Fat acceptance is an anti discrimination movement aimed at creating laws that punish people for discriminating against the overweight, I am completely against this.
Advocates of fat acceptance protest that some fat people are born fat and can not change their overweight appearance. I feel that they are using this as a scapegoat; the percentage of the population that is overweight for their genes is nowhere near the percentage of the obese that are fat because they eat unhealthy or don't exercise.
They also claim that diets don't work (which I agree) and state that nobody that goes under a diet for five years will come out healthier while fat discrimination originates from the weight loss companies. I can sympathise that these people have tried and failed many diets but to be a member of their organisation you do not need any proof that your weight is the result of genes and not a lack of exercise and poor eating. I believe that these people are demonizing the weight loss industry without taking the alternative of five years of healthy eating and regular exercise.
As soon as the fat acceptance movement makes it compulsory that members must prove that they can not lose weight I will give them credibility; but until then I believe that many disheartened obese people will use this as an excuse after they find that they don't have the willpower for regular exercise, after all a lack of will power is why so many people are obese in the first place.
I know that discriminating against the few who are legitimately fat is wrong but I would rather that than give the majority of fat people a false belief that their condition is not destroying their body.
Do you agree that fat acceptance is wrong or am I discriminating?
Now for something completely different...
Sex selection where a mother chooses the gender of their child is allowed in the U.S and banned in Australia. The Australian government has banned it on the grounds of avoiding a disproportionate population such as the case of China. Advocates of sex selection believe that it is a personal freedom the government is robbing from them.
There are also extreme cases where mothers would end up with eight children before they got the gender they wanted or would abort their child because they were of the wrong gender. The other side of these cases is that some mothers believe that they want a gender for their child but when they receive the wrong gender find that they are happy regardless and managed to avoid paying thousands of dollars for gender selection.
So should gender selection be legal or banned?
Advocates of fat acceptance protest that some fat people are born fat and can not change their overweight appearance. I feel that they are using this as a scapegoat; the percentage of the population that is overweight for their genes is nowhere near the percentage of the obese that are fat because they eat unhealthy or don't exercise.
They also claim that diets don't work (which I agree) and state that nobody that goes under a diet for five years will come out healthier while fat discrimination originates from the weight loss companies. I can sympathise that these people have tried and failed many diets but to be a member of their organisation you do not need any proof that your weight is the result of genes and not a lack of exercise and poor eating. I believe that these people are demonizing the weight loss industry without taking the alternative of five years of healthy eating and regular exercise.
As soon as the fat acceptance movement makes it compulsory that members must prove that they can not lose weight I will give them credibility; but until then I believe that many disheartened obese people will use this as an excuse after they find that they don't have the willpower for regular exercise, after all a lack of will power is why so many people are obese in the first place.
I know that discriminating against the few who are legitimately fat is wrong but I would rather that than give the majority of fat people a false belief that their condition is not destroying their body.
Do you agree that fat acceptance is wrong or am I discriminating?
Now for something completely different...
Sex selection where a mother chooses the gender of their child is allowed in the U.S and banned in Australia. The Australian government has banned it on the grounds of avoiding a disproportionate population such as the case of China. Advocates of sex selection believe that it is a personal freedom the government is robbing from them.
There are also extreme cases where mothers would end up with eight children before they got the gender they wanted or would abort their child because they were of the wrong gender. The other side of these cases is that some mothers believe that they want a gender for their child but when they receive the wrong gender find that they are happy regardless and managed to avoid paying thousands of dollars for gender selection.
So should gender selection be legal or banned?