Dags90 said:
StBishop said:
It's actually really not a very effective way to lose weight. The amount of exercise required to burn off a single snack (whether a large apple, or a mars bar) is ridiculous when you could simply just eat less.
A large apple usually has a lot less calories though.
Drinks are also problematic. It's very easy to drink over 500 calories a day. Throw in some alcohol and it can get even worse.
One trick I've heard of is to get smaller plates/cups. The added inconvenience of having to get more food/drink does wonders. I could definitely see it working, I drink a lot more soda when my minifridge is well stocked.
Indeed. The mars bar was a bad pick.
But a can of coca cola in Australia has about 70Cal while an Apple has about 65. It's the comparison I usually use to illustrate the point you made about soft drinks. (Mars bars in Australia have about 250Cal for anyone keeping score at home)
One can of coke is like adding an apple (a relatively sugary and caloricly dense food) to your day, so people who cut out 2 or 3 cans are essentially cutting an entire meal's worth of food from their day.
On the plates thing, it does work (anecdotal evidence only). My mother found that it helped, whereas I will leave food on my plate, get seconds, or make more food depending on my hunger, I'm pretty good at gauging how much I've eaten. Some people do find though that a small, full plate feels more satisfying than a large, emptier plate with the same amount of food.
valleytree said:
Jarsh82 said:
Like a lot of people in their late twenties, I put on more than a little weight. Over the past year I lost fifty pounds by running and cross fit. What do you do to keep the pounds off?
If you have an hour to spare you should watch this BBC Horizon episode: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pfna7nV7WaM
It arrives at some pretty simple ways of staying healthy, loosing weight and prevent diabetes. It also goes into details with how exercise has absolutely no effect on some people. Worth a watch!
Inb4 intermittent fasting.
Jarsh82 said:
StBishop said:
taxidriver said:
Just exercise. Is not that hard to understand. It is hard to do.
It's actually really not a very effective way to lose weight. The amount of exercise required to burn off a single snack (whether a large apple, or a mars bar) is ridiculous when you could simply just eat less.
The effect exercise has on your metabolism is what contributes to weight loss not the actual amount of calories being burned during the exercise.
Sounds to me like you're talking more about body composition than pure weight loss.
Any chance of you elaborating what you mean?
EDIT: What exactly you mean by the effect had on metabolism, where you got the information, and why you think this.