fine. It would be better for the entire world and every single non-human inhabitant. happy now?Sewblon said:Better for who? "Better" is a subjective term; it has no meaning apart from what sentient beings ascribe to it and we don't know as a fact that animals are sentient." Anyway the world would be better without illnesses.DeathNova said:You can't argue that the world wouldn't be a better place without humanity.deewank said:that was kind of dark man. I mean without stupid people our workforce would be goneKhell_Sennet said:Stupid people, or if not possible, humanity as a whole.
I was going to say humans anyway
No, like I said we don't know that any of those things are sentient.DeathNova said:fine. It would be better for the entire world and every single non-human inhabitant. happy now?Sewblon said:Better for who? "Better" is a subjective term; it has no meaning apart from what sentient beings ascribe to it and we don't know as a fact that animals are sentient." Anyway the world would be better without illnesses.DeathNova said:You can't argue that the world wouldn't be a better place without humanity.deewank said:that was kind of dark man. I mean without stupid people our workforce would be goneKhell_Sennet said:Stupid people, or if not possible, humanity as a whole.
I was going to say humans anyway