I thought the first thing i clicked on that XD. I would probably have myself deleted.ThatLankyBastard said:Really? Damn... I thought it went specifically to MY profile...ThePoodonkis said:The link goes directly to one's own profile. Just a clever use of the URL function.ZoMaster101 said:wait why dopes this link keep going to me, do you want to delete me? or does this link just go to whomever clicks on it?katsumoto03 said:
what? de-create the guy that brought the world out of the great depression, when nothing was working, and nobody had any functional plans? skipping the evil, there's quite alot of good that he did that still reflects in the world today, even his evil had results that changed the world for the better, that, probably woulden't have, if not then, but much much later.Jezzascmezza said:Hitler I guess.
He is probably one of the most evil human beings to ever live, so I guess getting rid of him would be a good thing.
Raffi? Why?HT_Black said:BANANNA PHONE
ooh, how dilightfulkatsumoto03 said:
then again, without the russain famine and the trading with the nazis, mr S. would not have made a massive army from all the money made, we would be having american propaganda being shoved down our throats, and possibly in aa nuclear war.toriver said:It would be very interesting to say Hitler, thereby proving Godwin's Law, but I feel that the legacy of World War II is a mixed bag, as horrible as the Holocaust was. Instead, I am going to go with someone involved with WWII who is often overlooked as someone to "erase" in these kinds of questions.
Josef Stalin
When Lenin died, it was quite a close call between Stalin and Trotsky over who would be his successor. The Soviet Union was not a totalitarian regime at the time. Stalin took it in that direction, and it is not inevitable that Trotsky would have done the same. Yes, under Stalin's regime the Soviet Union experienced a great amount of economic growth, but at a tremendous cost that ended up being larger than the amount that died under Nazi rule in Germany. While Stalin's gulags were more for political than ethnic prisoners, it was pretty much for anyone whom he had any sort of slight problem with. Further, it was the Stalinist Soviet Union that really started the whole "Red Scare" in the U.S. that led to the Cold War and the branding of Communism as inevitably leading to such totalitarian regimes. The Cold War itself was really a shameful period in the foreign policies of both the U.S. and Russia/U.S.S.R., that I am sure both would take back in a heartbeat. Under Stalin, the Soviets did win WWII, but then placed the entirety of Eastern Europe under their harsh sphere of influence, dragging the region's growth to a stunted pace as compared to that of Western Europe and North America. Really, anything Stalin touched turned to crud. And I feel the Soviets and the Allies could have still won the war under Trotsky, even if they avoided going totalitarian. History would have looked a lot different. Whether that would be for the better or worse is unknown, but it would be hard to be worse than what Stalin did to the U.S.S.R. So that's who I would "erase" from history.
we would be talking in russianSiuki said:Raffi? Why?HT_Black said:BANANNA PHONE
OT: 'Ol Hitler. I'd really like to see what would happen without him.
Chiang Kai-Shek was no great gift himself.Wolfenbarg said:Chairman Mao. If you have to delete someone from history, why not the largest mass murderer in human history?
That would be assuming the US would try to take over the world in the absence of a counter-balancing superpower. Funny, in the 20 years since the US has become the sole world superpower in its own right, I haven't exactly seen that happening. About the nuclear thing, I think what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was quite the effective deterrent to the US pulling out the nukes again unless some other nation used them first. I don't see your scenario happening.NAHTZEE said:ooh, how dilightfulkatsumoto03 said:
i would delete jack thompson. why does he exist? i dont knowthen again, without the russain famine and the trading with the nazis, mr S. would not have made a massive army from all the money made, we would be having american propaganda being shoved down our throats, and possibly in aa nuclear war.toriver said:It would be very interesting to say Hitler, thereby proving Godwin's Law, but I feel that the legacy of World War II is a mixed bag, as horrible as the Holocaust was. Instead, I am going to go with someone involved with WWII who is often overlooked as someone to "erase" in these kinds of questions.
Josef Stalin
When Lenin died, it was quite a close call between Stalin and Trotsky over who would be his successor. The Soviet Union was not a totalitarian regime at the time. Stalin took it in that direction, and it is not inevitable that Trotsky would have done the same. Yes, under Stalin's regime the Soviet Union experienced a great amount of economic growth, but at a tremendous cost that ended up being larger than the amount that died under Nazi rule in Germany. While Stalin's gulags were more for political than ethnic prisoners, it was pretty much for anyone whom he had any sort of slight problem with. Further, it was the Stalinist Soviet Union that really started the whole "Red Scare" in the U.S. that led to the Cold War and the branding of Communism as inevitably leading to such totalitarian regimes. The Cold War itself was really a shameful period in the foreign policies of both the U.S. and Russia/U.S.S.R., that I am sure both would take back in a heartbeat. Under Stalin, the Soviets did win WWII, but then placed the entirety of Eastern Europe under their harsh sphere of influence, dragging the region's growth to a stunted pace as compared to that of Western Europe and North America. Really, anything Stalin touched turned to crud. And I feel the Soviets and the Allies could have still won the war under Trotsky, even if they avoided going totalitarian. History would have looked a lot different. Whether that would be for the better or worse is unknown, but it would be hard to be worse than what Stalin did to the U.S.S.R. So that's who I would "erase" from history.