How Assassin's Creed IV Is Being Created by Seven Different Studios

Recommended Videos

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
Fanstastic. After Aliens:CM "collaboration" and how that game turned out, i will not pre-order this game.
 

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,265
0
0
Well aren't you all barrels of rainbows and sunshine today? -.-

Yes it's 7 Studio's, but they aren't separate company's that don't talk to each other, it's not Like EA Started it, then it went over to Gearbox, and then Epic Games...This is all Ubisoft, 1 company, with 7 studio's, all talking to each other on what should go here, and what this should look like. Sure it sounds complicated, but if they have been doing this since the second game then i have no complaints, sure the 3rd game is definitely the weakest out of them all, but it's by no means a bad game...

Now for something a bit more positive, seen as though you are all clearly going on your periods. :p

I really do hope they pull this off, it's about time we got a decent pirate game.

The only thing i am worried about is Naval battles and the apparent 50 locations (i assume they will be islands) i hope they make each location feel different and not just copy and paste everything.

Also, hunting whales...HELL YEH
 

GAunderrated

New member
Jul 9, 2012
998
0
0
Well good thing to know, now I won't buy AC4 until I see how the final product turns out. Given the current trends of multiple studios making games very inconsistent and bland as balls, I have a feeling AC4 will be no different. It is probably 7 studios to avoid non-stop crunch time from the yearly releases.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
"How Assassin's Creed IV Is Being Created by Seven Different Studios."

Badly, one assumes. AssCreed 3 was what it says on the tin. Ass. I don't know why they keep thinking that announcing a stupid number of studios are working on it does it any favours.
 

axlryder

victim of VR
Jul 29, 2011
1,862
0
0
Yes, fantastic. Because seven different artists painting a single picture is often the best way to achieve a cohesive, focused final product.

I'm sure that's oversimplifying things, but if AC3 was developed in a similar vein and is an indicator of things to come, then it doesn't seem unlikely this has something to do with it.
 

piinyouri

New member
Mar 18, 2012
2,708
0
0
Having recently started playing AC3, all I can say is I do not care.
While I don't think the naval battles in AC3 where the only good thing (I'm very much enjoying the whole thing) the naval battles are certainly their own special kind of fun. I was afraid it would be a nightmare to control and just not be very fun, but they nailed it.
Such a blast.

Building a whole game around that mechanic cannot disappoint me.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Yeah, with AC3 I'm officially done with the series. I loved the first game, the second game even more. Even Brotherhood was a game that I really enjoyed. But Revelations was crap and AC3 was even worse. I don't care who the protagonist is (in the memories or in the "present"), truly this series is dead to me.

The only way to ressurect it is to simplify, get back to the basics that made the first two (well, the first three for me at least) games so much fun. I just can't imagine there being that many skyscrapers in the middle of the Carribean...

Way too many side/bullshit/fluff features in the last two games for them to be entertaining. I play to shank people with hidden blades, not lay the foundation for a frickin' township.
 

bug_of_war

New member
Nov 30, 2012
887
0
0
While I agree outsourcing can be dangerous to the game (look at the reaction to Deus Ex: Human Revolution boss fights) I feel as though most people are being a little too negative. Yes there were un-polished section in AC3, my game in particular has a HUGE bug which makes the playing as the eagle section IMPOSSIBLE to 100% sync complete as the screen goes bright white. However, I feel there is a very noticible split between the AC fans as it seems half of the people disliked AC3, and others (like myself) thought it was a great edition. The only thing I can ask for is that whoever is designing the big assassination missions makes is so we can plan it ourselves and kill them stealthily like in AC1. Lets hope that 1 to 2 devs working on the single player heed the message coming from literally EVERY AC fan and take that advice (I'll probably still love the game, but freedom to kill how I want will always add bonus points and longevity).
 

Mad Sun

New member
Jul 15, 2011
53
0
0
Zombie_Moogle said:
Cuz it worked so well for Aliens: Colonial Marines, right?
Of course, A:CM was developed by multiple separate studios with next to no real relation to each other. Meanwhile, all of the studios working on AC4 are owned, managed, and directed by the same parent company. Even if that parent company is Ubisoft, it's got to count for something, right?
 

Eveonline100

New member
Feb 20, 2011
178
0
0
RatherDull said:
Seven studios. I cannot even begin to describe how crazy that is.

It's like cell architecture all over again.
okay i can kinda of get your point what's cell architecture?
 

King Aragorn

New member
Mar 15, 2013
368
0
0
First of all, let me start by saying I LOVED AC3. It's my favorite of the series, near perfect.
But this game..does not ring well. Aside tons of other issues that I can list, this is not a good thing.
The lack of focus is not a good thing, but rather the opposite. There is not one directive vision for the game. Look at revelations, supposedly 5-6 studios were working on it. It turned out to be the worst of the series.
 

Jamous

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,941
0
0
Huh. That's pretty cool. Will definitely be interesting to see the final product with this in mind.
 

oldtaku

New member
Jan 7, 2011
639
0
0
Sorry, you guys did this on AC3 and totally blew it. It's a hot mess with some definite good bits, and some definite horrible bits, and a total lack of cohesion and awareness of what the hell our central mechanics are. It's got a good plot (heck, I even liked the prequel bit with dad), but it is a very bad _game_. The naval battles were great, though totally out of place, so I can see why you're emphasizing them. But what crap are your other six studios cramming in there? Oh right, WHALING.

What was the name of this series again? Whale Assassin 2013?
 

The_Merchant

New member
Nov 9, 2011
82
0
0
One studio for one horribly repetitive mini-game that does not include ASSASSINATING people.
I honestly wonder if we ever get to see ASSASSINS ASSASSINATING others.
I mean...the game is after all called ASSASSIN's creed. Big emphasis on ASSASSINs...which ASSASSINATE people.


Also, i strongly discourage putting the game through 7 different studios. It's a minature version of the dev hell.
 

Proverbial Jon

Not evil, just mildly malevolent
Nov 10, 2009
2,093
0
0
My interest in Assassin's Creed was killed when they released Revelations, the most cash-grabby, soulless and vacuous Creed game I had played. This news, and the fact that this is the second Creed game to be released within a year, only serves to confirm my decision.