How I learned to love the bomb

Recommended Videos

kaziard

New member
Oct 28, 2008
710
0
0
manaman said:
Greyfox105 said:
MaxTheReaper said:
"Momma always said, 'World War Three will be fought with nuclear weapons. World War Four will be fought with pointy sticks.'"
Kinda like what einstien said : "I know not what weapons with which world war 3 will be fought, but world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones".

or something along those lines.
Anyway, I like nukes :) lovely mushroom clouds. Potential for rapid mutations/evolution in the fallout zones of their use. I just can't help but love the pinnacle of Humanity's Gift for self-destruction :)

Edit: Oops, just found earlier post with einstein quote.
Ionizing radiation can break down DNA inside a persons cells, mostly this results in cell death, but in some cases it can do minor enough damage that all you would get is a terminal case of cancer. Mutation from radiation is a myth. Your bodies heals from the exposure, it kills your slowly, it kills you fast, it might even kill you softly with his song. It does not make you grow a flipper out of your ass.

Also while I do like the message of the quote, I hate it being attributed to Einstein. He never said it.
...technically it does mutate you i.e the cancer :) just not in the way he means.

no i dont think nukes should be around but there is no way of getting rid of them unless you pop a "happy pill" in every world leaders coffee in the mornings.
 

Unstoppable Wall

New member
May 12, 2009
256
0
0
Nukes eh? Well in a way they are wonderful weapons, devastating entire cities in seconds, yet for the same reason they are terrible. The fact that the people crazy enough to actually fire them have them is enough to keep the rest of the world at bay, so we live in a blissful ignorant cold war state and prepare to retaliate when in reality all you would have to do is bomb the damn stockpile and would ya look at that, you cant retaliate. I dunno, just what i think
 

Rolling Thunder

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,265
0
0
zoozilla said:
We're seriously depraved creatures to conceive of and construct a weapon that could wipe out millions of lives in an instant.
By who's standards?


My opinion is that the damn things are just another weapon. Like Aircraft, artillery, flamethrowers and gunpowder. We just need to figure out a countermeasure.
 

Eldritch Warlord

New member
Jun 6, 2008
2,901
0
0
Unstoppable Wall said:
Nukes eh? Well in a way they are wonderful weapons, devastating entire cities in seconds, yet for the same reason they are terrible. The fact that the people crazy enough to actually fire them have them is enough to keep the rest of the world at bay, so we live in a blissful ignorant cold war state and prepare to retaliate when in reality all you would have to do is bomb the damn stockpile and would ya look at that, you cant retaliate. I dunno, just what i think
Yeah, you don't know. Nuclear weapons can be detected before impact and aren't kept in a single stockpile.

My opinion: a necessary evil that has also brought about some good.
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
seamusotorain said:
unabomberman said:
We don't need them. At least not for anything other than scare the living shit of whatever "enemy" is in fashionable.
Ooh, China is the new thing, apparently!
Too bad they've got a shitload of nukes of their own.
 

Huey1000

New member
Oct 14, 2008
90
0
0
bue519 said:
sneakypenguin said:
I love them, wonderful deterrent, keeps cold wars from going hot, and makes a mighty fine explosion.
sabotstarr said:
only if aliens are coming to invade the earth. Other than that not more than 10 are needed for offensive and defensive tactics.
More than that, most counties could survive a 10 nuke strike, MAD is the goal in maintaining high stockpiles of nuclear weapons.
Yeah its just a shame when a fundimentalist state get ahold of them. *cough* Israel *cough*
Israel a fundamentalist state? So what the fck would you call Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia?! I forgot, liberals are so open-minded your brains fell out. Israel NEEDS nukes, so we can defend ourselves; and if we get bored we can take a plane ride and do a little crop-dusting.
 

TopHatTim

New member
Nov 8, 2008
713
0
0
sneakypenguin said:
I love them, wonderful deterrent, keeps cold wars from going hot, and makes a mighty fine explosion.
sabotstarr said:
only if aliens are coming to invade the earth. Other than that not more than 10 are needed for offensive and defensive tactics.
More than that, most counties could survive a 10 nuke strike, MAD is the goal in maintaining high stockpiles of nuclear weapons.
i disagree...if you nuke the 10 biggest cities in a country...your pretty fucked needing to send alot of military forces, aid and money into those 10 cities.


but i do agree more then 10 would be nice to kill the shit out of some aliens..
 

Unstoppable Wall

New member
May 12, 2009
256
0
0
Eldritch Warlord said:
Unstoppable Wall said:
Nukes eh? Well in a way they are wonderful weapons, devastating entire cities in seconds, yet for the same reason they are terrible. The fact that the people crazy enough to actually fire them have them is enough to keep the rest of the world at bay, so we live in a blissful ignorant cold war state and prepare to retaliate when in reality all you would have to do is bomb the damn stockpile and would ya look at that, you cant retaliate. I dunno, just what i think
Yeah, you don't know. Nuclear weapons can be detected before impact and aren't kept in a single stockpile.

My opinion: a necessary evil that has also brought about some good.
I see your point, honestly I didn't think there would be any country stupid enough to stockpile them in one place, but with the rate that all of humanity seems to be going...well lets just say i wouldn't doubt it
 

j0z

New member
Apr 23, 2009
1,762
0
0
I like nukes they serve a great purpose here.
What is it? Well, it kept the US from going to war with the USSR. If it wasn't for nukes that war would have definitely gone "hot". It is also a great deterrent in the world today. It keeps all the big nations that have nukes from going after each other, and most probably the big nations will never use them. I am more doubtful of the rogue nations like Iran and NK, but I also advocate showing them what happens when they decide that they want nukes.
BIG BADDA BOOM
(kudos if you get that reference)
Nothing left but a radioactive pit in the ground.
 

Biek

New member
Mar 5, 2008
1,629
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
"Momma always said, 'World War Three will be fought with nuclear weapons. World War Four will be fought with pointy sticks.'"
Your mom is Albert Einstein?

Edit: nevermind, my attempt at smartassery backfired. He said: "I don't know when world war III will be, but world war IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
 

Simalacrum

Resident Juggler
Apr 17, 2008
5,204
0
0
Nukes have to exist in todays society, now that they're here... its a horrible, horrible fact, I know, but its true. If two major opposing sides both have a stash of nuclear bombs, it can actually prevent a war, ironically enough... same reason why WWIII never happened during the Cold War, nobody in a major political position is stupid enough to take the risk.

If nukes were never invented, that would be a much more convenient alternative.
 

EMFCRACKSHOT

Not quite Cthulhu
May 25, 2009
2,973
0
0
Without nukes, conventional warfare would be rife. Right now, its a case of you attack me i destroy your country. They are all that keeps the status quo. Of course, the danger is when crackpot dictators get hold of them(i'm looking at you North Korea) because they are far more likely to use them
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
I hope to never see the FACE OF DEATH! Except in games because they are just for fun.