This is what we call a storm "cycling". Again, both vortexes are linked to the same parent rotation (and covered by the same Tornado Warning), and in this case Rockwall/Hunt County tornado was replacing the Forney tornado. They did not strike the same locations: as one dissipated, the other touched down separately. Both tornadoes were briefly on the ground at the same time, but did not cover the same ground. Had someone in the area attempted to evacuate before the storm struck (which again, would not have been the correct decision in this case as these were not "get underground or die" tornadoes), they would have only had to escape the area of the warning polygon to be completely safe from both tornadoes associated with that Supercell. They would have then had to travel a considerable distance to get back in front of another tornadic storm and put themselves back in danger.Lil devils x said:I was travelling from the Mesquite hospital region through the Forney medical center region during this, and encountered the f3 and the underreported f2 in Forney during this I have seen pictures of both funnels. The area hit with the f3 in forney is near the rockwall/forney border, and many first responders to diamond creek and residents reported seeing both funnels at the same time. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/fwd/?n=april32012forneyEllie O said:None of the storms in the outbreak you linked to are the kind for which you should evacuate your location. In every situation during the April 3, 2012 outbreak, sheltering in place in a permanent structure is the correct decision. And this illustrates my previous point: no location in this saw more than one tornado over the course of the day. There was an initial group of supercells that moved across the area, producing mostly EF0-EF2 tornadoes as they went, followed by a squall line. Dallas-Fort Worth itself had only a single supercell, followed shortly by the squall line.
Why are we continuing to waste each others' time with this back and forth?