This isn't exactly the same situation. This is in regard to a vendor who sends something completely unsolicited and then tries to collect payment. The law above would apply if Dell just sent you a computer without you ever even going to their site/calling them; and then they tried to bill you for it.Matt_LRR said:http://consumerist.com/2009/02/dsws-dirty-trick-backfires-now-customer-has-free-shoes.html
Here it is, the FTC's unordered merchandise rule:
Unordered Merchandise
Whether or not the Rule is involved, in any approval or other sale you must obtain the customer's prior express agreement to receive the merchandise. Otherwise the merchandise may be treated as unordered merchandise. It is unlawful to:
1. Send any merchandise by any means without the express request of the recipient (unless the merchandise is clearly identified as a gift, free sample, or the like); or,
2. Try to obtain payment for or the return of the unordered merchandise.
Merchants who ship unordered merchandise with knowledge that it is unlawful to do so can be subject to civil penalties of up to $11,000 per violation. Moreover, customers who receive unordered merchandise are legally entitled to treat the merchandise as a gift. Using the U.S. mails to ship unordered merchandise also violates the Postal laws.
They have been tainted...Unfortunately.Amund said:It has a decent graphics card in it, and 7 gigs of RAM.... should those too be destroyed?Sheepzor said:It's a dell destroy it and do the world a favour ^^
The rule still applies. He has cancelled his order, they have refunded his money, they are aware that he no longer wishes to receive the product. If they still send it, then they are sending it unsolicited and without permission. The cancellation of the order implies revocation of permission to charge for this merchandise.Nuke_em_05 said:This isn't exactly the same situation. This is in regard to a vendor who sends something completely unsolicited and then tries to collect payment. The law above would apply if Dell just sent you a computer without you ever even going to their site/calling them; and then they tried to bill you for it.Matt_LRR said:http://consumerist.com/2009/02/dsws-dirty-trick-backfires-now-customer-has-free-shoes.html
Here it is, the FTC's unordered merchandise rule:
Unordered Merchandise
Whether or not the Rule is involved, in any approval or other sale you must obtain the customer's prior express agreement to receive the merchandise. Otherwise the merchandise may be treated as unordered merchandise. It is unlawful to:
1. Send any merchandise by any means without the express request of the recipient (unless the merchandise is clearly identified as a gift, free sample, or the like); or,
2. Try to obtain payment for or the return of the unordered merchandise.
Merchants who ship unordered merchandise with knowledge that it is unlawful to do so can be subject to civil penalties of up to $11,000 per violation. Moreover, customers who receive unordered merchandise are legally entitled to treat the merchandise as a gift. Using the U.S. mails to ship unordered merchandise also violates the Postal laws.
This was an ordered product. It could have been the right hand of billing and the left hand of shipping weren't talking (cost of outsourcing to multiple countries, folks). So, the above law might apply, but it isn't the situation it was intended for.
I'm not a lawyer though, you should seek professional consultation if you wish to pursue that avenue.
OT: I'd call Dell if I were you.
Yeah I would probably think that way too ... then again its to good to be true, just in case let them know ... better safe than sorry.Cpt_Oblivious said:Well if the funds have been returned a week ago and they're only just sending it now then they clearly want you to have it.
Checked out the FTC site for consumers:Matt_LRR said:The rule still applies. He has cancelled his order, they have refunded his money, they are aware that he no longer wishes to receive the product. If they still send it, then they are sending it unsolicited and without permission. The cancellation of the order implies revocation of permission to charge for this merchandise.Nuke_em_05 said:SnipMatt_LRR said:Snip
I wouldn't take my word for it, but I'm pretty certain the rule would generalize to this situation.
-m
So, it looks like it applies as an honest shipping error (unless they try to bill you again, then it gets fun); but you do have to notify them and they can't charge you to ship it back.Q. What should I do if the unordered merchandise I received was the result of an honest shipping error?
A. Write the seller and offer to return the merchandise, provided the seller pays for postage and handling. Give the seller a specific and reasonable amount of time (say 30 days) to pick up the merchandise or arrange to have it returned at no expense to you. Tell the seller that you reserve the right to keep the merchandise or dispose of it after the specified time has passed.