How to finally win a war.
- Thread starter sabotstarr
- Start date
Recommended Videos
good point. minus a heavy winter my theory sounds like blubbering nonsense. So ya i see your point.the protaginist said:
GASP stop eating. But think of it for a moment and find an example of two equally sided nations and see which one came out on top, the northern one or the southern one?Valiance said:
The left sucks, its just like France, but idk whoever has more people up north wins in my historically proved insight.mangus said:
1. you are proposing that a single northern nation can amass a large enough army to overwhelm the world in a single winter.sabotstarr said:
2.Sweden was neutral during the war and Finland had a debatable stalemate with Russia. Areas around Leningrad was only given to Russia due to the USSR troops occupying there. They weren't conquered anyway.
3. Nordic members of the EU is currently stripping down its army due to high maintenance cost
4. Scenario: Would the Greenland army beat the South African army? Both tips of the globe share the same climate
Germany didn't lose because russia was towards the North.
Look on a world map and compare the size of Germany to Russia... Russia is a LOT bigger than Germany, isn't it? The Russian people resisted so violently that Germany couldn't win the war. Not to mention Stalingrad!
Also, Russia is to the East and North of Germany.
Look on a world map and compare the size of Germany to Russia... Russia is a LOT bigger than Germany, isn't it? The Russian people resisted so violently that Germany couldn't win the war. Not to mention Stalingrad!
Also, Russia is to the East and North of Germany.
France is to the west, Russia is to the east.sabotstarr said:
Hitler, i.e. Germany, didnt care about France, Britain or anything to the west, he cared about the HUGE amount of land that happened to be called Eastern Europe.
Russia did really badly against Finland because of the poor equipment and training of the troops. It was that war that made Stalin purge and reorganise the Red Army which led to the eventual Allied victory, even though the Reds were missing most of their most experienced commanders because of the purges.
Damn, I love history.
I've been reading your post over and over and I still don't know what the fuck you're saying. Are you trying to say that when two countries fight, the northernmost one wins?
What?
You are aware that Russia isn't to the North of Germany right?
And Finland isn't to the North of Russia?
I don't know what you heard but there are four directions. Two of them are East and West. I think you are confusing those for North and South.
What?
You are aware that Russia isn't to the North of Germany right?
And Finland isn't to the North of Russia?
I don't know what you heard but there are four directions. Two of them are East and West. I think you are confusing those for North and South.
in your WW2 analogy, you are forgetting that Germany conquered Denmark, Poland, Norway, Hollan, Belgium, and the Netherlands, several of which are to the north of it.sabotstarr said:
also, the Germans and Italians combined captured but failed to hold on to north Africa, and when the Western Allies' invasion of Italy was well underway, the Germans invaded italy too, and once again failed to hold it.
lastly, the Japanese Kicked the Britisher's collective arses early on during their involvement in the war, before the U.S.A. joined. they did this through the taking of the Phillipenes (sp?) and the sinking of the flagship HMS Prince of Wales.