well besides Fable there are others. like that gay guy from GTA 4 he was positive. but that is all that comes to mind.Gaskell said:It just occurred to me that very few games have gay or lesbian characters.
There are one or two exceptions to this, Fable 2 being the only one I can think of off hand, though I don't think this should count, as your character's choices are controlled by the player.
How members of the gay and lesbian community here feel about this?
Do you care?
I have to agree with this. I mean when a character's sexuality is alluded to in a game subtly and it's not really important I don't care. But making sure everyone knows exactly how gay or straight the characters is is pointless and would only serve to complicate.Lios said:Let me give you the one true and simple answer: Because it is unnecessary. Not just unnecessary to have homosexuals, but it's unnecessary to even announce characters sexualities. It serves no real purpose but to add complications, and moreover, it doesn't even matter.
No one really cares whether or not a character in a game is gay or straight. Announcing it will just create controversy.
Good point. I liked the fact that guy gave me a freaking Lamborghini.hippykiller said:well besides Fable there are others. like that gay guy from GTA 4 he was positive. but that is all that comes to mind.Gaskell said:It just occurred to me that very few games have gay or lesbian characters.
There are one or two exceptions to this, Fable 2 being the only one I can think of off hand, though I don't think this should count, as your character's choices are controlled by the player.
How members of the gay and lesbian community here feel about this?
Do you care?
GTA San Andreas, Faith from Mirrors EdgeThe infamous SCAMola said:I wouldn't say it's that much of a "No gays in videogames" thing as much as it is a "No minorities in games".
When's the last time you saw a Black or Asian protagonist in a game?
How's this for "identified by their sexuality": the vast majority of video game characters never give the slightest indication of their sexual orientation, and yet you assume none of them are gay.Gaskell said:I just wondered because I'm a Literary studies student at Uni, just compiling my dissertation on approaching to literary theory, and the sexual orientation theory was quite interesting.
With the gay/lesbian story, it opens up for deeper characterizations and stories, perhaps looking at the persecution faced by them, or how characters feel they have to excel so they aren't identified by their sexuality
Dodgy metaphors aside, when was the last time you told someone your sexuality, or had it stated?Gaskell said:I was referring to not making a big deal of their sexuality, but it being stated, and then the game carries on, it just being another level of the characterisation cake
If they're gay or lesbian, it's just delicious creamy fillin
Because it's unnecessary and promotes negativity. Heroes are defined as Everyman (or woman) for a reason. They're everything to everyone.KeiraZodiac said:Many people on here seem to argue that "It's not a big deal so why include it?"
to that I ask "It's not a big deal so why NOT include it?"
Gordon is whatever and whoever the player decides he is. That's the beauty of having a silent protagonist.Digital Baklava said:isn't gordan freeman gay?
I tell people what my sexuality is all the time. That way, I weed out the homophobes in the room trying to talk to me.The_root_of_all_evil said:Dodgy metaphors aside, when was the last time you told someone your sexuality, or had it stated?Gaskell said:I was referring to not making a big deal of their sexuality, but it being stated, and then the game carries on, it just being another level of the characterisation cake
If they're gay or lesbian, it's just delicious creamy fillin
People defined as "Gay" tend to be the worst excesses of a stereotype. If they just happen to enjoy sleeping with the same sex, where's the need in stating it? It doesn't define you who you are.