I was considering Infinite Warfare until I saw these posted on their Facebook page

[Vigormortis]

It's a Shotgun, which I suspect means it an always OHK at close range and pushes the effective kill range out a notable amount.

Egh, I don't know. I can't say.

And to be completely honest, I don't really care. I get why this whole thing would be bothersome but it bares no consequence to me. My only interest in Infinite Warfare is the campaign (and perhaps the COD4 remaster). Beyond that the game offers nothing for me.[footnote]Well...maybe some of the PvE multiplayer stuff could be fun. The new Zombies mode looks pretty great.[/footnote]

My multiplayer shooter fix is coming in the form of Titanfall 2.

 

[votemarvel]

People are still interested in call of duty?

Why would they not be?

They are well made competent shooters, they look good, have decent (if far too short) single player campaigns, and generally people consider its multiplayer to be really quite fun.

 

[Fallow]

Also, all health regenerates, so in skilled hands it'd be a none-stop rape train.

Would there be brakes on this hypothetical train?

 

[09philj]

Also, all health regenerates, so in skilled hands it'd be a none-stop rape train.

Would there be brakes on this hypothetical train?

That depends how good your team's snipers are.

 

[Remus]

HEY! Who put their Destiny in my Call of Duty?

 

[Adam Jensen_v1legacy]

Good lord those are some ugly weapon models. The fire mods sound bad. How long until someone at Activision realizes that in a shooter like CoD less is more?

 

[Dalisclock]

Good lord those are some ugly weapon models. The fire mods sound bad. How long until someone at Activision realizes that in a shooter like CoD less is more?

You sure we're talking about CoD here? Because they've been on the "Bigger! Faster! More Explosions!" Train for quite a few years now.

Maybe the first few were "low key" but since MW onwards the whole thing has been over the top.

 

[Gethsemani_v1legacy]

An assault rifle called R3KT, really? I think the juvenile humor of the developers is what we should be focusing on and not the money grubbing ways of Activision (because these will totally be available in loot boxes, amirite?).

 

[bastardofmelbourne]

An assault rifle called R3KT, really? I think the juvenile humor of the developers is what we should be focusing on and not the money grubbing ways of Activision (because these will totally be available in loot boxes, amirite?).

To be fair, the game is set twenty minutes into the future. The in-universe designers of the weapon were probably once 13-year-olds playing whatever video game the Call of Duty world has instead of Call of Duty. Now they're all grown up, working for the military, and sneaking some juvenile humour into the names of their inventions as their own little joke.

 

[Paragon Fury]

Good lord those are some ugly weapon models. The fire mods sound bad. How long until someone at Activision realizes that in a shooter like CoD less is more?

You sure we're talking about CoD here? Because they've been on the "Bigger! Faster! More Explosions!" Train for quite a few years now.

Maybe the first few were "low key" but since MW onwards the whole thing has been over the top.

Hey, the first MW was fairly grounded. Granted, it was still very much "Hollywood Grounded" in that it pumped up some of the action and the mechanics were obviously made to be fun, but it still took war as a serious and grim matter, didn't have a completely off-the-rails story and was obviously still trying to be a military shooter at it's core.

MW2 and on though? Yeah, totally batshit.