If it comes down to it, the U.S. could start extracting the 12,000,000 tons of rare earths beneath our land. But the environmental damage would be catastrophic. The best hope would be for new recovery techniques that aren't as destructive to be developed. That's a cause I could see many billionaires like the Koch brothers getting behind.albino boo said:Err you are clearly not aware that the the main source for the minerals that are used to make solar cells is China. That well know freedom loving democracy that definitely does not shoot people down in the street for want to vote about who is in government. No country has all the natural resources required to run a modern economy within its borders. Last point due to fracking the US will be net exporter of oil and gas by 2019.secretkeeper12 said:Yeah, we'd need a nation of Al Gores and Carl Sagans to make this plan actually work. Still, this study proves it's entirely possible.
Perhaps if we pursued nuclear energy along with renewables, we could at least achieve energy independence in the next 3 1/2 decades. That would be preferable to the current set-up, financing all sorts of immoral government and business practices. Plus there's the fact that many solar and wind parts require the use of petroleum to create, making it all the more urgent we make them now.
I don't think anyone here is against nuclear energy. The report doesn't mention it, but that's mainly because its focus is on renewable energy, which uranium is not. Of course, we would need nuclear plants if we want a realistic chance of getting off fossil fuels, but the authors of this report seem to want to show 100% renewability is a possibility.Souplex said:What does everyone have against nuclear?
Nuclear has the most oomph, and it's clean.
Don't be anti-science.