"if you don't like America then you can git out!"

Recommended Videos

mightybozz

New member
Aug 20, 2009
177
0
0
Phanlix said:
Warning: This is a rant that contains political speech, a controversial one at that. I'd ask everyone to keep to the high path here and not devolve into endless bickering and cheap hate speech. But hey it is politics so I guess I might as well have never written that at all.

And so it begins...

I've been seeing a sudden re-emergence of this fantastic line of reasoning lately, and it's taking a serious toll on my sanity, so I had to write this piece in order to vent a bit of the frustration I feel.



First off the whole arguement of "if you don't like it then get out" is so fundamentally ****-tardedly flawed that I feel a little piece of what little belief of humanity's intelligence I have left die every time I hear it.

Logistics: It's difficult to emigrate, it takes time, money, and it's like moving to a new town where nobody knows you, but in addition to that they may not even speak the language (of course that's getting dodgy here in the US too, but we'll get to that later).

Second: We were founded by a group of people who largely (well with the exception of good Ol' Benjie) had no freaking clue how to run a country, so they just borrowed everything that was to become America from Rome, and made the rest up as they went along. This worked well only because they were largely self-made intellectuals, unlike those that we find leading our country right now. Cause you know anyone that's actually intelligent scares off the average voter, which is why white male landowners should really be the only ones to vote (hell yea sexism, racism, and bigotry in one statement, and it's a quote from our founding fathers... rock on).

Thirdly: When you don't like what the country is doing you are forced to change its policies from within, it's your damn duty as a patriot to do so. It's why our Constitution was made with provisions to change aspects of it. It's why our founding fathers decided that freedom of speech was so important. Hell the concept of Democracy was founded to put elected officials in place that mirrors their voters own expectations, and to represent policies they want to have in place.

Fourth: I'm not saying America is totally bad, America does a number of things right.

Democracy (representative democracy, not true democracy, there is a difference google it)... well that's not working out because our elected officials are becoming inherently corrupt. On top of that they are becoming indecisive, making choices they feel will benefit them politically instead of the choices we want them to make (I'm looking at you Barrack). I can only imagine what it's like to hear the constant chattering of small-interest groups, while the majority that elected you remains silent... it must be unnerving, but the greatest leaders have been ones with an iron will (and a generous heart).

Um free-market enterprise... oh wait now the unbridled corruption of a purely free market has been tried, and there were unsafe labor conditions, ridiculous hours, child labor, indentured servitude, and ultimately product that could kill you. But hey that's just in the food industry, don't even get me started on railroad companies, or the mining industry. That was of course in the days before government regulation. Regulation we're lead to believe, by the same people that make this stupid quote, as 'dangerous'. Of course today we have the shining examples of Enron, and others to show how 'great' a free market enterprise is.

Let's see... we've done freedoms fairly well, oh wait speech has always been impeded and in the days of McCarthyism outright outlawed (oh yea and Abraham Lincoln toyed with the idea of outlawing free speech too), and multiple types of prohibition on things we damn well know can kill us but don't care are still in place?

I can almost see the comments being written now... comments like "FREE MARKET ENTERPRISE!!!!111!! IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN IT UR A COMMIE! YOUR A RACIST, YOU DON'T BELIEVE BLACKS/WOMEN/HOMELESS PEOPLE/TRAILER PARK PEOPLE SHOULD VOTE?!?!?! THAT'S WRONG!

Of course there could be slightly more intelligent comments of "they changed voting rights for a reason...", or "free market enterprise inspires people to do the best they can based on the fact that they will be richly rewarded for their hard work and effort" being written. But these would be off-topic as the title clearly states "if you don't like America then you can git out!" ;-)

Lol, anywho... I have an answer for both of these. The first, is that I made the comment (about white landowners) to further state that change is good, and people that were decidedly against what the government was doing, people like the good Dr. (if you're paying attention in February at all you know who I'm talking about), strove to change. Sure he could have moved to another country where he wouldn't be persecuted, but he decided to stay, fight, and make this country just a little bit better. The second... free market enterprise is flawed and has proven it cannot work for a society that wants to sustain itself. The auto industry is a good example. And as far as people being inspired solely on monetary gain, is quite simply... greed. As Gandhi said "The world can provide all people's needs, but not all that they greed" (sic).



Okay so I've gone thoroughly off topic... *sigh* there's just so much to be pissed about right now...
I wish I had time for a proper response. You have my sympathies in all of the above. Just don't come to the UK because we're tragically moving closer to the US model. Especially in terms of politicians who don't give a shit. Tragic when you think of the glorious politicians of the past, whose careers meant something
 

BehattedWanderer

Fell off the Alligator.
Jun 24, 2009
5,237
0
0
Bretty said:
BehattedWanderer said:
So...Thomas Hobbes, John Calvin, Niccolo Machiavelli, Descartes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were not used as a platform of studied and contemporary works for Thomas Jefferson, among others? One wonders what this mindless bubbling rant is really about, since it starts to fall apart right around the beginning of your...er...babble. Congratulations, you have an opinion about the current president, and how he doesn't hold up to your expectations from your history class? And an extremely jaded one at that, if your rant at all reflects your education...
And Niccolo Machiavelli is really a good source for someone creating a Gov't?

Good rant, I liked it 8) but the guy I quoted obviously didn't....

Sounds like he had a little rant of his own! So cute.

I dont like his rant, hence the quote.
Pshaw. That, a rant? Bah! That was a blurb, at best, I just happen to be quite wordy in my mannerisms and questions, no matter how full of rhetoric they may be. Were I to rant, I would see the phrase "AUGH WALL OF TEXT!!" repeated ad humorum, or ad nauseum for people who cannot stand those simple derisive posts. That I muse in text my opinions on such things is there really to amuse or entertain those of similar mind, note denote some poor fellow for being a silly about himself. No no, my dear friend, that was nothing akin to a rant, but merely a short little anecdote that crossed my mind as I read the topic, and the post therein.

Bretty said:
And Niccolo Machiavelli is really a good source for someone creating a Gov't?
Oh, and before I forget about that little bit, I'd like to bring up both Plato and Hobbes, both of whom had a profound, phenomenal impact on the creation of practically every new political document since their respective times, and both generally viewed quite favorably. But, let us not forget, they were extremely tyrannical in their own rights. Plato thought the world should only be ruled by the philosopher kings, because the people who were too ignorant to concieve the greater meanings and workings of life should have no place ruling the world, a thought I agree to with most of my being. Hobbes would say that people on their own are brutish, mean, nasty, unpleasant, greedy, selfish pissants (I'm paraphrasing a bit, and believe me on this, I'm actually being much nicer in my language than he was in his) who would sooner watch the world burn to the ground for a dollar than try and help it for the same price. Both said that the common people should be supressed, and kept way the hell out of politics in the first place, and believed strongly in the concept of autocratic democracy. Rousseau's no less guilty of this, he's just a little less verbose, and Machiavelli is practically joyful compared to some of Plato's more cynical writings.

JaredXE said:
Actually...yes! Machiavelli is always downplayed as a schemer and a liar, which he was, but the whole point of his teachings and philosophy were to keep someone in power and how to deal with those whom you govern and those who wish to usurp your rule. I find that VERY important to know when setting your own government.


Edit: Oh yeah, and I am a big fan of Thomas Jefferson. Did you know he proposed that every generation we should destroy the Constitution and draw up a new one? And at the same time, forgive the National Debt? It was so the next generation would not be burdened by the screw-ups of the past. That our country could be governed by a living, changing document that we adjust to suit our current needs, as well as the means to run our government without worrying who owed whom.
Oh, whoo, another fan? Ooooh, and one who has had the good fortune of having studied? I'm amazed, I hadn't expected to hear that side of things in a rant thread. I tip my hat to you, sir, for your well-timed counter point for both the gentlemen you mentioned above.
 

snugglerotunda15

New member
Aug 25, 2009
12
0
0
Dude this rant was awesome im only 14 and I love this frickin(pg)country i will admit it has flaws like u said but its still the best in the world think about it this is like the only country where there hasnt been killins over power and so forth everybody should grateful as hell( pg-13)
Phanlix said:
Warning: This is a rant that contains political speech, a controversial one at that. I'd ask everyone to keep to the high path here and not devolve into endless bickering and cheap hate speech. But hey it is politics so I guess I might as well have never written that at all.

And so it begins...

I've been seeing a sudden re-emergence of this fantastic line of reasoning lately, and it's taking a serious toll on my sanity, so I had to write this piece in order to vent a bit of the frustration I feel.



First off the whole arguement of "if you don't like it then get out" is so fundamentally ****-tardedly flawed that I feel a little piece of what little belief of humanity's intelligence I have left die every time I hear it.

Logistics: It's difficult to emigrate, it takes time, money, and it's like moving to a new town where nobody knows you, but in addition to that they may not even speak the language (of course that's getting dodgy here in the US too, but we'll get to that later).

Second: We were founded by a group of people who largely (well with the exception of good Ol' Benjie) had no freaking clue how to run a country, so they just borrowed everything that was to become America from Rome, and made the rest up as they went along. This worked well only because they were largely self-made intellectuals, unlike those that we find leading our country right now. Cause you know anyone that's actually intelligent scares off the average voter, which is why white male landowners should really be the only ones to vote (hell yea sexism, racism, and bigotry in one statement, and it's a quote from our founding fathers... rock on).

Thirdly: When you don't like what the country is doing you are forced to change its policies from within, it's your damn duty as a patriot to do so. It's why our Constitution was made with provisions to change aspects of it. It's why our founding fathers decided that freedom of speech was so important. Hell the concept of Democracy was founded to put elected officials in place that mirrors their voters own expectations, and to represent policies they want to have in place.

Fourth: I'm not saying America is totally bad, America does a number of things right.

Democracy (representative democracy, not true democracy, there is a difference google it)... well that's not working out because our elected officials are becoming inherently corrupt. On top of that they are becoming indecisive, making choices they feel will benefit them politically instead of the choices we want them to make (I'm looking at you Barrack). I can only imagine what it's like to hear the constant chattering of small-interest groups, while the majority that elected you remains silent... it must be unnerving, but the greatest leaders have been ones with an iron will (and a generous heart).

Um free-market enterprise... oh wait now the unbridled corruption of a purely free market has been tried, and there were unsafe labor conditions, ridiculous hours, child labor, indentured servitude, and ultimately product that could kill you. But hey that's just in the food industry, don't even get me started on railroad companies, or the mining industry. That was of course in the days before government regulation. Regulation we're lead to believe, by the same people that make this stupid quote, as 'dangerous'. Of course today we have the shining examples of Enron, and others to show how 'great' a free market enterprise is.

Let's see... we've done freedoms fairly well, oh wait speech has always been impeded and in the days of McCarthyism outright outlawed (oh yea and Abraham Lincoln toyed with the idea of outlawing free speech too), and multiple types of prohibition on things we damn well know can kill us but don't care are still in place?

I can almost see the comments being written now... comments like "FREE MARKET ENTERPRISE!!!!111!! IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN IT UR A COMMIE! YOUR A RACIST, YOU DON'T BELIEVE BLACKS/WOMEN/HOMELESS PEOPLE/TRAILER PARK PEOPLE SHOULD VOTE?!?!?! THAT'S WRONG!

Of course there could be slightly more intelligent comments of "they changed voting rights for a reason...", or "free market enterprise inspires people to do the best they can based on the fact that they will be richly rewarded for their hard work and effort" being written. But these would be off-topic as the title clearly states "if you don't like America then you can git out!" ;-)

Lol, anywho... I have an answer for both of these. The first, is that I made the comment (about white landowners) to further state that change is good, and people that were decidedly against what the government was doing, people like the good Dr. (if you're paying attention in February at all you know who I'm talking about), strove to change. Sure he could have moved to another country where he wouldn't be persecuted, but he decided to stay, fight, and make this country just a little bit better. The second... free market enterprise is flawed and has proven it cannot work for a society that wants to sustain itself. The auto industry is a good example. And as far as people being inspired solely on monetary gain, is quite simply... greed. As Gandhi said "The world can provide all people's needs, but not all that they greed" (sic).



Okay so I've gone thoroughly off topic... *sigh* there's just so much to be pissed about right now...
 

daxter101

New member
Aug 17, 2009
53
0
0
guess who said:
daxter101 said:
You have to challenge the flaws in a countrys system, and you have to question a leaders ideals, however no matter how far your country falls you should never hate it.
Why not, a country is just a patch of land with different rules and sometimes weather than another one. If that place becomes crap why not give it the one finger salute and find somewhere better.
Its a little word called loyalty
 

guess who

New member
Jan 22, 2009
129
0
0
daxter101 said:
guess who said:
daxter101 said:
You have to challenge the flaws in a countrys system, and you have to question a leaders ideals, however no matter how far your country falls you should never hate it.
Why not, a country is just a patch of land with different rules and sometimes weather than another one. If that place becomes crap why not give it the one finger salute and find somewhere better.
Its a little word called loyalty
Yes but why should one be loyal to a country, what purpose dose it serve to be loyal to some arbitrary patch of land?
 

SadakoMoose

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2009
1,200
0
41
I've always said that America's economy should just cop out and start imitating Germany.
They're doing pretty well.
Imagine if Germany's economic policies were employed in a country the size of the United States, with a huge GDP. It'd be like having an America sized Germany, that runs on gasoline and puts ketchup on everything.
With a really big, well funded, army...
...
Watch out, everyone else...
 

Random Argument Man

New member
May 21, 2008
6,011
0
0
SplicedUp068 said:
Git: Git is the Hillbilly's term for "get". It can be used for any sentences with the word "get". It just makes it sounds a little less intelligent and a hell of a lot more confusing.
 

DRADIS C0ntact

New member
Mar 26, 2009
306
0
0
Have you ever heard this quote? I'm not sure who came up with it, but it's relatively well known. Google it if you want to find the author. It goes like this:

A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.

From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.

The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years.

During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:
1. From bondage to spiritual faith
2. From spiritual faith to great courage
3. From courage to liberty
4. From liberty to abundance
5. From abundance to complacency
6. From complacency to apathy
7. From apathy to dependence
8. From dependence back into bondage


Several books that I've read have used this quote to describe the current downward spiral that America is in. I'm not sure exactly which step I would say that the country is in, but to make an educated guess, I would say we're nearing the bottom.
 

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
The meaning of that saying doesn't mean to actually "get out" it just means "Leave me alone, you liberal idiots, we should drill in Alaska, go to war with Iraq, and not educate our kids in place of making them hulking and stupid football players." It's a patriotic-right wing saying. And I agree with it. As I'm a Christian, Right Wing, Patriotic person who believes Bush was right to send us in to Iraq. I'm not in the mood for flame wars, so please just scroll on down if you don't agree.
 

Rooster Cogburn

New member
May 24, 2008
1,637
0
0
All this trouble stems from one problem- institutionalized theft and murder. If all you do is mind your own business, nonetheless persons whom you have never made contract with, and to whom you have incurred no debt will demand tribute from you on pain of death, and use it to great evil. Eliminate these ills, and all this becomes a moot point. Join the Counter-Economy, and eliminate these ills.

http://agorism.info/
 

Rolling Thunder

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,265
0
0
Rooster Cogburn said:
All this trouble stems from one problem- institutionalized theft and murder. If all you do is mind your own business, nonetheless persons whom you have never made contract with, and to whom you have incurred no debt will demand tribute from you on pain of death, and use it to great evil. Eliminate these ills, and all this becomes a moot point. Join the Counter-Economy, and eliminate these ills.

http://agorism.info/
God, not another anarchist. It's not as if the system even damn well works, let alone would create anything similar to the free market. In case you haven't noticed, every economist, intellectual, thinker and anyone half-sane for the past three centuaries has noted that for the existence of any economic activity beyond the primitive level, you need law and order. At least regular anarchists understood this, unlike these new idiots.