real people. And probably explosions and boobies (for the straight guys). A perfect game would assumedly cover all of its bases flawlessly and wonderfully, so games after that being "meh" doesn't seem likely because you already have everything you could possibly get of a video game from the perfect one.
However:
Such a thing is nigh impossible, because of technical, financial and creative shortcomings. We will never know what will satisfy ALL Gamers. This is due to the very simple fact that, while "perfect" in even the most professional viewpoint, there will always be someone who is very much not privy to the game for whatever reason, even though there is absolutely nothing wrong with the "perfect" game, and everything in it appeals greatly to gamers. It's a paradox, like the perfect politician.