How do you picture the world ending?

Recommended Videos

Zantos

New member
Jan 5, 2011
3,653
0
0
It will end in some 20 to 30 years. I will, shortly after I am awarded professorship and several nobel prizes and medals for my mad physix skillz, make such a monumental div(zero) error that it rips a hole in the fabric of the universe.
 

Marik2

Phone Poster
Nov 10, 2009
5,462
0
0
Levethian said:
Harold Camping [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Camping] might. Probably not though, not a reliable one anyway.
Ah another dumbass trying to use some mathmatical bullshit to predict when the world will end when it clearly tells you that only God knows... [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnJ8cmaT3Ek&feature=related]
 

lhin

New member
Nov 18, 2009
38
0
0
Realistically: with a war or something humans have no power over.

Theoretically: with tits and fire.
 

Vrex360

Badass Alien
Mar 2, 2009
8,379
0
0
Giant octopus monsters devouring absolutely everything!
From the depth of outer space come the great and mighty Monsterpus armada. They are devouring and tentacling and sliming up every surface in their endless destructive quest for food and the souls and screaming of the pathetic human race!!
They tower over rooftops:


They emerge from the sea!



They have such might that all of mankind's greatest buildings collapse before them!!



And they now hold the entire planet hostage in their fearsome tentacles!!!



No one shall be safe, no one shall be free.... when.... the OCTOCAPLYPSE HAPPENS!!


... Alternatively I'll just use the mighty Sangheili fleet again to exterminate you human filth but in the meantime enjoy the giant octopus.
 

joeman098

New member
Jun 18, 2007
179
0
0
DrNobody18 said:
Wierdguy said:
I imagine it will end in exactly 12 days from now.
I can see it now. I laugh at this statement now, but in 12 days the world really will end, and at that point my last thoughts will probably be giving you mad props for the epic win of that post.
would that really be an epic win =P
 

Tradjus

New member
Apr 25, 2011
273
0
0
Well that's a complicated question, really depends on what you consider an end to the world. For example, in about eight hundred million years or so, the Earth will be so close to the sun that it's atmosphere will blow off leaving it a cinder incapable of supporting any life.

But as for the end of human beings specifically, it'll probably be something really stupid and easily avoidable that we just ignored until it was too late.
 

Prof. Monkeypox

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,014
0
0
Corporate apocalypse.

After the world has been stripped of all it's resources, the poor kill themselves in the street for the amusement of those who stockpiled and grew fat in the intervening time.

Then, with no resources, and no more workers, the bourgeois quietly drink themselves to death.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Well I'm guessing the world will end when our sun dies. If you mean our current civilistaion we are either going to turn the planet into a glass parking lot with nukes or bring on another ice age by global warming.
 

Saerain

New member
Mar 24, 2009
78
0
0
TestECull said:
I admire your faith in the rationality of politicians
Beyond rationality: no sane person is going to initiate a first nuclear strike. There's no benefit for them. However greedy or irrational you might think politicians are, what you're implying requires someone not just stupid or drunk on power, but literally insane (and bereft of checks and balances). You're saying they'd do it for oil, but who is going to think that initiating a nuclear conflict is going to win them oil? Unless they are to receive it in an afterlife.

The practically guaranteed risk of initiating a first nuclear strike in a nuclear-armed world is mutually assured destruction, and the threat of that is the point of having these weapons.

If you want to say that a person might take power in a nuclear-armed country who might want to usher in a nuclear apocalypse--be it to hasten Judgment Day, acquire virgins, or reincarnate as a superintelligent space crystal--fine. It's possible, even if there are many factors making it unlikely. What I take issue with is the idea that an administration would decide that an apocalypse is to their material benefit.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
Saerain said:
TestECull said:
I admire your faith in the rationality of politicians
Beyond rationality: no sane person is going to initiate a first nuclear strike. There's no benefit for them. However greedy or irrational you might think politicians are, you can't be saying that the bulk of them are literally insane. You're saying they'd do it for oil, but who is going to think that initiating a nuclear conflict is going to win them oil?

The practically guaranteed risk of initiating a first nuclear strike in a nuclear-armed world is mutually assured destruction, and the threat of that is the point of having these weapons.

If you want to say that a person might take power in a nuclear-armed country who might want to usher in a nuclear apocalypse, be it to hasten Judgment Day or acquire virgins, fine. It's possible, even if there are many factors making it unlikely. What I take issue with is the idea that an administration would decide that an apocalypse is to their material benefit.
Well put good sir or madam, well put
 

Caligulove

New member
Sep 25, 2008
3,029
0
0
Hundreds of millennia away, when the future of mankind has long been extinct or expanded across the stars and other species have had their run at dominating the planet- long after the planet became barren of all life due to close proximity to the sun, Earth itself will be destroyed either by the expanding star or by it's cataclysmic explosion from a super nova. Returning that star stuff back to the cosmos from whence it came.

And maybe, some of that star stuff will meld and move its way along the galaxy. The Milky Way might collide with another galaxy in that time. And some part of the Earth we stand on will compact into another terrestrial or unknown planet, capable of life and compose another sentient organism that one day will also look out at the stars. The stuff of stars, contemplating the stars and their origins.

The same matter that was once us. There is only an end to the world as we know it.
 

NezumiiroKitsune

New member
Mar 29, 2008
979
0
0
I have no prevailing thoughts on how the world will be annihilated. Our orbit is stable, the sun isn't going to die before humanity do (assuming we don't colonise other planets or do something similar), so unless the planet is hit by an asteroid of vast size or humanity create a device powerful enough to obliterate the planet, the sun will enter red giant phase and consume the planet in 5 billion years assuming the pending collision with Andromeda doesn't remove the solar system from the galaxy in 4.5 billion years. The earth might survive that, it is predicted the galaxies will merge, but whether it could still be called a planet afterwards is completely uncertain.

How humanity could die would take a thesis so I'll just say "apathy" in my opinion.
 

Seieko Pherdo

New member
May 7, 2011
179
0
0
Well End Of Evangelion has been the coolest end of the world event I ever watched. Of course something else less interesting could happen I would just eat popcorn and watch as it happens.