This isn't a bad idea...TundraStalax said:
______________________________________________
Hmm... War... War never changes, but everything is radiated now ,so, there is nothing worth fighting over!
How do you think the fallout series should end?
- Thread starter spectrenihlus
- Start date
Recommended Videos
______________________________________________
Hmm... War... War never changes, but everything is radiated now ,so, there is nothing worth fighting over!
How about some evil guy hi-jacks the experiment thing and he talks to you while your in the fallout world and he plays around with you. It would be like that one black and white part of fallout 3. The evil guy should be like the batman joker... my idea interest me considering what the joker would do.Ironic Pirate said:
Never? No matter how much we build, we will always destroy. War. War never changes.
It ends for each person when they decide to stop buying the games.
It's such a compelling universe, and the first two games are such classics that I feel people will continue to reinvent them, perhaps in another round a few years in the future.
It ends for each person when they decide to stop buying the games.
It's such a compelling universe, and the first two games are such classics that I feel people will continue to reinvent them, perhaps in another round a few years in the future.
Personally, I think that's what's nice about the Fallout series as a whole, it doesn't have to end in any way. If you think about it, Fallout began with the end.
Look at it this way: Fallout came out in what, 1998? Fallout 2 not long after. Some of the best point-and-click role playing games ever. There were some crappy forgettable spiritual sequels, and then, ten years later, comes Fallout 3. It was essentially an FPS based on a medieval RPG, and it was pretty damn fantastic. As a long-time Fallout fan (Fallout was the first RPG I ever played, at the tender age of seven), it hit all the right continuity nods to keep me cheering most of the way through. Despite being on the other side of the fictional country, and having only one character actually appear from any other Fallout game.
New Vegas is going to be the same thing again. New settings, (Hopefully) enough references to the older games to keep it in the realms of the universe (Come on, who else spent a good time madly cheering when you saw that NCR flag in the first trailer?).
But I digress. Any "proper" ending is going to feel something of a cop out. The endings of the first game(s) properly ended, but also were left somewhat ambiguous as to whether or not what happens actually happened. Any final ending, where everything properly ends, would either be depressing (a new war/everybody fails in their bid for survival), overly glurgy (everybody lives happily ever after), or downright insulting to the fans (Harry Potter epilogue)
In short, don't end the series proper, just end whatever story arc you're currently working on.
Look at it this way: Fallout came out in what, 1998? Fallout 2 not long after. Some of the best point-and-click role playing games ever. There were some crappy forgettable spiritual sequels, and then, ten years later, comes Fallout 3. It was essentially an FPS based on a medieval RPG, and it was pretty damn fantastic. As a long-time Fallout fan (Fallout was the first RPG I ever played, at the tender age of seven), it hit all the right continuity nods to keep me cheering most of the way through. Despite being on the other side of the fictional country, and having only one character actually appear from any other Fallout game.
New Vegas is going to be the same thing again. New settings, (Hopefully) enough references to the older games to keep it in the realms of the universe (Come on, who else spent a good time madly cheering when you saw that NCR flag in the first trailer?).
But I digress. Any "proper" ending is going to feel something of a cop out. The endings of the first game(s) properly ended, but also were left somewhat ambiguous as to whether or not what happens actually happened. Any final ending, where everything properly ends, would either be depressing (a new war/everybody fails in their bid for survival), overly glurgy (everybody lives happily ever after), or downright insulting to the fans (Harry Potter epilogue)
In short, don't end the series proper, just end whatever story arc you're currently working on.
A G.E.C.K that big? That would kill everything on Earthspectrenihlus said:
When you find the G.E.C.K for the first time in the irradiated chamber, you get the option to fire it up at the spot.
It basicly sucks everything in and creates life outta that... Killing what ever was in that area
It doesn't need to end. Each game is separate from the rest and the time-line between Fallout and Fallout 3 is something like 150 years, with Fallout New Vegas being set slightly before and during the same time frame as the third game.
There are a lot of places and stories they could tell within the Fallout Universe, enough that they never need to have an "ending" to the setting.
There are a lot of places and stories they could tell within the Fallout Universe, enough that they never need to have an "ending" to the setting.
I don't think it should end. It's a great series that has plenty more potential.
Ooh, good point!Archindar said:
I dont see why everyone thinks Obsidian is worse then bethesda, I mean there was so much stuff removed from both the fallout series and oblivion when they made fallout 3, and if you look at the pre order weapons for new vegas you'll see they have poisons from oblivion, throwing weapons from the original fallouts and grenade launchers, also more weapons and unique weapons look unique. The reason alpha protocol was so bad is because they moved half the people working on alpha protocol to work on FO:NV.Crazycat690 said:
Yeah, I don't want it to end anyway. Living in the wastes is too much fun.MiracleOfSound said:
Besides, I always think of Fallout as "The epilogue game." You know, this is what happens after the war that ends everything. The whole thing is one big epilogue that keeps going.
with Black Isle studios reforming and taking the IP out of bethesdas fantasy themed hands and delivering a full version of van buren
They shouldn't have a new series based on the fallout universe if the world gets rebuilt. They should maybe have the protaganist sacrifice himself like in the the third game. But this time to help rebuild the world completely. Then end with a citscene and leave the rest up to your imagination.spectrenihlus said:
