I'd fix all the problems with Mirror's Edge and improve the running system to something a bit more intuitive than "PRESS X TO NOT DIE (by falling off this building)" I realize it's not quicktime but I would have liked a little more depth in controls
Hmm, that's not really fixing it, is it? I like the WW2 setting, it's just that it needs a fresh face. That's why I'm looking forward to The Saboteur so much.TaborMallory said:It's called not putting the game in WWII.Fanusc101 said:How would you fix the WW2 part?DrunkWithPower said:CoD:WaW, I'd if the WW2 part because I've been a private in WW2 like 80 times now.
Kudos, Amen, /thumbs upMaxTheReaper said:I would go back and kill anyone who even muttered the word "deadline" when KotOR II was being made.
I forgot about that game, yeah it looks pretty good, here's to hoping they don't fuck up!Fanusc101 said:Hmm, that's not really fixing it, is it? I like the WW2 setting, it's just that it needs a fresh face. That's why I'm looking forward to The Saboteur so much.TaborMallory said:It's called not putting the game in WWII.Fanusc101 said:How would you fix the WW2 part?DrunkWithPower said:CoD:WaW, I'd if the WW2 part because I've been a private in WW2 like 80 times now.
Hmm... very debatable. I personally think there have been more than plenty games in the WWII setting.Fanusc101 said:Hmm, that's not really fixing it, is it? I like the WW2 setting, it's just that it needs a fresh face. That's why I'm looking forward to The Saboteur so much.TaborMallory said:It's called not putting the game in WWII.Fanusc101 said:How would you fix the WW2 part?DrunkWithPower said:CoD:WaW, I'd if the WW2 part because I've been a private in WW2 like 80 times now.
It was done on time. It was just crap on Blizzard standards, so they went with the "Better release good games than crap." mentality. We might have dodged a bullet!Percutio said:I'd fix Starcraft Ghost so that one of the good developers would have actually stayed on board and have gotten the thing done in time.
Hey now thats a bit much, cause that includes me. I would say any one under 12, basically no balls no talk.SebZero said:I'd fix KotoR 2 into the sacred game it should have been.
I'd also fix Halo 3 so that anyone under the age of 16 who picked it up fell into a coma/ imploded.
No balls no talk? You do realize that your plan wouldn't help at all, seeing as males have balls regardless of age.dkuch said:Hey now thats a bit much, cause that includes me. I would say any one under 12, basically no balls no talk.SebZero said:I'd fix KotoR 2 into the sacred game it should have been.
I'd also fix Halo 3 so that anyone under the age of 16 who picked it up fell into a coma/ imploded.
Heh, I know it's a bit too much since it was technically me too (I was 15 when I got it), but still, 12 may be too low.dkuch said:Hey now thats a bit much, cause that includes me. I would say any one under 12, basically no balls no talk.
You didn't get what I was saying. I was talking about balls dropping. You know so we don't listen to chipmunks who scream because they can't aim for shit. Only then can you talk in any game without the penalty of imploding.BolognaBaloney said:No balls no talk? You do realize that your plan wouldn't help at all, seeing as males have balls regardless of age.dkuch said:Hey now thats a bit much, cause that includes me. I would say any one under 12, basically no balls no talk.SebZero said:I'd fix KotoR 2 into the sacred game it should have been.
I'd also fix Halo 3 so that anyone under the age of 16 who picked it up fell into a coma/ imploded.
Personally I say stick with the none under 17, because that's the age group that is supposed to be playing it in the first place.SebZero said:Heh, I know it's a bit too much since it was technically me too (I was 15 when I got it), but still, 12 may be too low.dkuch said:Hey now thats a bit much, cause that includes me. I would say any one under 12, basically no balls no talk.
14. And even then it may be pushing it....
Aw boo. That's just no fun.BolognaBaloney said:Personally I say stick with the none under 17, because that's the age group that is supposed to be playing it in the first place.SebZero said:Heh, I know it's a bit too much since it was technically me too (I was 15 when I got it), but still, 12 may be too low.dkuch said:Hey now thats a bit much, cause that includes me. I would say any one under 12, basically no balls no talk.
14. And even then it may be pushing it....
Well honestly the game is marketed to kids so I would say 10-20 is the demographic for Halo. And really Halo isn't that violent. I don't even see why it is rated M or whatever it is over the ocean. I would say this, any one who bitches every five seconds and doesn't do their job will be subjected to either an epilepsy attack via screen flashing or a self destructing controller that can detect whining and will send plastic shrapnel into the hands!BolognaBaloney said:Personally I say stick with the none under 17, because that's the age group that is supposed to be playing it in the first place.SebZero said:Heh, I know it's a bit too much since it was technically me too (I was 15 when I got it), but still, 12 may be too low.dkuch said:Hey now thats a bit much, cause that includes me. I would say any one under 12, basically no balls no talk.
14. And even then it may be pushing it....
That comes in as a close second. But we have Saints Row and Just Cause franchises,so...BolognaBaloney said:Personally, I would go back and stop GTA 4 from being a boring, depressing, eastern-european life simulator, and turn it back into the crime-riddled, drug-crazed, open world mayhem inducing wonderland that it was supposed to be.