It's an advert that takes you to that site. Try using a different browser or something. As for the numbers, I found it kind of suspicious where they were getting these numbers, but hey they could have some way of knowing.TheBluesader said:First of all, I had to manually type the date in because the link kept taking me to some dating site. Am I infected, or is something up with this site?
I've also noticed that all the counts are around 145,000 people. Where are they getting these numbers? How do they calculate them? If that's just a standard estimate for how many people die worldwide every day, that isn't too impressive.
I checked several dates well-within World War II, and the numbers are actually a lot LOWER than later dates. Which tells me this is just a guesstimate based on population, not some kind of tally based on world wide events.
Sorry to rain on the parade, but the parade is highly suspect.
I don't know. The Internet doesn't exactly have a great reputation when it comes to honesty... [http://www.wikipedia.org/]flare09 said:It's an advert that takes you to that site. Try using a different browser or something. As for the numbers, I found it kind of suspicious where they were getting these numbers, but hey they could have some way of knowing.TheBluesader said:First of all, I had to manually type the date in because the link kept taking me to some dating site. Am I infected, or is something up with this site?
I've also noticed that all the counts are around 145,000 people. Where are they getting these numbers? How do they calculate them? If that's just a standard estimate for how many people die worldwide every day, that isn't too impressive.
I checked several dates well-within World War II, and the numbers are actually a lot LOWER than later dates. Which tells me this is just a guesstimate based on population, not some kind of tally based on world wide events.
Sorry to rain on the parade, but the parade is highly suspect.
Yeah, i got 31 of those lol.Rusty Bucket said:147,621. There were also 8 natural disasters that year.
Edit: The same website told me that i could take 18 90 year olds in a fight.
Heh, I got the original Bruce Lee. 20th of JulyPersianLlama said:149,335
Including the son of Bruce Lee! September 2nd 1993.
Hey, same birthdate.CheatMasta said:No, September 24thHunde Des Krieg said:April 13th?!CheatMasta said:146,983
A couple of earthquakes, and a magician who attempted being buried alive only for the cement covering his plastic box to crush the box and asphyxiate him.
You know how Wikipedia works right? It's actually a pretty credible source if you're smart about what you read.TheBluesader said:I don't know. The Internet doesn't exactly have a great reputation when it comes to honesty... [http://www.wikipedia.org/]flare09 said:It's an advert that takes you to that site. Try using a different browser or something. As for the numbers, I found it kind of suspicious where they were getting these numbers, but hey they could have some way of knowing.TheBluesader said:First of all, I had to manually type the date in because the link kept taking me to some dating site. Am I infected, or is something up with this site?
I've also noticed that all the counts are around 145,000 people. Where are they getting these numbers? How do they calculate them? If that's just a standard estimate for how many people die worldwide every day, that isn't too impressive.
I checked several dates well-within World War II, and the numbers are actually a lot LOWER than later dates. Which tells me this is just a guesstimate based on population, not some kind of tally based on world wide events.
Sorry to rain on the parade, but the parade is highly suspect.