yes i think we all agree quality can win over quantity but the opposite is also trueIcarion said:I direct both of you to the 6 day war of 1967. Prehaps the most amazing quality over quantity win of all.Merkavar said:quality usually comes out on top. so sometimes it doesnt. like say when your outnumbered 2 to 1?Rationalization said:What has history highlights shown people though? Quality usually comes out at top, I constantly hear about such and such defeated an army 3x-5x-10x as big as them because of better tactics and better weaponry.Merkavar said:quantity has a quality all of its own.
My whole points was trying to get you away from using extremes, apparently that failed.Kortney said:snip
"By the end of the wars in 1559, Habsburg Spain had been established as the premier power of Europe, to the detriment of France. In France, Henry II was fatally wounded in a joust held during the celebrations of the peace. His death led to the accession of his 15-year-old son Francis II, who in turn soon died. The French monarchy was thrown into turmoil, which increased further with the outbreak of the French Wars of Religion in 1562."Yeah I could tell that early in, especially when you started trying to suggest that Italy defeated France in the Italian Wars! Mental, hey?
Thats ok cause I've been told by others who have lived there all their life that it is a running joke for comedians and one UK news reporter actually saw it so much that he wrote and entire report about UK FF incidents in WW2 because he saw that the joke was happening so much. It is widespread, it is taken as fact and it does "reduce history of a culture down to sheer lies" as much as that site, as I get messages "Atleast my country doesn't FF everytime" when I interact with people from the UK and have US flag on my account. And of course France gets poked at, in the view of a lot of people the last few multi-nation wars France has either not held up what is expected of a country that as you put "The French have some of the best military victories in the World." or declined to enter. And I've already admitted that most of that website were lies or muddled to make it look like a French loss yet you continue to act as if I do. I have no idea why. Plus you contradicted yourself so I went with the one I could respond to, rather than the I'm not debating part.Well I've only lived in England for two years but I have never heard a joke on that. Not in person nor in the media. So I'm going to have to say you're wrong there.
Take some of what you and other people on the board, so far no one has responded to this conversation except for the first 2 people that started it. And you were the only one on Frances side. And do what with that you said, I have no idea what that means. Also, why say I'm disprespectful and ignorant then put a =) at the end? I got confused with that.I just found your attitude incredibly disrespectful and ignorant. I hope you take some of what I (and other people who are more intelligent than me) say on board. I apologise if I didn't understand how downright funny it all is. = )
Just what I was thinking when I read this topic.SimuLord said:"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein
It seems you get confused with a lot of things. I'm not going to bother trying to argue the point with someone who is completely disregarding historical events. There is no case for discussion here. Any amount of research will tell you how France are in no way shape or form a bad military power. Stay away from your mental websites and you might learn something.Rationalization said:Also, why say I'm disprespectful and ignorant then put a =) at the end? I got confused with that.
A drone might get though but you forget or don't know the real resin the Cold War cooled down.Atmos Duality said:I think you over-estimate our ability to stop stratospheric-level projectiles. Especially if they're lobbed at us by the dozens.Raregolddragon said:Iran will start it off by nuking the shit out the Hebrews which will cause a chain reaction of nuclear war leading up to China bombing the USA.
The USA missile shield will stop the China made A-bombs and then a nice retaliation and all of china will start to glow in the dark.
End result USA wins due to missile shield and other Classified tech with the other global powers getting very nervous at just how powerful the USA is.
Even a tactical nuke could be flown in under radar on an unmanned drone.
No..a nuclear war will end civilization as we know it.
Aren't 90% of Canadians already massed within 100 miles of the US border, poised to invade?misterprickly said:Two words...
Canada SNAPS!
![]()
How can the war in Iraq escalate? The only troops there now are US troops, and combat operations have ceased.Decum said:I personally think that the war in iraq will escalate and some other countries will join in, cause of the whole oil shortage problem, other countries will want in eventually, Russia wont join though, they're good for oil.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-invasion_Iraq,_2003%E2%80%93present#American_withdrawalWikipedia said:On August 19, 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama announced that all U.S.combat operations will end on August 31st. 50,000 troops will stay in an advise and assist role. The full withdrawal is given as scheduled for December, 2011.
Yeah I was having a look at the laser specifications and noticed that they had that capability. However as I have said there only so many laser available and I have the feeling that there are more nuukes. Yes it is true that the large superpowers have high powered officials that control and govern these sort Of issues, however they will prove their mettle when the time comes I guess, until then.iThinkCat said:The lasers actually are effective to serveral miles out and are even more effective in space (nullifying ICBMs). Also, they do not cause the warhead to expload or impload. In fact, they don't even target the warhead; they target the detonator. Without the detonator, the missle can not cause a nuclear chain reaction. If the missle still poses enough of a threat without the detonator, then they simply fry the engine with the laser.THEfog101 said:True True, very valid point. However lasers are only effective at a certain distance, nearly assured to be close enough to cause radioactive fallout pollution on a landmass, all it takes is this to fall on a town on the coast and now you have a whole population with Gamma exposure diseases and Beta burns. look at Chernobyl, 24 years on and still the animal populations in the area are heavily diseased and low on numbers (Still nothing compared to 2-3 years after the disaster itself). And its more than likely that in the process of defending their own country they are also going to be on the offensive and attack back, then allies are going to get involved on both side.mad825 said:snipTHEfog101 said:snip
The allies are going to utilize their nuclear capabilities and launch attacks as well. You can only defend against so many attacks at once before you are overwhelmed. And then your allies are going to continue firing against the hostiles until they are wiped out or have taken a enemy out, in the case they do take a enemy out then another will follow and destroy them and so on until there is nobody left and then BAMM! You have Metro or Fallout, where the surface is so highly irradiated that it cannot be immediately re-inhabited. So we will recover, we always have....... its in our nature.
Aside from the warhead being pascified, I highly doubt every nuclear missle out there isn't shielded with lead to prevent radiation leaks during containment. If they were all just sitting there in their launch tubes unprotected, then I think we would already be seeing these land and water contaminations popping up. You have to remember, we have the smartest people in the nation (not an exageration) creating these policies and tactics. Not to mention, a lot of the policies are governed, enforced, and developed internationally by people that may be even smarter than the people we host in our nation.
At this stage in technology, we do not have the luxury to overlook these issues. If we did, it could ensure the destruction of our entire race, and we are well aware of that.
Pretty much. This is all for when we finally get tired of people underestimating us. Feel the wrath of our Air Division! (Piloted by Polar Bears)Lord Monocle Von Banworthy said:Aren't 90% of Canadians already massed within 100 miles of the US border, poised to invade?misterprickly said:Two words...
Canada SNAPS!
![]()