shootthebandit said:
how the world has basically been so pussified, you can pretty much guarantee as soon as they opened their mouth they would be done for political correctness. Try explaining political correctness and health and safety to someone from the 50s
This is a big one[footnote]Incidentally, I don't necessarily agree with the way you worded it, but that is a nice example of how someone from the 50's would probably react to this part of the changes in the world, so it's a good thing to quote.[/footnote]. I can't be the only one whose first thought on hearing about the Paula Dean racism "scandal" was "so she grew up in the 50's and said the N-word 30 years ago? If that's enough to fire her, then it's time to remove an entire generation from the work force. Possibly two." The fact that the civil rights movement has gone so far that we actually have a black president now would have to be absolutely mindblowing. Depending on how early in the 50's we're talking, we're looking at it either not existing at all except in a preparatory state, or there only being a few major victories, like Brown v. Board, which weren't being enforced yet, at any rate.
Another big change is just how much more open society has gotten about scatalogical and sexual subjects. My great aunt, who grew up in the depression, finds the word "poop" to be offensive, even used in a non-offensive context. She's not crazy, people were just that much less crude back then, probably a holdover from the Victorian era. Now the 50's weren't quite that squeaky clean, but they were still a lot more prudish than we are today. It'd be a major source of culture shock. I mean, try explaining how South Park runs on TV, instead of in, like, a seedy porn theater. Then realize that the "slut walk" is a thing, and try explaining that. Internet porn is right out. Speaking of which...
Then there's the internet, which if anyone had a frame of reference for it would be either because they had knowledge about military research that they probably shouldn't have, or because they were avid sci-fi fans and had read some author who had predicted a "global network" of some sort. As someone else put it, pretty much /anything/ having to do with computers is going to be new for a person from that era, since what few computers they had back then were so different from what we have now. It wouldn't surprise me if my bedroom TV has more processing power and memory than the best computer they had back then, and it's a standard def CRT that was made in 2003. Incidentally, a sentence like that last on would be unbelievably confusing for a person transported from the 50's.
As far as geopolitics, they'd probably have an easier time understanding it now than they would have 10 or 15 years ago. Yes, the cold war has been over for long enough that we have an entire generation that is now graduating college with basically no knowledge of it, because the history books have yet to catch up to the reality that the kids entering school have grown up in a post-cold war world, and have been since the 90's, but at least Russia and the US have started posturing again, as opposed to the near total lack of aggression that existed for so long after the fall of the iron curtain. Terrorism being the big fear instead of communism would be really confusing to them, though, as would our friendly relations with still-nominally-communist China[footnote]Which have only existed since the 70's -- Nixon, for all his failings, was surprisingly good at foreign policy. Beat the pants off of every republican and most democrats that came after him. You can argue about the long term effects of trading with China, but you can't argue that the man managed to make an ally out of an enemy.[/footnote].