Well, perhaps next time you won't be so lax, man. (ba dum tish)Laxman9292 said:Thanks for that. Well anyways I guess maybe he cooperated and helped out the prosecutors or something. Cause no way would they settle for 6 years unless he was cooperative or there's a maximum sentence. I just don't know enough about itPhiMed said:He wasn't convicted of tax evasion. He was convicted of fraud. A similar case is being prosecuted in the same state, and the prosecutor is seeking a 385-year sentence. You can read about it <link=http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/virginia/Farkas-may-face-life-sentence-for-fraud>hereLaxman9292 said:Because, under the law, robbing a bank period probably has a minimum of 15 yearsJabberwock xeno said:![]()
This disgusts me.
How do you guys feel about this? Any idea of what we can do to make this shit better?
On the other hand, tax evasion has a fine OR a maximum 5 year incarceration or a combination of both. I'm not sure what type of fraud he committed but i would think it would have similar punishments.
You see, the law is the law and applies to everyone. Just because a person is poor or had good reasons to break the law doesn't mean he is not punished as harshly by it. The law applies the same to everyone, not just people who can afford it.