I think this is why we need the Ouya...

Recommended Videos

Bvenged

New member
Sep 4, 2009
1,203
0
0
Westaway said:
Witty Name Here said:
Thing is, I have nothing to go on. Most sites just list "The top 10 best graphics cards for gaming", I'm not interested in "The best of the best" because that usually costs more than a console itself. I have no clue what components work with what, no idea what graphics cards are "good" and which are "okay". If I was given a bunch of funds and told to build a gaming PC, I would probably only create some frankenstein-ish amalgamation of different parts that just don't work together.

snip snip
Actually, it's pretty simple. I'm 16 and I'm about to start building my own computer for the first time.
From that wall of text you seem to be making problems for yourself. When I started this, I had no knowledge on hardware to speak of. All I did was make a thread on the Escapist, which was a huge hit, and then a few other places such as /v/ and /g/. By talking to these people, and hearing their recommendations, you'll learn different things. No one says you have to understand it all straight away.
Also, you have to take into account that for consols you need a TV and games cost more, while computers can be used for thousands of different things. Games on PC cost generally less, and then you have things such as Steam Sales. Delicious.
Witty Name Here has a point, dude. There are not that many easily accessible places to go when it comes to jargon-busting hardware talk. I'm incredibly computer competent and I get confused with the crap in the title of a motherboard.

It's just piss-easy to buy a console for less effort, time and money; hook it all up, connect with friends, purchase the odd game and get playing in widescreen HD using your living room TV.

As for asking the internet, sure - but I know for a fact I would not trust myself if the only form of communication was internet forums when it comes to what I should put into a computer. It is a long term investment and a lot of money to 1st or 3rd party custom build these days, and pre-builds are too overpriced.

Consoles are just the simple way around the technological, economic and social molehills for many, many people. It's preference and opinion on whether they're missing out though; making "PC vs Consoles" an invalid arguement.
 

Westaway

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,084
0
0
Bvenged said:
Westaway said:
Witty Name Here said:
Thing is, I have nothing to go on. Most sites just list "The top 10 best graphics cards for gaming", I'm not interested in "The best of the best" because that usually costs more than a console itself. I have no clue what components work with what, no idea what graphics cards are "good" and which are "okay". If I was given a bunch of funds and told to build a gaming PC, I would probably only create some frankenstein-ish amalgamation of different parts that just don't work together.

snip snip
Actually, it's pretty simple. I'm 16 and I'm about to start building my own computer for the first time.
From that wall of text you seem to be making problems for yourself. When I started this, I had no knowledge on hardware to speak of. All I did was make a thread on the Escapist, which was a huge hit, and then a few other places such as /v/ and /g/. By talking to these people, and hearing their recommendations, you'll learn different things. No one says you have to understand it all straight away.
Also, you have to take into account that for consols you need a TV and games cost more, while computers can be used for thousands of different things. Games on PC cost generally less, and then you have things such as Steam Sales. Delicious.
Witty Name Here has a point, dude. There are not that many easily accessible places to go when it comes to jargon-busting hardware talk. I'm incredibly computer competent and I get confused with the crap in the title of a motherboard.

It's just piss-easy to buy a console for less effort, time and money; hook it all up, connect with friends, purchase the odd game and get playing in widescreen HD using your living room TV.

As for asking the internet, sure - but I know for a fact I would not trust myself if the only form of communication was internet forums when it comes to what I should put into a computer. It is a long term investment and a lot of money to 1st or 3rd party custom build these days, and pre-builds are too overpriced.

Consoles are just the simple way around the technological, economic and social molehills for many, many people. It's preference and opinion on whether they're missing out though; making "PC vs Consoles" an invalid arguement.
Fair enough, but I never said it was easier than just buying a console. I was just pointing out that it's not some insurmountable feat for a computer noob so assemble their own computer. I guess at the end of the day is all falls upon how hardcore you are. If you're going to spend hundreds of hours gaming, it wouldn't hurt to put in a couple building a computer. If we're talking one or two hours of CoD a week, you're obviously only going to need an Xbox or PS3.
 

sanquin

New member
Jun 8, 2011
1,837
0
0
alphamalet said:
I fail to see how I am considered a "lazy ass" for not wanting to deal with the finer details of a gaming PC. I get that some people love tinkering with the tech, and take pride in the customized rig that they build. I don't take pride in that sort of thing. I don't want to dedicate countless hours into researching what parts to buy, how to build it, etc. I want to go to buy a game, put it in the machine, and have it work. I don't want to have to worry about compatibility, having to find potential fixes for games, or tinkering with shaders, dynamic shadows, or other finer graphical details. That makes me a "lazy ass"?
Did you just conveniently skip over the parts where I addressed those things? You don't need to be a pc hobbyist to put together a good gaming pc. All you need is at most 2 hours of a bit of research, if that. Or you can ask a friend or someone you know that does know what they're talking about. There is no 'countless hours'.

There is also no real tinkering with shaders, dynamic shadows, AA and that kind of thing. 95% of the games come with presets of 'low', 'medium', 'high' and 'very high'. Takes 10 seconds at most.

And as I also already said, having to work 10 minutes to 'fix' a game (though I've yet to meet a game that was really broken and that I couldn't play right after installing at launch.) to in return get benefits like better graphics, mods, better fan and dev support, and all that...

If you don't want to do that to have an overall better experience, and if you indeed just want to pop a disk in and play right away - then yes, you are a lazy ass.
 

ChildishLegacy

New member
Apr 16, 2010
974
0
0
As a PC gamer I'm getting so frustrated reading this thread, not because I'm pissed off that people don't like my platform, it's just it's showing me that misconceptions are scaring people away from playing on a platform that for all they know they could like. Might make a thread on it some time later but they always end up turning into raging console vs pc wars, and I just can't be bothered with it.

Bottom line, you're missing out(or at least could be), not the people that are trying to correct you on your misconceptions.
 

Sacman

Don't Bend! Ascend!
May 15, 2008
22,661
0
0
MisterShine said:
dreadedcandiru99 said:
I bet a console that anybody can afford to develop for [http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ouya/ouya-a-new-kind-of-video-game-console] would come in handy right about now.
PC's are just that thing.

Not that I'm opposed to Ouya, mind you. I just haven't yet seen the reason we really need it yet, or what benefits to the market it really provides, so I'm not ready to hop on the hype train.

edit: After reading the Kickstarter page again, I shall upgrade my stance from Expectant Neutrality to Cautious Optimism.
Yeah... I mean, indie games are more accessible than ever on the PC... sure you don't get all of them for free, legally anyway... but they're dirt cheap to develop for and already have a thriving community...

There's just nothing that the Ouya does that doesn't exist on the PC...
 

Bocaj2000

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,082
0
0
I've been waiting for a universal console for a while. From an aspiring developer's point of view, this is an amazing thing that I am anticipating. Also, consoles need more competition to be honest, and I'm glad that it's coming from people with game related backgrounds (as opposed to sony and microsoft).

As for this embarrassing PC vs Console war that's happening... this is not what the thread is about. It's about another contender to rival the "big three" consoles. I have more than 60 games on Steam, but I can still see that console gaming has it's place.

EDIT: This reminds me of my friend from the IT was talking to me about. A very accessible universal system that plays roms of every system since the 80s and be mod-ed to the owner's consent. It is indie developer friendly and AAA friendly and eliminates the idea of console exclusive games.

Yes, one can argue that Windows is the peak of gaming, but that's not the point. You can also argue that there is no point of going to a movie theater when I can play the movie at home or on my laptop. Console gaming is about the experience in many cases. It doesn't feel right playing Street Fighter with a keyboard. On the other hand, it also doesn't feel right playing Counter Strike on the Xbox. Everything has it's place.
 

Odbarc

Elite Member
Jun 30, 2010
1,155
0
41
Can't they just 'make' cheaper games like they used to? You know, when games were good and didn't cost 50 million dollars to create?
 

Bocaj2000

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,082
0
0
Odbarc said:
Can't they just 'make' cheaper games like they used to? You know, when games were good and didn't cost 50 million dollars to create?
It's not a rule that the developer needs to spend that much. The only issue is that cheaper games are called "indie" and are assumed to be a different category.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
Witty Name Here said:
ScrabbitRabbit said:
I became a PC gamer partly because it was cheaper just to get a computer that could game than it was to get a computer AND a console. This was pre-built, too, I was too naive to believe that building one is relatively easy and can save you a fairly substantial amount of money. And you don't have to upgrade anywhere near that much, games haven't gotten all that much more demanding in several years. My PC is relatively recent but several people I know are still using machines from five years ago.

Just because new components are released frequently doesn't mean we need to buy them all.
...No offense, but I don't really think "Cheap" or "Easy" should be used in the same sentence as "Build your own gaming computer".

Hell, if I were to "build my own computer", just looking at the recommended requirements for Battlefield 3 (not minimum, recommended) if I were to build the computer that it recommends I would have to fork over about

Quad Core Intel 2 - $139 on Amazon.com (Then again, just saying "Quad Core Intel" is so vague that I'm not even sure if that's the right one most of them have seemingly unimportant random numbers or letters after them. How am I supposed to know what "LGA 1155" even means?)

RAM - (How am I supposed to know what 4 GB of RAM even costs?)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 - $130 on Amazon (though I have no clue whether this graphics card can play other games or whether it's even superior to the other graphics cards it mentions... Or whether it even has a single GB of RAM on it)

Direct X Sound Card - $50 on Amazon (Once more, I have no way of knowing whether this would work with the other stuff or if it's even good beyond the User Reviews)

So far it's in the $310 dollar range, and that's not counting the monitor, the modem, the keyboard and mouse or... Well, anything else I would inevitably need to build the thing.
Continuing with the Car motif someone mentioned: I know dick all about cars, you put petrol in them and they go, and occasionally put oil and water in them so you don't fuck up the engine. Know what I did when I was buying my first car? I asked some people, I researched stuff on the internet, and I had someone who knew what they were talking about help me when I went to look for cars.

Okay so that's what, £200? £350 if you throw in the Monitor, PSU and Hard drive that you left out. Granted it's not as easy as going out and just buying a console, but that PC would last you for AAAAGES. You do not need to upgrade every two years, you will have seen this after spending any amount of time on the internet, it annoys the hell out of me that people STILL seem to think it costs thousands of pounds and yearly upgrades for a gaming PC to function.

Battlefield 3 is one of the most resource hungry games out there, if you can run that, you can run anything else you want, and it would likely last you well into the next console generation,(Especially if you're building a PC based around BF3, it'll be more powerful than the PS4 and Xbox 720, I'll tell you that for a start) the Xbox 360 and PS3 are still the same consoles they were when they came out,(The xbox 360 came out in 2005 by the way, and the hardware in it was pretty pants then) and they run modern games okay, (granted BF3 was toned down for the consoles, but then the hardware in consoles is pretty pants). Graphics have reached a grinding halt at the moment, I haven't looked at a game and gone "WOW! Look at the graphics!" in years, (not GRAPHICS and not Aesthetics), even that tech demo Square released recently wasn't a massive jump from say... anything this generation. That and it was pre rendered, so it doesn't make anything.

Just because you're too lazy to do any research that would take about 5 minutes on this amazing site called Google (don't tell anyone, it's our secret, kay?) that doesn't make it some impossible task. You ALREADY have a Modem/Router, because we're having this conversation. On the INTERNET. So that's out of the way. You want a mouse and keyboard? Go to Tesco and pick up both for a tenner. You don't need a flashy mouse and keyboard, so long as they work.

RAM: How do you find out how much 4gb of ram costs you ask? Well you look for ram and add the price up. Easy. Why on earth is that so difficult?

GcardThe NVidia GTX 560 has 1GB of VRAM on it. Know how I know that? I googled the name of the card, and it was on the first page.

Sound card? Don't need one of those, never have, and neither will you unless you're an audiophile or record music.

CPU Buy a CPU and motherboard combo, there done. You know the CPU'll fit the motherboard and you're done.

You want a case? That's going to be 10-20 quid unless you feel it necessary to buy a case with flashy lites and gizmos.

Okay, your grandma isn't going to do be able to do it, but I'm going to assume you're at least a little computer literate, or you wouldn't even be on this site, just use your brain and google stuff that you don't understand, I myself figured out how to build a PC when I was 15, it's not exactly brain surgery. In the event that you're not sure, write down the specs and post em to a site to run it by people who've done it before. Or if you're really lazy, just copy the specs for a pre built PC and buy the components yourself.

SO there we go. PC for $530, $600 tops, that'll last you for fucking ages because you decided to base it around Battlefield 3. PS3s seem to run for about $300 from what I can tell, while the games are at least $70 a pop (or at least on a straight conversion, console games are £45 in the UK). PC games in comparison are $45. So you make up for your extra spending by not only having cheaper games, meaning it eventually pays for itself, (that's ignoring Steam sales, where I just got Saints Row 3 for £7, which still retails at £40 in the stores) but also a device that can do lots of other stuff besides play games. Done.

It would take me longer to recite that, than it would for you to do the research it requires to make your own PC. Building it is pretty easy to, if it doesn't look like it fits, it wont. They're all colour/size coded these days too, so if you put something where it isn't supposed to go, it's your own stupid fault.

EDIT: After reading what developed in this thread in the time it took me to type that out, it turns out that 530-600 figure I pulled out of the air was actually bang on the money. Go me!

On the actual OP: Yeah, it's nice to see the kickstarter people are excited about it, but I don't think that it'll actually cause a dent in anyones sales. All it would take is for MS and Sony to start letting people stick up indy games and BAM! No more Ouji-wotsit. No one wants or needs a "console" that only plays phone games, they have a phone for that. Granted the existance of the OUYA could be the kick in the pants MS and Sony need to start supporting indie developers, which would be great, but it would come at the cost of the OUYA launching into a bed of flames and sacrificing itself for the greater good.
 

rupang886

New member
Sep 29, 2009
41
0
0
I'm thinking even though there is these low prices, the current kickstarter budget which I assume to be their only budget, would not generate enough consoles at launch.

According to Kicktraq (http://www.kicktraq.com/projects/ouya/ouya-a-new-kind-of-video-game-console/), the expected forecast of the final pledges is now droping from yesterday's $25 million to $21 million. For the sake of argument, we assume the production cost of the OUYA to be $80 (excluding an additional controller) and the final budget to be $20 million (although they have not finalise the design of the controler, see Penny Arcade article).

So $20 million divide by 80 equals to .... half a million.

We will get less than half a million consoles by launch

Edit: Grammar fix
 

mirasiel

New member
Jul 12, 2010
322
0
0
Witty Name Here said:
MisterShine said:
PC's are just that thing.
Erm... Aren't PCs incredibly expensive? Why should I pay for, essentially, an Xbox AND a PS3 just for one computer that I'll have to update every... Two years or so.
I got my current rig for about 600 quid about 5 or 6 years ago and the only upgrade i've done is bumping myself up to 4 gb of ram, which I can't use properly because I'm still using XP.

Tbh i've not really ran into a game thats made me consider an upgrade until recently and that was Shogun 2, which is kind of infamous for being super resource hungry if it wants.

Hells I picked up Spacemarine in a steam sale 2 weeks ago, prepared myself for dissapointment of low frame rates and it runs like shit off a shiny new shovel.


/edit compare the cost of a new xbox (200 quid-ish) + an HD tv (for it be worth actually playing) 350-400 quid...oh look its about the same price as a PC and then you have your monthly subs/quarterly/yearly subs for online gaming on top of your broadband/line rental.
 

Ryotknife

New member
Oct 15, 2011
1,687
0
0
you could probably get away with not having to upgrade your computer hardware every 4-5 years. by year 3 you might have to tone down the graphic quality from ultra high to just high.

gaming technology is not upgrading as fast as it used to be.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
mirasiel said:
Witty Name Here said:
MisterShine said:
PC's are just that thing.
Erm... Aren't PCs incredibly expensive? Why should I pay for, essentially, an Xbox AND a PS3 just for one computer that I'll have to update every... Two years or so.
I got my current rig for about 600 quid about 5 or 6 years ago and the only upgrade i've done is bumping myself up to 4 gb of ram, which I can't use properly because I'm still using XP.

Tbh i've not really ran into a game thats made me consider an upgrade until recently and that was Shogun 2, which is kind of infamous for being super resource hungry if it wants.

Hells I picked up Spacemarine in a steam sale 2 weeks ago, prepared myself for dissapointment of low frame rates and it runs like shit off a shiny new shovel.


/edit compare the cost of a new xbox (200 quid-ish) + an HD tv (for it be worth actually playing) 350-400 quid...oh look its about the same price as a PC and then you have your monthly subs/quarterly/yearly subs for online gaming on top of your broadband/line rental.
Had the same results myself with Saints Row 3, THQ seem to be amazingly good at optimizing games for the PC, as a THQ game will always run better than a comparable game published by another company. Total War Games on the other hand are steaming piles of shite when it comes to optimization, my mate can run Battlefield 3 and Skyrim on Max settings, most Total War games?Fuck right off.
 

WinstonJEC

I play minecraft... alot
Sep 8, 2010
63
0
0
Kytseo said:
WinstonJEC said:
I agree, but my only complaint is will this console get some pretty big title games? Or will I be playing some mediocre indie games developed originally for phones. I won't buy one on launch unless I see what will be ready for download on release day. I'm excited but skeptical.
Is Minecraft big enough?, because apparently there's going to be an Ouya port.
I mean yeah Minecraft will definitely be awesome, but it's not something that will make me buy the system. I want to see some good games being released on it at launch. But we have till march so I'm still excited to see whats in store for us.
 

9thRequiem

New member
Sep 21, 2010
447
0
0
Kytseo said:
WinstonJEC said:
I agree, but my only complaint is will this console get some pretty big title games? Or will I be playing some mediocre indie games developed originally for phones. I won't buy one on launch unless I see what will be ready for download on release day. I'm excited but skeptical.
Is Minecraft big enough?, because apparently there's going to be an Ouya port.
Not for sure, and certainly not on release.
There MIGHT be a Minecraft port provided that the hardware is good enough and also that there is enough of a user base. In other words, the Ouya has to be released, and be successful before Minecraft will be available on it.
I think that may be Ouya's downfall - with regular consoles, there's sufficient funds to both get developers early versions on the promise of launch titles, but also weather out any lackluster sales period until enough good games provide incentive for people to buy. It's possible that this may crash and burn before it's got off the ground ...

I'm not sure if I'd really use this for gaming much, although there's undoubtedly going to be a lot of emulators for old systems that would be fun, but it might be good for video streaming from PC to TV.

On gaming PCs; quit hassling him. Not everyone can spend the time it takes to fully research and plan things out. Some people want to just insert disk, make game happen. And there's nothing wrong with that. Like consoles, Ouya can appeal to people who'd otherwise not be involved at all.
 

mirasiel

New member
Jul 12, 2010
322
0
0
elvor0 said:
mirasiel said:
Witty Name Here said:
MisterShine said:
PC's are just that thing.
Erm... Aren't PCs incredibly expensive? Why should I pay for, essentially, an Xbox AND a PS3 just for one computer that I'll have to update every... Two years or so.
I got my current rig for about 600 quid about 5 or 6 years ago and the only upgrade i've done is bumping myself up to 4 gb of ram, which I can't use properly because I'm still using XP.

Tbh i've not really ran into a game thats made me consider an upgrade until recently and that was Shogun 2, which is kind of infamous for being super resource hungry if it wants.

Hells I picked up Spacemarine in a steam sale 2 weeks ago, prepared myself for dissapointment of low frame rates and it runs like shit off a shiny new shovel.


/edit compare the cost of a new xbox (200 quid-ish) + an HD tv (for it be worth actually playing) 350-400 quid...oh look its about the same price as a PC and then you have your monthly subs/quarterly/yearly subs for online gaming on top of your broadband/line rental.
Had the same results myself with Saints Row 3, THQ seem to be amazingly good at optimizing games for the PC, as a THQ game will always run better than a comparable game published by another company. Total War Games on the other hand are steaming piles of shite when it comes to optimization, my mate can run Battlefield 3 and Skyrim on Max settings, most Total War games?Fuck right off.
I always though the problem with the TW games was that they displayed such huge armies with all their individual troops that it didn't matter how well opt. it was it would still run poorly if you didn't hook it up to a god pc.

Like Crysis but for smart people /ducks.
 

Pink Gregory

New member
Jul 30, 2008
2,296
0
0
Must we have this console/PC argument AGAIN?

PC is better, many people (such as myself) know this, but still prefer console.

Does it matter?

On topic, I'm all for it, although I don't want to see retail wither and die just yet.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
mirasiel said:
elvor0 said:
mirasiel said:
Witty Name Here said:
MisterShine said:
PC's are just that thing.
Erm... Aren't PCs incredibly expensive? Why should I pay for, essentially, an Xbox AND a PS3 just for one computer that I'll have to update every... Two years or so.
I got my current rig for about 600 quid about 5 or 6 years ago and the only upgrade i've done is bumping myself up to 4 gb of ram, which I can't use properly because I'm still using XP.

Tbh i've not really ran into a game thats made me consider an upgrade until recently and that was Shogun 2, which is kind of infamous for being super resource hungry if it wants.

Hells I picked up Spacemarine in a steam sale 2 weeks ago, prepared myself for dissapointment of low frame rates and it runs like shit off a shiny new shovel.


/edit compare the cost of a new xbox (200 quid-ish) + an HD tv (for it be worth actually playing) 350-400 quid...oh look its about the same price as a PC and then you have your monthly subs/quarterly/yearly subs for online gaming on top of your broadband/line rental.
Had the same results myself with Saints Row 3, THQ seem to be amazingly good at optimizing games for the PC, as a THQ game will always run better than a comparable game published by another company. Total War Games on the other hand are steaming piles of shite when it comes to optimization, my mate can run Battlefield 3 and Skyrim on Max settings, most Total War games?Fuck right off.
I always though the problem with the TW games was that they displayed such huge armies with all their individual troops that it didn't matter how well opt. it was it would still run poorly if you didn't hook it up to a god pc.

Like Crysis but for smart people /ducks.
That does make sense, while Crysis has better graphics, Total War has to process so many individual things that it's just a really hard game to run, still a pain in the arse though, I'm sure whoever makes it could optimize at least a little better.
 

Bvenged

New member
Sep 4, 2009
1,203
0
0
Westaway said:
Bvenged said:
Westaway said:
snip snip snip
Witty Name Here [www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/9.382058.15072640] has a point, dude. There are not that many easily accessible places to go when it comes to jargon-busting hardware talk. I'm incredibly computer competent and I get confused with the crap in the title of a motherboard.

It's just piss-easy to buy a console for less effort, time and money; hook it all up, connect with friends, purchase the odd game and get playing in widescreen HD using your living room TV.

As for asking the internet, sure - but I know for a fact I would not trust myself if the only form of communication was internet forums when it comes to what I should put into a computer. It is a long term investment and a lot of money to 1st or 3rd party custom build these days, and pre-builds are too overpriced.

Consoles are just the simple way around the technological, economic and social molehills for many, many people. It's preference and opinion on whether they're missing out though; making "PC vs Consoles" an invalid arguement.
Fair enough, but I never said it was easier than just buying a console. I was just pointing out that it's not some insurmountable feat for a computer noob so assemble their own computer. I guess at the end of the day is all falls upon how hardcore you are. If you're going to spend hundreds of hours gaming, it wouldn't hurt to put in a couple building a computer. If we're talking one or two hours of CoD a week, you're obviously only going to need an Xbox or PS3.
No, not necessarily - you've missed my point again. Console gaming has nothing to do with "how hardcore" you are. Try telling MLG that the less hardcore play PC and only casuals play console.

You can spend hundreds of hours a day playing Halo, GTA and Gran Terismo on your console, just as much as the chap spending an equal amount of time on Steam playing HL2 and CIV 5. The kind of gamer you are and how much you play is not a factor.

Console gaming exists because it's all about ease of use. The hardest decision to make with console gaming is "What console do I buy?"; then you head for home where you plug it in and play all your favourite games with all your friends. Simple as that.
PC's were and still are for those who enjoyed tweaking and fiddling with their games and systems to get the most out of them. though now it's a little broader as those who just want the best graphics or play a certain genre have jumped on the bandwagon too.[footnote] In fact, a sub-factor relating to games is if someone wants to play specific games made primarily for one platform or another. Halo 1 & 2 plays quite poorly on PC whilst UT3 felt out-of-place and too slow on console.[/footnote]

"If you're going to spend hundreds of hours gaming, it wouldn't hurt to put in a couple building a computer." - and spontaneously pull time, money and knowledge out of their arses to sort out a computer to game on? It's not an easy purchase, but a long-term investment that can go wrong. Some people can't afford a new mid-high end PC so readily, some haven't the time, some don't know the in's and out's of computer and would rather just avoid it and some just want a system that could become an expensive, oversized paperweight if they bugger the wrong directory.

So it has nothing to do with how much you game, it's preference at the end of the day. If you enjoy learning about computers and want to play around with your gaming and not just in it, or like to brag about having 2x 8GB DDR3 Duel-layer 2133MHz RAM in your custom-build to play BF3 at 90fps despite not knowing what that actually means; PC gaming is for you. If you just want a system that plays the latest games, with your friends, with ease of use in your living room; consoles are for you.

If you enjoy playing god games and strategies, modding and older games like SWAT 4 or WoW; followed up by hopping on your Xbox to play some competitive matches of Halo with friends; go with both, like me :D
 

Westaway

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,084
0
0
Bvenged said:
Omega snip
Now, I'll tell you why I disagree, but let me get a couple things out of the way.
1) I never said consolers were casuals
2) You ignored my arguments regarding building a computer and it's difficulty.
The reason I feel like continuing this argument even though clearly neither of us will change our opinions is that I, -I-. Me. My opinion. Is that gaming on a computer is BETTER than on consoles in MANY different ways. I find it MUCH, MUCH more fun playing on PC than xbox. That is why I feel like PCs are better in the long run than consoles. Reading your post, I realized that it was extremely stupid to think that was the case for everyone else.
You keep making it seem like building a PC is really really hard, which is confusing me considering you have lots of experience with the things. I have plenty (well, five) friends, in high school, who have built their own computers without MUCH help from other people. That obviously is another reason why I see PC as the superior machine, because they don't frankly seem to be THAT much of a hassle. Especially after you've built one or two. As for money, I'm in no position to say anything. I'm 16, and rich, so my parents are splitting the whole thing 50/50. I'm paying $500, which I made from my job, and my parents are paying $500, which is a lot of fucking money, but my system will be at the top of the line, and the price will drop when I degrade a couple things, get deals and all that jazz. I'm hoping for it to end up at $850 including shipping and tax. But now I'm off topic.
Now, please don't take what I'm about to say the wrong way, but I think it would be best for everyone if we just end this conversation. I'm not saying that so you can't denounce any of my arguments; if something I say is wrong, PLEASE call me out on it. But I feel like since we're both pretty much positive we're right that we won't get anywhere.
Peace.