How smart are ya'?

Recommended Videos

irrelevantnugget

New member
Mar 25, 2008
807
0
0
Jaranja said:
Captain Pancake said:
Jaranja said:
Simriel said:
I have an I.Q of 162. I already AM smarter than 98% of the world.
I.Q tests measure how good you are at I.Q tests.
Well put. I don't like it when people brag about a high IQ.
Agreed.
Ninja'd. Agreed. It's also annoying when you end up making one, get a decent result, and people expect you to know every single question they fire at you. Then say you're not as smart you're making out to be when you don't know those ridiculous questions they pull out of their - oh, whoops. Lost it a bit there.
 

Jaranja

New member
Jul 16, 2009
3,275
0
0
Simriel said:
Jaranja said:
Simriel said:
I have an I.Q of 162. I already AM smarter than 98% of the world.
I.Q tests measure how good you are at I.Q tests.
I know, but given that there is no other way to actually measure intelligence it has to do. And there is a link between I.Q and actual intelligence. More intelligent people are more likely to have a higher score.
Lazy intelligent people (like myself) don't do well on them.
 

Littlee300

New member
Oct 26, 2009
1,742
0
0
Simriel said:
Souplex said:
ElephantGuts said:
Why do we care who owns the fish?
Because it is a logic puzzle. If you can figure it out then apparently you are smarter than 98% of the world. Don't you want to say you are smarter than 98% of the world?
I have an I.Q of 162. I already AM smarter than 98% of the world. Also, Your Momma owns the pet fish.
*slap for bad mom joke and huge ego*]
Anyways i did this quiz before, it was hard and i didnt feel like I accomplished much at the end, but that was a different one, i am gonna do a wild guess and say germany...
*slaps again with a fish* Your mother paid me this... (har har har your not only one with bad mom jokes)
 

StonkThis

New member
Aug 12, 2009
543
0
0
I forgot how to hide text so....

It never said it had to be one of the guys mentioned, so I'll go with the guy who owns the pet store... That has fish... He kind of owns it then... Go me. Probably wrong, but whatever.
 

Gebi10000

New member
Aug 14, 2009
475
0
0
solved it before. To lazy to do it again.It was the person who shared my nationality
 

Vespire

New member
Apr 15, 2009
53
0
0
forgot how to do spoilers so here i'll do this
*SPOILER ALERT* there is no fish *SPOILER ALERT*
there we go, you can congratz me later :p
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
Souplex said:
ElephantGuts said:
Why do we care who owns the fish?
Because it is a logic puzzle. If you can figure it out then apparently you are smarter than 98% of the world. Don't you want to say you are smarter than 98% of the world?
Not if it's this hard to prove.
 

D0WNT0WN

New member
Sep 28, 2008
808
0
0
It is the fish, I think?

I remember my Science teacher giving us this riddle.
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
Jaranja said:
Simriel said:
Jaranja said:
Simriel said:
I have an I.Q of 162. I already AM smarter than 98% of the world.
I.Q tests measure how good you are at I.Q tests.
I know, but given that there is no other way to actually measure intelligence it has to do. And there is a link between I.Q and actual intelligence. More intelligent people are more likely to have a higher score.
Lazy intelligent people (like myself) don't do well on them.
I do well in I.Q tests and often don't do well in academic tests. Those require work, and study. I too am a lazy genius.
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
Littlee300 said:
Simriel said:
Souplex said:
ElephantGuts said:
Why do we care who owns the fish?
Because it is a logic puzzle. If you can figure it out then apparently you are smarter than 98% of the world. Don't you want to say you are smarter than 98% of the world?
I have an I.Q of 162. I already AM smarter than 98% of the world. Also, Your Momma owns the pet fish.
*slap for bad mom joke and huge ego*]
Anyways i did this quiz before, it was hard and i didnt feel like I accomplished much at the end, but that was a different one, i am gonna do a wild guess and say germany...
*slaps again with a fish* Your mother paid me this...
Bad Mother jokes and a huge ego. Slap in a genius level intellect and you have yourself a good picture of me.
 

Zacharine

New member
Apr 17, 2009
2,854
0
0
Souplex said:
Please spoiler any serious answers.

Who owns the pet fish?
The Norwegian lives in the leftmost house, next to blue house. The owner of the center house drinks milk, and cannot therefore be green house whose owner has coffee for a drink. The gren house is position 4 as it is to the left of the white one and there is no other place for a pair of houses to fit the given clues. Thus, the center house is red and the Brit lives there. The Norwegians house must thus be yellow. The Dane drinks tea and so doesn't live in the coffee-drinking green house. The Swede raises dogs so he is not the one who owns horses. The identity of the Blue house is hence still unknown.

The man in the centermost house is the Brit and drinks milk. The green owner drinks coffee. The Dane drinks tea and so does not live there. The one who smokes Bluemasters drinks beer. Because the German smokes Prince, we know now that the German does not drink beer. We established already that the Brit drinks milk, so he cannot smoke Bluemasters. Since the Norwegian smokes Dunhills, he can't do the Bluemasters/Beer combo either. And the Dane drinks tea, resulting in the Swede having the beer.

The owner of the yellow house (Norwegian) smokes Dunhill. The German smokes Prince. The on who smokes Blends, has a neighbor who drinks water, and the green one drinks coffee. Hence, the person in the white house does not smoke Blends. The Dane can't smoke Bluemasters, since he drinks tea and not beer, as deducted before. The Brit drinks milk, so Bluemasters are out for him. The Norwegian doesn't smoke the Bluemasters either, since he smokes Dunhills. And the German smokes Prince, not Bluemasters. The only option is that the Swede smokes Bluemasters. Therefore, the Swede drinks beer, concurring the result of the drinks-deduction.

The man who keeps a horse, lives next door to the Dunhill smoker, who is the Norwegain, so the owner of the blue house has a horse. The Norwegian smokes Dunhills, so he does not have birds. The Swede keeps dogs, so he can't own horses and live in the blue house. Whomever smokes the Bluemasters, doesnt own birds.

When we realize that the Swede smokes Bluemasters, drinks ber and keeps dogs, we know everything except the colr of his house. He doesn't live in the red one because he drinks beer instead of milk. Nor does he live in the green house, as he does not drink coffee. He is not in the yellow house either, due to the Dunhills, and since he doesn't own a horse he isn't the owner of the blue one. So, he lives in the white house.

The blue house and the green house are still unknowns the Dane must be in the blue one drinking tea, because he doesn't drink coffee: therefore, he can not be in the green one. We already know that the Brit is the owner of the red house and the Norewgian is in the yelow house. So we can put the German into the green.

Based on this, we have the German drinking coffee and smoking Princes in the green house. The Swede is in the white, smoking Bluemasters and drinking beer with dogs keeping thirsty frat-students away. The Norwegian is in the yellow house, getting lung cancer from Dunhills. The Dane is in the blue house drinking tea and grooming a horse. Since he has a horse, he can't have birds and therefore doesn't smoke Pall Malls, but Blends. The Brit is in the red house drinking milk.

Since the Dane, inside the blue house, smokse Blends, his neighbor must drink water. The house next door belongs to the Brit who already drinks milk. So the Norwegian on the other side must be the one who drinks water. We know what everyone smokes (but the Brit) who by default smokes Pall Malls, and hence also owns birds.

Since he owns the birds, the neighbor of the Blends smoker (who has cats) is the Norwegian, leaving only one outcome:

The German owns the fish.

Did I get it right? It is possible I have a mistake there somewhere as I did this in a bit of a hurry, but I did play this out on paper and it seems to fit.
 

Jaranja

New member
Jul 16, 2009
3,275
0
0
Simriel said:
Jaranja said:
Simriel said:
Jaranja said:
Simriel said:
I have an I.Q of 162. I already AM smarter than 98% of the world.
I.Q tests measure how good you are at I.Q tests.
I know, but given that there is no other way to actually measure intelligence it has to do. And there is a link between I.Q and actual intelligence. More intelligent people are more likely to have a higher score.
Lazy intelligent people (like myself) don't do well on them.
I do well in I.Q tests and often don't do well in academic tests. Those require work, and study. I too am a lazy genius.
Aha, fair enough. *E-hug*
 

RyQ_TMC

New member
Apr 24, 2009
1,002
0
0
A group of my coursemates and I once got this as a "test". We all got it right. And I'm reluctant to believe that we are all in the top 2%.

Also, I hate all the "how smart are you" tasks with a passion. Mostly because they focus on very specific abilities and aren't actually a measure of one's overall aptitude in reasoning, critical thinking, spotting patterns, whatever other skill might be a measure of one's brain power.

It's up to you how well you do in life. IQ doesn't matter as much as people believe.
 

Fenwolf2003

New member
Nov 19, 2009
49
0
0
Who cares? I'd rather be smart and lazy than smart and obsessively so. I know I'm pretty smart, any time I ever tried to work on my exams I scored amazingly so, but I honestly don't care enough to try. I'd rather just sleep and relax, got enough problems to think about a fish.

I think the reason a lot of people can't get this is cause it is long. If you wrote it all out carefully the answer would be bleeding obvious but I'd rather play Ghostbusters.