Charli said:
shrekfan246 said:
You'd expect nerds who grew up being bullied because of stupid social standards would want to encourage bucking the trends rather than reinforcing them for a new generation, and bullying the people trying to buck them in the process.
Trauma and fear are powerful deterrents to encourage others to step into line. You can claim it didn't phase you much but some of them have gone through alot and don't want it for their kids.
On the other hand, people who were bullied and grew up to become well-meaning, balanced, productive members of society should be able to recognize that being bullied doesn't mean the end of the world. In some cases it can even become the burning inspiration for somebody to better themselves.
We can speculate and postulate about the future as much as we want, but at the end of the day none of us knows what's going to happen. Trying to keep someone in a metaphorical bubble as they grow up won't help them any more than giving them free reign to do as they please. To bring it back around to the original subject, trying to minimize the potential mockery someone might receive for something like their name by giving them a rote name isn't really any better than making them stand out by giving them a ridiculous name.
However each generation changes, and its something in the blind panic to protect and care for children that is quickly forgotten. It's nothing you should scorn, it's a powerful emotion and one not easily seen through with clarity.
I'm not scorning any attempt from parents to protect their children from the vile, ugly nature of the world. While I believe that many things while growing up are woefully inadequately designed to prepare children for "the real world", I wouldn't deprive them of the wonderment of
being children, either.
What I'm scorning is the patronizing guise of protecting children that people who don't have them adopt on the internet. Making sweeping assumptions that one odd thing is going to make a child's life hell, that they're guaranteed to be relentlessly mocked and bullied as they grow up, when there's just no way we can actually know that. It doesn't matter what happened when we were growing up, and we shouldn't be trying to force archaic standards upon children, especially other peoples' children, out of some misguided belief that it will keep them from being bullied or something, when they could just as easily be bullied for a multitude of other reasons.
For instance my parents were notorious trouble makers, and therefore pretty much stifled me and my siblings from ever taking risks or doing anything dangerous. Why? They knew the consequences, never considering that actually it might have some detrimental effects, like diminished self confidence.
The same thing happened to me. Which is exactly why I think children should receive guidance, rather than commands.
Bad things will happen. It's basically a fact of life. While we can fight it every step of the way, there's nothing I can foresee humans ever being able to do to completely remove that from a child's life. The bad things should be turned into learning experiences, for the sake of growth. Every little thing doesn't needed to be blunted out of a fear of scarring someone, and they should be able to forge their own identity.
You want the best for your children. That's all a parent tries to do. And often you can't see the trees for the forest regarding that.
And honestly, I won't deny that my views could very likely change whenever I have a child of my own. It's entirely possible, hell, maybe even probable given my personality. But I'd like to think I wouldn't do something like name my child "Tom" out of a fear of stepping outside of societal norms. (Though perhaps not the best example since I do actually quite like the name Tom and Thomas, the point is more that it's generally acknowledged as a "socially acceptable" name.)