If you could only have one --> Gears of War 3 or Halo Reach
- Thread starter UnwishedGunz
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Ehhhh...... I feel like it's a tie, but Reach has character customization.
So Reach wins by a little.
Sorry Gears, I still love you!
So Reach wins by a little.
Sorry Gears, I still love you!
It's a hard choice but Reach has character coustomization, along with forge and coustom games. Coustom games are awesome and add a lot more of replay ability.
The single player campaign for Gears will likely be the more interesting despite having the greater amount of uncomfortable macho bullshit, but there's a near 100% chance Reach is going to blow Gears away in the multiplayer which is where I'd spend the most time. I'll have to go with Reach though I probably won't be picking up either game.
There is speculation for customization for gears 3, we just don't know yet. Maybe its better to wait for more info before making a purchase.The Austin said:
Obviously it's going to be going like thus:TheButteryGoodness said:
Marcus Fenix fights bitterly against the crumbling Locust Empire, and the newly created Lambent faction, as all of Mankind does their best to avoid being pushed from the continent into the sea. As he fights in the ruins along the outskirts of Jacinto, many of his friends die, and players must make a terrible, and heartbreaking decision whether to kill Cole Train or not, as he is turning lambent. In the climax, Fenis sacrifices himself; killing both the Locust Queen and the Lambent's leader - his father.
LOL JK. You're just going to kill more bitchez and come out da winner.
They've promised a deeper storyer (Not that we should beleive what developers promise anymore) But even still, i'd rather kill people in gears with some nice highpower weaponry-fun. Rather than just run around with massive ammounts of health and shoot the same god damn aliens with guns that feel like your shooting squirt guns.TheButteryGoodness said:
Story matters a LOT to me, so I'm saying Gears. Halo Reach is a story we already know. In the end, Reach gets glassed and humanity has to fall back again. This is why I don't like prequels too much, because we already know how things have to end. Gears 3, however, will (hopefully) be answering some questions from Gears 2 and I want to see if I'm right about some things.
Don't get me wrong, I fully intend to get both, but if I had to choose, Gears wins. Now, if Bungie promised to have something at the end detailing how Master Chief gets back to Earth, then it might be a tougher choice...
Don't get me wrong, I fully intend to get both, but if I had to choose, Gears wins. Now, if Bungie promised to have something at the end detailing how Master Chief gets back to Earth, then it might be a tougher choice...
By using the same gameplay as Halo1, 2, 3, AND ODST?Daipire said:
Btw how does a game reclaim a throne from itself? Doesnt it already have its throne?
Id take Gears over Halo any day. Hopefully they fixed the mess that is Gears 2's multiplayer. I have such fond memories of Gears 1. It's quite sad really.
Neither, because they're both insipid turds.
AMENDMENT: Both of the series' preceding games were insipid turds.
AMENDMENT: Both of the series' preceding games were insipid turds.
*steals freinds* :S
Yeah, gears is gonna have customization supposably...The Austin said:
I dont udnerstand the point in customization when you never see your own character...
SenorFuzzeh said:
Well you could say the same things about gears 3. gears 1 was shooting bland looking aliens with big generic guns (few exceptions like the torque bow), and gears 2 was just more of the same. do you really belive that gears 3 will make any significant changes to the formula at this point?SenorFuzzeh said:
Eh, don't bother fighting with him. I doubt he's actually looked into any of it. Besides, the arguments against Halo can be used against Gears as well. Isn't there supposed to be a rule against starting a flame war?The Bandit said: