I'm not sure I agree with this one. I mean, in principle I agree with what you're saying about adapting something and the reworking of the ending was good but it's the details I have a problem with. De-emphasising the Comedian and Manhattan I think would be a mistake. Hell, along with Rorschach the Comedian was the best character in the movie. I actually think it was a great film but I can see why some people would be put off by the pacing.malestrithe said:Watchmen.
Not saying it is a bad movie, I'm saying that I'm not a fan. I did not pay money to see an almost 3 hour motion comic, and that is what I got. A true adaptation keeps the core of the story and change things around just enough for it to work in a new medium. They do not say "see this trade paperback? Well this is the script and the storyboard. Now, lets make this movie." Instead, or rather, they should say, "which parts of this movie feel like the A storyline? Which parts fill like a B, C or D storyline. Which parts do we simply do not need?
If I were to adapt it:
A Story: Rorschach's investigation. Keep the scenes where he uncovers the conspiracy, keep some of his downright evil acts and keep his death. Keep the diary scene at the end of the story. Get rid of his time in prison because it slows the story down. Get rid of the shrink wrap.
B Story: Nite Owl II's life in general. His relationship to Silk Spectre, Friendship with Ror
C Story: Ozymandias. This story need a villain.
D. Silk Spectre's life. Say she got out of a bad relationship and not mention who.
De-emphasize, Manhattan, Comedian, and everything else.
After that, I would write my version of the story.
When I adapt something, I do not go into projects thinking that the source material is sacred literature. I use it a guide to create my own version of the story, emphasizing the parts that make better narrative sense and removing or changing the parts the do not. But that also does not mean that I get to change everything. The characters should remain generally the same, but if the
Before anyone says it, allow me to rebut the common objection:
No, the giant squid does not count as a significant change. The comic book's ending does not make any sense without having to go into pages long defenses of it. And the defenses I've seen worked just as good if you substitute Dr. Manhattan for Giant Squid.
The movie's ending worked for version of the story that was told. Even Alan Moore said himself that he could not think of a better way to end it, so he opted for squid.
On topic I'd say Resident Evil could be turned into a pretty decent movie using the original storyline in a trimmed down form. Nothing groundbreaking but still a solid action movie.
And the Northern Lights deserves to be done some justice on screen I think after the butchering that was The Golden Compass.
Also I Am Legend. Seriously. How many attempts do we have to have before somebody thinks "actually the plotline is pretty awesome as it is. How about we don't fuck with it bar some minor tweaks so it makes sense in a modern setting."