I may never get around to playing Skyrim. Is this something I should feel bad about?

Recommended Videos

wings012

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 7, 2011
856
307
68
Country
Malaysia
Dalisclock said:
PFCboom said:
And while every so often I think "I would like to see what the fuss is about", there's the problem that it's a 20 year old game at this point and I suspect I probably wouldn't find it nearly as awesome as it's made out to be because I didn't play it around the time it came out.
When I finally got around to playing FFVII a good decade+ after it was released, I found the experience highly mediocre and only got to the end of the first disc before aborting.

It was the first JRPG experience for many players and may have popularized the whole concept of a cinematic story telling game to many people. But it hasn't aged well, looks like complete arse and more interesting things have been done with turn based combat since.


It's fine to respect how certain titles might have changed the gaming landscape, but times have changed since and it's not necessarily going to be a good experience.
 

CaitSeith

Formely Gone Gonzo
Legacy
Jun 30, 2014
5,374
381
88
Dalisclock said:
What can be said? Skyrim is a great time-sink, but you'll never know for sure if you don't spend any with it. Still I understand; I'm in the same place with the Witcher series.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
17,491
10,275
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
If you're someone that just likes to dip in and out of a game casually and not feel lost because of some half-forgotten questline, then Skyrim is just going to annoy and frustrate you. I happen to like the game myself (981 hours played, so Steam tells me) but I'm not compelled to tell everyone else "you MUST play this game and LIKE it" just to assuage my own ego.

It's kind of unfair to call Skyrim an RPG; it's more like an open-world, fantasy-themed exploration game that wriggled into its sister's RPG pants but they don't really fit and now they're all stretched out and... I'm getting lost in the metaphor here. Sure, there's stats and levels and whatnot, but not much of what you do in one part of the game is going to seriously impact another; you could be the Thane of Whiterun, the Archmage of Winterhold and the leader of the Companions, and that asshole guard at Riften's north gate is still going to try to shake you down for some gold the first time you show up. It's also long in places where it should be short and short in places where it should be long.

But really, if you like wandering around and discovering surprises and interesting tucked-away bits, Skyrim is chock full of that. And the great thing is that you can install all manner of mods for even more interesting stuff.

 

RobertEHouse

Former Mad Man
Mar 29, 2012
152
0
0
How dare you not touch the holy grail which is Skyrim. Be the unbeliever which has yet to gaze their eyes upon the glory which is Bethesda's Skyrim. To witness firsthand the Dovahkiin's voice shout sweet nothings which tear mortal man and dragons in twain. You shall be cursed from this day forth , to have nothing to say at the water cooler at work...

I get you though it is a long game, but it does work out if you play in spurts. The main story line is really not that long if you go from point to point. It's just the exploration and the random side quest you stumble upon which pad out the game nicely. Bethesda did improve from the previous games in the series. Other than that, don't feel bad not finishing or playing Skyrim it's a good game but it should not be something you feel guilty about not playing.