Housebroken Lunatic said:
No, I don't, because I did include passages from the NEW TESTAMENT, that pretty much sums it all up that no Christian (not even "sensible" ones) are allowed to ignore the law as it is written in the old testament. In fact they aren't even allowed to interpret it in a personal manner, but have to accept and adhere to EVERYTHUNG written in the old testament weether they fucking like it or not.
Christians are allowed to interpret the bible in their own way, that's one of the main ideas behind Protestantism and the resulting rash of different denominations. My point is that by failing to consider the circumstances under which the passage was written you're assuming Christians are stupid enough to act like some Sci-fi religious race and just believe anything they're told. in Europe there's a long tradition of allegorical or subjective interpretations, being able to google-fu a passage or two that glorifies killing proves nothing.
And if by "disservice" you mean promoting antagonism towards christianity, then im glad I could do just that. The more intolerance of religion I can cause by using religion against itself, the better.
but you're not, you're comparing old rules to new rules. Frankly I don't know anyone who worships Jesus and doesn't interpret the Bible. Also, finding a few thousand-year-old passages that contradict each other in an amalgamated book is
not fighting Religion; anyone who's read the Bible seriously knows that several of the passages are repeats of earlier ones (Jesus feeds a crowd magically twice) or meaningless without other missing texts. Every sensible Christian uses the Bible as food for thought rather than as a rigid rulebook, managing to outwit idiots isn't anything to cheer about.