Dalisclock said:
and the knowledge that third parties have no chance of actually winning right now.
The sad thing it's that it's exactly this 'knowledge' that keeps third parties out. That reigning mentality of "They have no chance of winning, so I won't vote for them." That's how you get a self-fulfilling prophesy, it's self-defeating.
Hell, they don't even need to win at first. Enough people voting for a third party candidate would suddenly make it show up in the statistics. And that would draw the attention of the media, as a third party candidate suddenly drawing a sizable amount is quite a newsworthy fact. And
that would make that fact even more well-known among the populace, making a third party candidate suddenly a more serious possibility. Doesn't mean they'll win the first time around, but the next election it might be an entirely different story.
The problem with that "all or nothing" presidential system is that it fosters an "all or nothing" mindset that's not exactly healthy for the democratic process. I don't envy your living in the US.
Chimpzy said:
Pretty much, yes. There was a time when government formation took so long, we didn't have a democratically elected government for some 580 days[footnote]Probably the world record for a developed democracy. Yay us?[/footnote]. But we're so used to that kind of thing that the country has grown to pretty much run itself regardless.
Yup, we carry the record here. It'll never not be funny to me, but yet deeply troubling. Belgium has enough government to equip three countries. It's like a damn layer cake.