I Hate Emoticons

Recommended Videos

Spade Lead

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,042
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
What's the problem with emoticons? Used properly and sparingly, they're an important part of internet discourse; voice tone does not transfer well over text, at least not without writing multiple pages of it just to get the point across. Forum posts, even the really long ones, are a lot shorter form than that, and emoticons are occasionally useful. Think about it -- they prevent a lot of flamewars, because they can be the difference between an ad hominem attack, and a harmless joke.

Edit: Think about how books are written. They're full of little comments like "'Nice hat' he said, his voice dripping with sarcasm." Emoticons fill in the "his voice dripping with sarcasm" part a lot better than going Nice hat, or worse, *sarcastically*Nice Hat*sarcastically*. Doesn't "Nice hat XD" just work better?
How does XD convey sarcasm? I post like I write for my novel, "You are so smart," he said sarcastically. Or, if I am really feeling snarky " You are so smart, Jackass." But XD conveys neither of those emotions to me.
 

Bugerion

New member
Jan 10, 2011
253
0
0
I use xD and :p most although people don't seem to understand what :p means which I find kind of weird
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
MarkDavis94 said:
Cowabungaa said:
MarkDavis94 said:
I can live with people using them apart from 1

:')

The happy crying face FUCK OFF it annoys me so much
It basically means "Oh god you must be kidding me, that's so freakin' sad/stupid/retarded." Sort of like a facepalm.
Maybe so but where I live the frequency of its use is irritating, people literally use it after anything
'oh my gawd I went to the shop and bought some hubba bubba :')'

UURRRGGGHHHH
Yeah that makes very little sense. Difference with most non-verbal communication, is that a lot of it goes neigh-automatically. Quite different with emoticons, and if you spam them too much their message fades away and people get annoyed.
 

hypovolemia

New member
Mar 25, 2011
86
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
See, when I see "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend." the period looks like the guy isn't all that excited about it; if you type it as "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend!" it shows excitement, but it's the kind of excitement that implies cheering, not the kind that shows someone is happy that their girlfriend is coming over. However, if you type it as "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend =D" the exact mood intended is conveyed in the text.
That wasn't a particularly good example on my part. I might be able to come up with something better if I were actually in his position and/or cared enough. Anyway, humans have written letters (and novels or poems) for quite a long time. I'm pretty sure that they managed without emoticons. As I said, they are not necessary, just very easy and quick to use. I acknowledge that, but that doesn't mean I have to like them.

Sure, 12 year olds use emoticons, but when used properly it doesn't have to make you look like one. That's like saying 12 year olds use microphones when playing games online, so anyone using a microphone looks like a 12 year old -- or like saying 12 year olds play videogames, and adults shouldn't, for that matter.
It doesn't make any sense, but it doesn't have to, because it's not a conscious act, but an association. When you say "water" some people will immediately think of fire, others of ice. Same thing. And I find your answer very confusing. Please don't try to fry my brain.

Edit: Also, seeing a smiley face in a post directed at me makes me feel like the writer is trying to mock me. Another weird association.
Edit: Also, that 90% figure is a well known case of hyperbole. If it was 90%, written language wouldn't work at all.
I just looked that up. It's only applicable in a certain (very specific) context. Very interesting, but not necessarily a hyperbole. But yeah, still wrong.
 

370999

New member
May 17, 2010
1,107
0
0
Isb't most of real life communication non-verbal? So emoticons can help getting across whetever you are being sarcastic or serious or what. I do agree that when people add them in completely superflously (Is that a word and did I spell it right? I think one of the answers is no)
 

Ice Car

New member
Jan 30, 2011
1,980
0
0
SlasherX said:
Snake Plissken said:
SlasherX said:
Doesn't it annoy the shit out of you.
Improper punctuation annoys the shit out of me even more. Doesn't it annoy the shit out of you?
Grammar Nazis annoy the shit out of me don't they annoy the shit out of you?
Umadbro? n_n

And way to ignore all the on-topic responses for that one. >_>
 

JET1971

New member
Apr 7, 2011
836
0
0
..i.. O.- ..i..

Emoticons are not new created during the internet age. fact is they predate the internet and electric typewriters. they dont bother me unless they are those large ones that space the lines by 2 or more.
 

Feste the Jester

New member
Jul 10, 2009
649
0
0
Soylent Bacon said:
I just hate this one:

:3

Good fucking God, do I hate that one!
What does that one even mean?

OT: I like using them on occasion for some conveyance of tone over the internet. Also, because I like the penguin <(").
 

Ice Car

New member
Jan 30, 2011
1,980
0
0
Snake Plissken said:
SlasherX said:
Snake Plissken said:
SlasherX said:
Doesn't it annoy the shit out of you.
Improper punctuation annoys the shit out of me even more. Doesn't it annoy the shit out of you?
Grammar Nazis annoy the shit out of me don't they annoy the shit out of you?
Not when they're only kidding around and making jokes that shouldn't get anybody all bent out of shape. I suppose an emoticon could have clarified my original post.
Lmao. I think the TC seriously needs to take a chill pill. ^_^
 

SillyNilly

New member
Sep 17, 2009
150
0
0
Come on Op, lighten up. :)

I can understand being annoyed by the overuse of emoticons,

:):):):):):):)

but they serve a practical purpose if used wisely! Anonymity on the internet makes it hard to understand emotions and mannerisms.

Besides, this is the only cool emoticon, useful for any situation. Found someone using it on deviantART.

/)^o^(\ Ohmygosh ohmygosh ohmygosh!

This thread is now 20% cooler.
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
hypovolemia said:
Anyway, humans have written letters (and novels or poems) for quite a long time.
There's a huge difference in writing a letter and having a conversation, and only since Instant Messaging has been invented we've really been able to have conversations through text. And it's in conversations that emoticons find their use, as a crude replacement for non-verbal communication.
 

Tulks

New member
Dec 30, 2010
317
0
0
Catchy Slogan said:
Only when they are overused/ used in the wrong way. For example, A ' :p ' can show that you are trying to make a joke with your statment, and since you can't pass the tone/ inflection of your voice over the internet, it becomes a valuable tool.
This. In fact, :p and ;p are pretty much the only ones I use, and only when I'm concerned that word choice hasn't sufficiently conveyed my intended tone.
 

Klarinette

New member
May 21, 2009
1,173
0
0
Soylent Bacon said:
I just hate this one:

:3

Good fucking God, do I hate that one!
Yeeeah, I really hate that one. Also this: ^_^; or whatever. Is that a sweat drop or something?

Emoticons annoy me the most when people add noses, though: :)
 

nifedj

New member
Nov 12, 2009
107
0
0
Emoticons are useful when you want to have something resembling a conversation online. We don't describe our speech the way we might in books, so when chatting to people it's a nice, shorthand way of expressing your tone/meaning.
 

Thaius

New member
Mar 5, 2008
3,862
0
0
I put emoticons on the same level as things like "lol" and "brb." Overuse of them is irritating, yes, but they are part of the way our language has developed in response to the creation of the internet, and it's traceable and understandable as to why it developed in this way. Overuse of them implies a lack of ability to express oneself effectively, but they are the results of natural evolution of a language to cope with social, cultural, and technological advancement, and there is nothing wrong with using them. Condemning them all on principle is kind of stupid.
 

Falconsgyre

New member
May 4, 2011
242
0
0
Emoticons are fine and all, but...

Don't you miss actually having to learn how to write in a way that conveys emotion instead of relying on conversational crutches?
 

GingieAle

New member
May 2, 2011
55
0
0
I do use them sometimes. Like this one: :D or D: but thats usually only when I'm being a dumb ass joking around, which is pretty much all the time on the internet.

I do however love to use what I like to call verbal emoticons. Example: I am happy face, I am angry face, I am sad face.. You can also use variations of them. Some variations of sad face could be: I am not happy face right now, I am depression face, I am emo face, as well as: I am anger face, I am rage face and I am pissed off face, as variations for angry face. You can also use them as: That is awesome face or that is not happy face.

I use them all the time and have somehow influenced my friends into using them. I hope to infect the internet with my own retarded slang.
 

Ice Car

New member
Jan 30, 2011
1,980
0
0
falconsgyre said:
Emoticons are fine and all, but...

Don't you miss actually having to learn how to write in a way that conveys emotion instead of relying on conversational crutches?
Hm, I suppose we should all be very obvious with our sarcasm so we don't have to use an emoticon. Great idea! :3