Take my money, I want that game.nukethetuna said:How about a compromise!
I want it now...
Take my money, I want that game.nukethetuna said:How about a compromise!
Hey super peach was good ( you are talking about that ds game right?). But umm what was you argument exactly ? You just posted games that featured female prtagonists with guns... Does having a female protagonist ( with guns) make it a girl game? I personally don't believe there are girl games or guy games , just games.TheDarkEricDraven said:I hate this woman so much. How can someone can be so...gaaah. Sorry, Samus Aran! Laura Croft! Joanna Dark! You guys don't exist anymore! The only "girl games" are Barbies Horse Adventures and Super Princess Peach!
If other women agreed with her, yes. But a lot of women happen to love action heavy games, as well as many other types.kman123 said:Well...she just pulled back on 20 years of gaming progress in the female gender.
But thats not at all what this thread is about :/TheDarkEricDraven said:My point was that Joanna, Samus, and Laura are all empowering female figures.krazykidd said:Hey super peach was good ( you are talking about that ds game right?). But umm what was you argument exactly ? You just posted games that featured female prtagonists with guns... Does having a female protagonist ( with guns) make it a girl game? I personally don't believe there are girl games or guy games , just games.TheDarkEricDraven said:I hate this woman so much. How can someone can be so...gaaah. Sorry, Samus Aran! Laura Croft! Joanna Dark! You guys don't exist anymore! The only "girl games" are Barbies Horse Adventures and Super Princess Peach!
Well I think the point of her comment was to make a non-violent game that the stereotypical girl would find appealing, so I'm pretty sure my statement still stands.Tree man said:The year is 2088, only you can stand in the face of the nano-machine armies, use your wand of death to create hunterkiller butterflies, then set your army of butterlies up with sparkle cannons and let them loose, you are dalec drason, and you are humanities last hope against the machines....Thaius said:Well she's not entirely wrong, just woefully ignorant about how these games work. I mean you could certainly make an incredible game out of that concept, but how would you contextualize it? What's the story? Why are you turning things into sparkly butterflies? How does that factor into the bigger picture of the gameplay? It's certainly a viable gameplay concept, but to simply say "replace guns and blood with magic wands and sparkles" is extremely ridiculous and simply demonstrates an intense lack of understanding of this medium and how it works. But at least that misunderstanding isn't extending to the same lengths to which most people take it.
I'd buy it.
**laughs** Okay, now I want this game!The Heavy Metal Nerd said:"As you know, most of us females just hate those action video games," she said. "You don't have to use shooting. You can use, for example, a princess which has a magic wand and whenever she touches something, it turns into a butterfly and sparkles."
Furthermore, the article in question was about research she'd conducted which said action-heavy games actually IMPROVED vision and brain functions.
Exactly. It sounds like she's cheaply satirizing someone who actually made a sound argument against videogame violence. Apparently she's serious, so...NinjaDeathSlap said:Um, hate to break this to you Daphne, but just because you have ovaries does not mean your sentiments are shared by every other female on the planet.
Ironically, if it wasn't for violent video games having used up all my aggression, I'd probably be plotting her murder right about now...
Just read that. She basically called men unintelligent, and claimed women were all pacifists.Mischa87 said:Funny no one made a reference to this:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/112508-Silicon-Sisters-Say-Game-Industry-Still-Doesnt-Understand-Women
Seems like they were cut from the same cloth eh?