Axolotl said:
I hate Piracy and anybody who illegally downloads a game. I won't argue it's morality because people will justify anything.
However 3 little facts. Epic left the PC market because of Piracy. ID are leaving the PC market because of Piracy. Crytek will soon leave the market because of piracy.
UT 3 just came out. Epic didn't leave, they just see that consoles are a profitable locale.
Idtech5 and thus Rage are coming out on the PC. Hell, it might even come out on Linux. Id has not shown intentions of leaving PCs.
I'm sure you believe that Crytek statement, since you ostensibly believe everything you write, but given their lack of a plan to port Crysis and the fact that FarCry 2 came out on PCs, your statement seems... outrageously flawed.
As for the debate on piracy as theft, piracy and theft are not inherently the same. It's damaging to the industry all the same, but consider things this way: would you steal a car? No? Well, if someone duplicated a car and offered it to you for free, would you take it? Maybe? If the once you purchased the original car you had to sign a contract before you could turn the key in the ignition(bear in mind you don't see this contract until after you have bought it and somehow brought it home without driving), would you still refuse the free version of this car? If you decided you didn't like the contract they asked you to sign, brought back the car, and the dealer said you can't sell it back because you opened the door, would you be more inclined to take the free car next time? And if you accepted the car and the contract, started driving and find that you were moving slower that you were supposed to and there was an obtrusive tracking monitor on the windshield that told the car makers your location at all times, would you perhaps find the free alternative a bit more interesting? If, after all this, you decide to keep the car, but have it dictated to you after the fact that you cannot sell your car to anyone else because it simply won't work for them, and you cannot modify it to run on a different fuel or drive off-road, would you maybe feel that these problems might've all been circumvented if you'd simply taken the damn free car?
These are fairly represenetative of what some companies(*cough*EA) are doing, and what's more, not all of them seem to feel the need to do it. Stardock and Blizzard are both competitive companies that have good IPs and somehow manage to make do without DRM(Stardock has that WildTangent thing, but it doesn't really seem to do anything). Now, that might poke a hole in my little analogy: if it sucks to buy the one car, why don't you simply buy a car from a different company that doesn't do that? Well, I actually do that, but at this point as I previously stated I feel it would make more of an impression if people just pirated the game, sent a portion of the cost, and promise the rest of the money when the company allowed non-crippled version of their software. It makes the statement clear, and puts them in much less of a position to continually hide behind piracy as the reason they constantly screw their customers.