KissingSunlight said:
OLAS said:
I don't know why you trying to be argumentative.
I disagree with your implied assertion on the detrimental effects of internet and smartphone usage, and am thus arguing against it. Did you not want anyone in the thread to disagree with you?
If I come across as salty, it's because your comments struck me as condescending, as in 'look at all these dumb bozos who so absorbed in their phones they run into stuff'.
I don't like to judge people I don't know based of what they do in 3 seconds of a youtube video, and I find it particularly obnoxious to call people "zombies" just because they choose to spend their free time using a certain device that you don't seem to care for.
KissingSunlight said:
First, saying that "it only took seconds to find" means that the subject that you were looking for is really popular. I have tried find things on search engines that took me a long time to find.
Yes, videos of people falling down and getting hurt tend to be popular. And it's also easy to compile separate footage into a short compilation to make something seem more frequent than it is in reality.
This only took a few seconds to find.
Anyway, I wasn't making the case that people never get hurt from being distracted while using phones, or even that people shouldn't pay attention to their surroundings during the less-than 1% of their day that they spend walking around an unfamiliar area. My point is that smartphones aren't the problem, not looking where you're going is the problem. Most people who use phones know when to put them away.
KissingSunlight said:
If people are reading books & walking, driving, etc. and not paying attention to where they are going; then, yes, I would call them "Book Zombies". That doesn't happen often enough to call people out on it. Seriously, how long would it take to find a video montage of people running into things while reading a book? I'm guessing a lot longer than it takes to find a video of people doing that with smart phones.
Ya, probably, but I don't see how that makes it any better. If anything reading a book is probably more distracting since it's a longer and deeper engagement.
Anyway, if your only point was that people should avoid distractions while engaged in other, more important activities, then we're in agreement. It just seems like one of the least audacious points you could make.