BonsaiK said:
By St. Anger nobody cared about what Metallica did, they'd ceased to be influential by that point so it didn't matter that it sucked. When St. Anger wasn't worth a nutsack it surprised nobody. But in 1991 Metallica were the flag-bearers of metal and the hotly-anticipated Black Album had an incredibly negative effect on heavy metal at the time, at least for me. Other bands that were up until that point experimenting with songs structure threw all that away when they saw the Black Album and started copying it instead, basically just making mid-tempo pop songs with heavy guitar, which is all The Black Album is. I saw my school friends who were Metallica fans literally crying when that album came out, not because it wasn't heavy (because it in fact was) but because it was structurally just pop music. Because of this I didn't think The Black Album was good heavy metal as it seemed like a vastly retrograde step, retreating from the boundaries the band were previously pushing, but on the other hand I didn't think Metallica made much of a pop record either, I just don't think the songs were that good. I stress of course as I have done in previous posts in this thread that this is just my personal take on it, if other people like it, and they obviously do, they're welcome to it.
Not sure what criteria you're using when elevating Britney and Backstreet Boys above Kesha and Beiber, musically there's little to no difference. Rest assured that if the Escapist's hate threads were around 12 years ago it'd be Britney etc who would be getting the same consistent uninformed bashing all the time that Beiber gets these days. People just like to bash what's extremely popular right now, and right now Beiber and Kesha are on top of the pop tree. When they cease to be the latest pop stars of concern for young people something else newer will get bashed instead.
Before I say anything, can I please ask that people stop doing this lukewarm "every opinion has equal merit" stanza they seem hellbent on including in any single debate topic? True debaters should know at the heart of things that they might be wrong- not just about the topic they're arguing, but about every single thing they know. The reason they debate is not to make their comment irrefutably true, just to make it more believable or appealing than the alternatives.
And just because Metallica tried a new direction that may have been crap compared to their earlier work does NOT mean that they deserve the schtick for having everyone in the industry copy THEM. They did not drop posters from the sky saying "COPY ME". They are responsible for the work, good or bad, that they did alone.
If you want to blame anyone, blame the music industry for their poor taste in what to trump up, and blame the artists for phoning in imagination for trying to jump on a bandwagon for money or fame or sales or whatever, but Metallica does not deserve that blame. Metallica could have died right then and there with the Black Album, if people had truly disliked what they were doing enough to create their own styles.