You said "I don't see a difference" (which screams equation to me) right off the bat, so I kind of resent the notion that I'm operating under a delusion when you created the premise.Netrigan said:Well, you seem to be under the delusion that I'm trying to equate all these things.
I'm sure the brain chemistry is even very similar. But the value of the complaints is not automatically the same - not in terms of their value to the environment and the actors within. I think a well-reasoned complaint deserves a groundswell of support and serious consideration from those in power. I think a bullshit or inaccurate complaint deserves a critical response but not serious consideration, and the volume of the complainer really shouldn't factor into the proceedings at all.You may call it reductive, but the underlying principle is pretty much the same in either case. You see something you don't like, you air your criticism, the point of the criticism is to get someone in a position of power to respond to your complaint. From the smallest most asinine complaint to the most important thing ever, complaining is a way of attempting to fix a perceived problem.
Again, I think there's a chasm of difference between criticism based on mechanical design and functionality and criticism based on more subjective and thematic content. Also, if you research a razor and find claims that it won't shave your face very well, do you buy it anyways and complain? Or do you seek out other razors? And if literally no one makes the sort of razor you need, do you sourly criticize all the razors admirably servicing the majority of the market place? Or do you see about finding someone who will make you and people like you the razors you desire?In every case, it's possible for someone to work their way up through the system and change it from within. In fact, many a career has been started by people who said, "fuck this, I could make a better electric razor than this." But whenever someone tells someone else to do that, they're telling them to shut up.
In a nutshell: if people perceive a gap in the market, it doesn't fall on existing producers to fill that gap. Yelling at them to do so is lazy, selfish, and frequently counterproductive. Support the stuff you like, ignore the stuff you don't. The way some people talk, I'm convinced they won't be happy (and won't stop crusading) until literally every game somehow revolves around (or pays homage to) their worldview. That's not how a free market place of ideas is supposed to work. There will *always* be games and other media that portray things some people won't like or enjoy, and trying to shame or criticize them out of existence isn't progressive. It's fascist.