That sums it up quite nicely, i am a little bummed out for the same price at release either you have a digital copy or a shelf copy, but we all knew that the price didnt have anything to do with actual costs ,right ?erbkaiser said:I have no problem with that at all, since Steam is awesome. Yes, it does stop reselling, but in return you get a disc free launcher without the need for an active internet connection (only once needed per PC to download and authenticate), you can install it on multiple PCs at once, and it is auto-updated.
Many DRM schemes suck, but Steam actually adds value and does not punish the customer.
Furburt said:I really like Steam, except for one thing, is that when you have the disk in front of you, with all the data on it, it still downloads it off the internet. That's my only problem.
However, everything else about it is great, the digital distribution, the community, the game management, the deals, all very good. So I don't mind hearing it's on a game at all.
DRM done well, as I see it.
It generally says it does, they have every right to decide how to make their game and what tools to use. If you don't liek those choices then don't buy it.-Samurai- said:I think having Steam shouldn't be required. Who are they to tell me what I have to have on my computer? If I buy a game in store, I expect it to work without being forced to get something I don't want.
Kaymish said:and there are loads of pirates out there that will probably crack the DRM not long after valve cuts support