That boat sequence in the original 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' is like a horror film within a kids film.
Serious answer: The Shining.
Serious answer: The Shining.
Ah, ok, I take your point.DoPo said:The story is about Harry and co doing stuff. They aren't actively gravitating around them, the way a title of "Harry Potter and the Serial Killer Maniac" would suggest things would go.thaluikhain said:What about the werewolf that liked mauling kids? Or the snatchers?DoPo said:They never focus on themenough, though. And I'd like to see an actual serial killer, not the shadow of Voldy just looming over there when everybody denies it (although, that does sound remarkably like a horror movie).
Precisely, imagine what the serial killer would need to do, to have a whole story focused on him (or her). The title speaks volumes you somehow ignored.thaluikhain said:Not mentioned that much, though, and not really that scary when eveyrone else is anyway.
I see those films as more of a suspense/comedy than anything else. I mean it's suspenseful to see how and who the next one to die is, but the things that happen (love the Rube Goldberg explanation) are just so insanely impossible that it really just becomes funny, kind of like the Saw movies.Relish in Chaos said:Could the Final Destination films count? I mean, they?re not actually scary and you could make a case that there is a monster in "Death", but there?s no deathly figure ever seen in its physical form, and it?s mostly about fate and the characters dying from Rude Goldberg-esque events.
The Shining was 1980, but it was definitely ahead of its time cinematography wise!nexus said:The Shining (1998)
Yea, I don't know what was in my head.. maybe thinking of the made-for-TV version that had Stephen King's guiding hand. Which is also good, but you can't beat Kubrick.Rawberry101 said:The Shining was 1980, but it was definitely ahead of its time cinematography wise!nexus said:The Shining (1998)