Nmil-ek said:Im actually quite amazed at the number of atheist americans who would say jsut dont bring it up, seriously? In Scotland n one gives a shit, I live in a heavy catholic/Jahova area but if someone comes to my door asking if i want to be saved ill generaly reply with a no thank you im an atheist, fuck off behind their backs. Why hide it? Atheists get a bad rep since there are a few loud mouths like Dawkins, nice guy im sure but far too vocal I dont beleive in religion and think all of it is a massive crock myself but i keep that to myself. Then again there are alot of religious nutters too so christians/muslims etc have a bad rep, please dont generalise helps no one beleiver or non.
However if people harass me and wake me up morning after morning with pamphlets on how invisible sky man dosent like me id say im within my rights to be pissed off and tell them so.
That is not a valid argument "against" Atheism. Yes, Mao, Hitler and Stalin all abhorred religion, but this was because religion would have been a powerful challenger to their power, not because they did not believe in God, in contrast to most killings done by religious groups, which have been done in the name of their preferred God.cuddly_tomato said:[CITATION NEEDED]
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/atrox.htm
I see a distinct lack of religious conflict there. I do see that three notable atheists (Mao, Stalin, Hitler) occupy the number 1, 2 and 3 slots though. FYI - I don't believe in god.
1) Hitler wasn't an atheistcuddly_tomato said:[CITATION NEEDED]
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/atrox.htm
I see a distinct lack of religious conflict there. I do see that three notable atheists (Mao, Stalin, Hitler) occupy the number 1, 2 and 3 slots though. FYI - I don't believe in god.
Arachon said:That is not a valid argument "against" Atheism. Yes, Mao, Hitler and Stalin all abhorred religion, but this was because religion would have been a powerful challenger to their power, not because they did not believe in God, in contrast to most killings done by religious groups, which have been done in the name of their preferred God.cuddly_tomato said:[CITATION NEEDED]
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/atrox.htm
I see a distinct lack of religious conflict there. I do see that three notable atheists (Mao, Stalin, Hitler) occupy the number 1, 2 and 3 slots though. FYI - I don't believe in god.
Ahhh... History revisionists. Hitler was an atheist, don't look at Mein Kampf for evidence of his religious views though, nothing in there is actually true (unless you believe he was a nice and reasonable person). Read some of what was written in the years following his death. Alan Bullocks Hitler: A study in Tyrany....cordeos said:1) Hitler wasn't an atheistcuddly_tomato said:[CITATION NEEDED]
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/atrox.htm
I see a distinct lack of religious conflict there. I do see that three notable atheists (Mao, Stalin, Hitler) occupy the number 1, 2 and 3 slots though. FYI - I don't believe in god.
2) Neither Stalin or Mao killed people in the name of Atheism, unlike the crusades which was done for overtly religious reasons.
I never said Stalin and Mao didn't kill people, but they never did it in the name of Atheism, not every murder committed by a christian is done in the name of Christianity. I can't remember a single time in history where people were killed in the name of Atheism, but things like the Crusades, the Inquisition, Violence between Sunni and Shia even the zionist campaigns in Palestine before the formation of Israel were done in part if not in whole in the name of a Religion.cuddly_tomato said:Ahhh... History revisionists. Hitler was an atheist, don't look at Mein Kampf for evidence of his religious views though, nothing in there is actually true (unless you believe he was a nice and reasonable person). Read some of what was written in the years following his death. Alan Bullocks Hitler: A study in Tyrany....
?the dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science. Religion will have to make more and more concessions. Gradually the myths crumble. When understanding of the universe has become widespread . . . then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity?.
And if you know nothing of the religious purges committed by Stalin and Mao during their tenures then I suggest you go back to history class.
Atheist fundamentalism is as ignorant and dangerous as religious fundamentalism. Worse right now, as there are so many about.
Never killed in the name of atheism?cordeos said:I never said Stalin and Mao didn't kill people, but they never did it in the name of Atheism, not every murder committed by a christian is done in the name of Christianity. I can't remember a single time in history where people were killed in the name of Atheism, but things like the Crusades, the Inquisition, Violence between Sunni and Shia even the zionist campaigns in Palestine before the formation of Israel were done in part if not in whole in the name of a Religion.cuddly_tomato said:Ahhh... History revisionists. Hitler was an atheist, don't look at Mein Kampf for evidence of his religious views though, nothing in there is actually true (unless you believe he was a nice and reasonable person). Read some of what was written in the years following his death. Alan Bullocks Hitler: A study in Tyrany....
?the dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science. Religion will have to make more and more concessions. Gradually the myths crumble. When understanding of the universe has become widespread . . . then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity?.
And if you know nothing of the religious purges committed by Stalin and Mao during their tenures then I suggest you go back to history class.
Atheist fundamentalism is as ignorant and dangerous as religious fundamentalism. Worse right now, as there are so many about.
Also on the Hitler point, he was a lapsed catholic, he never declared any non-belief in god and often used christian imagery in his speeches. I remember reading somewhere that he believed in an Aryan Jesus.
The Israelis only claim to that land is because god told them they could have it, so yes at its base it is a religious conflict. also the suicides are part of a warped version of Islam where killing yourself and innocent civilians isn't a sin.cuddly_tomato said:Never killed in the name of atheism?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism#Cambodia_under_the_Khmer_Rouge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_Soviet_Union
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China#Modern_history
And Israel is a religious conflict? Nothing to do with resources, ownership of land, invading of territory that has historically been Palestine for thousands of years, pumping ground water out of the West Bank, wars about damns, political leaders on both sides continuing the conflict for political reasons, or anything else?
The mindset of the fundamentalist atheist is astonishing. When a religious person does something bad, they accuse the religion. When an atheist does something bad, it can't have anything to do with their atheism. It is clear denial.
Let me make this simple - bad people do bad things. Good people do good things. Religion, or atheism, is neutral. Blame people for the shit they do.
I am interested though, which one of these states do you think is closest to a utopia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism