If OnLive works as promised, do you really think it could replace the home console?

Recommended Videos

zer0imagination

New member
Apr 3, 2009
3
0
0
I don't think it could replace EVERYTHING. A lot of people still prefer hard copies of everything. Like me. I want a physical disc so I don't necessarily have to be online to install and play the game. Like someone else said this is gonna end up being worse then steam with the only plus being that it's on max settings all the time. And 8MBps? Damn my internet only goes @ like 1. Damn guess Canada has been omitted out of this.
 

Ifeno

New member
Apr 3, 2009
76
0
0
no simply because there are some games that wouldnt work on the computer...for exampl the SSB series...you cant bash peaches head in with your mouse no matter how much you click...also...i personaly prefer a controler over a keyboard any day...but thats just me :3
 

Lemony

New member
May 2, 2008
112
0
0
It doesn't support most Wii games (as of right now) due to lack of the Wii Controller. I think that you must understand that you MUST have an internet connection, and seriously? You don't have internet? and you are at this forum and typing?
 

THEMANWHOIS

New member
Mar 12, 2009
513
0
0
garjian said:
...

dont you get the feeling...
it seems to just ooze failure :S

and surely since its streaming games... online play will be really slow... and i dunno... it just feels... crap... i doubt this will work... even if it works properly...
Totally agree. I just can't see how this will work out in the long run, especially for online play. Feels kind of gimmicky imo.
 

Quadtrix

New member
Dec 17, 2008
835
0
0
As I already stated, Perlman said it would cost something around $50 a YEAR, which is more than reasonable. It's practically a steal.
 

Shycte

New member
Mar 10, 2009
2,564
0
0
If I get a better broadband, I will replace it with my internal organs if I can..
 

Baneat

New member
Jul 18, 2008
2,762
0
0
Doug said:
In the UK, boardband speeds are woefully low (8 Mbps is the typical for an area), so I doubt OnLive will really work here for a few years yet. Assuming OnLive actually works. Which is questionnable.
8 megabits is actually way above average, avg is like 2. I get 8 and I'm the only person I know of who actually gets that.
 

Quadtrix

New member
Dec 17, 2008
835
0
0
I'm hoping other devs give OnLive a chance. I'd love to see stuff like Half-Life, Elder Scrolls, etc. on there.
 

Jman1236

New member
Jul 29, 2008
528
0
0
Let me give you 3 answers:

1.No
2.No
3.NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
Notice that it's "steaming" not downloading the games to the box. Yes, I'm mostly likely going to run out and buy one, or at least download the software for my Laptop, to pay Crysis but to think that steaming will work in the real world as it does on paper, you have to be nuts. All it would take to ruin a game is someone in the house or on the same local network to start serveral torrents and your screwed.
 

Da_Schwartz

New member
Jul 15, 2008
1,849
0
0
This will never work anytime in teh near future.. someday probably but i wouldn't hold my breath. This is one of those projects that will be hyped and talked about for months and then just go away.
 

RobotoWorks

New member
Aug 17, 2008
269
0
0
keptsimple said:
Quadtrix said:
Not entirely sure. All I know is the connection speed listed in my connection options states 54 Mbps. I can't download things at that speed, but I do have a rather small hard drive on my laptop, not to mention I'm using a wireless connection with my Netgear wireless router.
http://www.speedtest.net/

I have Roadrunner and I get around 6 to 8 mbps, despite the promise of a "potentially" higher speed.

Your hard drive size shouldn't have much (if any) impact on your download speed. Time Warner's bullshit is the problem. Of course, they're no worse than any other provider.
Okay, this is a bit off subject, but I did a test with that link you provided. It said I get about 1.32 MBPS. I'm running DSL High Speed Internet through Qwest. How in the heck is it that I'm getting such a low speed?
 

karpiel

New member
Apr 18, 2008
141
0
0
Onlive is guaranteed to fail, its business model is completely asinine, it's the potential virtual boy of this generation.
 

ChromeAlchemist

New member
Aug 21, 2008
5,865
0
0
Doug said:
In the UK, boardband speeds are woefully low (8 Mbps is the typical for an area), so I doubt OnLive will really work here for a few years yet. Assuming OnLive actually works. Which is questionnable.
Corr, woefully low? What are you lot like?

*Put's old man hat on* In my day, 2 Meg speeds was godlike, and taking three hours to download a 700mb was a blessing. *takes hat off*

Oh, and whatever speed you may think is fast, it's got nothing on Korea.

Think 50 megs is fast? Try 1GB. How fast could you download a 700mb file?

Either way, I think I'll wait this one out on the OnLive thing, and probably would never be using it.
 

Quadtrix

New member
Dec 17, 2008
835
0
0
You know, when you really think about it, the only people who might consider buying this would be Wii owners or people who don't own any console. If you have a 360 and/or PS3, I cant' imagine why you'd want to use OnLive.
 

Quadtrix

New member
Dec 17, 2008
835
0
0
Due to my wireless network suddenly not working, I had to reconfigure my router. And now, instead of 6.8 Mbps, I'm getting 10.6 Mbps. This is pretty damn cool.
 

Jupsto

New member
Feb 8, 2008
619
0
0
my only problem/question with onlive is: what happens when you stop subscribing?

ie. say you buy 10 games on online and spend £200 or something play for a year then stop subbing. isn't that 10 games you cannot play anymore? if you have bought them normally you could still be playing. so you don't actually own those games like you would via steam or hard copy. its just perminant rental service.

if when you bought games from onlive you got some sort of license and could download backups of the games whenever you want. kind of like how you get a copy of the game on your hardrive in steam only optional. only then would onlive work.

I've got mobile broadband, a usb device I plug in so can use internet anywhere. its really shit don't buy one (unrealiable+downloadlimit+veryhighping). but sometimes i get up to 3mbps bandwidth, the ping is off the roof so it counts for nothing when I'm trying to snipe. but won't be long till the tech gets actually good, not hard to imagine in the future gbps internet you can use anywhere, eventually onlive will be possible even if you live in the middle of nowhere with no phoneline.
 

letsnoobtehpwns

New member
Dec 28, 2008
1,628
0
0
I would never quit console gaming for PC gaming. I always thought as the mouse and keyboard controls for people who are to stupid to use a fucking controller. Damn, I'm going to get a lot of hate for saying that the PC controls suck!
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
I certainly hope the concept doesn't catch on. I've never been a fan of the software as a service approach (notable examples are MMO's and anti-virus software).
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
No. No it will not. It relies too much on something that you have no proper control over.
 

Devildoc

New member
Mar 26, 2009
261
0
0
If it works, it might put sony and MS out of the business unless they evolve, but Nintendo will survive because I doubt Onlive is going to have anything but a standard controller, and Nintendo sure isn't going to let its 1st party franchises be compatable with Onlive.

In fact THE most threatened market if Onlive succeeds is PC gaming hardware manufacturers.