If you had proof that God didn't exsist, would you show the world?

Recommended Videos

Biek

New member
Mar 5, 2008
1,629
0
0
I'd carry the secret on me for some time untill I figure out how to handle the shitstorm it's gonna stir up. IF its truely undeniable then this evidence will cause a revolution. I'd need to figure out how to make it through (alive) and how to possibly benefit from it.

Secondly, Id need to make sure it stays out of the hands of other parties who would use it for their own benefit. Imagine what would happen if the church of scientology got hold of the evidence?
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
cuddly_tomato said:
Actually, you are the one in denial. I have a theory...

Homophobia has often been attributed to people who have some homosexual feelings but can't come to terms with them. They hate that aspect of themselves, and turn it on others who are gay. If you are truly comfortable with heterosexuality or your homosexuality then the sexual preferences of others shouldn't bother you. It is only when you have a problem with your own sexuality you turn into a bigoted ass towards others.

I believe theophobia (hatred of religion/religious people) is much the same. I don't believe in god, but I am comfortable with that. It's a personal thing that I don't feel the need to pontificate about or scream about. I don't insult or belittle those who think differently and I can freely accept them for who they are. Others can't. Others have to scream and shout about how 'bad' religion is, much the same way as homophobic people have to scream and shout about how gay people destroy everything they touch.

There are other similarities. Much like homosexuality, belief is not a choice, it is a state of mind/being. Much like homosexuality, it is something that reaches into the very core of someone, and something that some people feel shame about (even though they shouldn't). And much like homosexuality, religion is something that can cause people to be outcast from social groupings of various sorts during childhood and adolescence.

A lot of the antitheist ranters around here are probably believers, but simply hate themselves for it.
You REALLY wanna go down that road again don't you? ...Fine... For someone who preaches accepting other people's opinion you sure as fuck can't accept mine... Which ironically would be saying a lot based on your theory.

Your theory is wrong however. I'm not saying there are no people who do that, there's stupid people in every "group", atheists included. I have, SEVERAL times before explained my reasons for hating religion. I have a religious background, which I promptly told to go fuck itself once I realized it was all a giant con.

Now, the "cardinal sin" of your theory is that you're comparing two things that can't be compared: homosexuality and religion.

Homosexuality has to do with taste. I prefer strawberries, that guy prefers kiwis. I prefer tits, that guy prefers penises. It's partially genetic, partially development related, as any other "taste" or attraction. I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation as to why I prefer blond women and why some other guy likes dudes with a beard, but who the fuck cares? Me kissing or fucking, or anything in between with a girl or a guy affects nobody else in the slightest, ok? if today, the ENTIRE world became gay, nothing wrong would happen so long as we kept having "straight sex" for reproductive reasons. You can't say it's wrong, or right, it's a taste, a preference. You're not saying the rest of the world is wrong for liking anything else.

Religion, on the other hand, is all about "I'm right, based on nothing, so live your lives according to me".
Now, from the very basis religion is wrong, because it demotes, nay, downright forbids critical thinking and learning in general. See, if you look at the sky and see thunder, science will tell you "hey, wonder what causes this? Let's investigate!", while religion tells you "God. Nnono, don't go questioning things... God did it. Now go pray.". If science hadn't came along and said "heeeeeeeey... fuck that... I'm going to figure out how that works... see ya" you'd still be living in houses made of rocks and hay, with a life expectancy of 35-40 years if you were lucky and working on the lord's backyard for a piece of bread a day. EVEN TODAY, ok, even today, religion is the cause we're not as developed as we could be.
So, from that point alone I start to despise it.

Something else I have a big issue with: lies.
I -HAAAAAAAAAAAAAATE- lies, they're the fabric drama and disaster are made of. Religion is entirely based on lies, on telling people "hey! Follow our rules or some mystic guy in space will make you suffer forever". It's based on "what you can't see won't hurt you" mentality. Guess what, it will. A lot. Denial is a variation of a lie, it's lying to yourself, which again is something I hate, BUT, not only because it's pathetic but because it causes problems. If you're too deep in denial (and these people are) to see the real issues, you'll never prepare for them. It promotes people being mentality weak, taking cover under the "god" shell whenever things go wrong. Never having to face things. That alone is pathetic, except these people keep insisting everyone ELSE has to live the way they like. Again, kind of a big issue here.

But we're not done.
Another thing I have an issue with is inconsistency. And religions are very inconsistent.
What proofs does anyone have god exist? Hallucinations don't count. None. There are exactly as many proofs Jesus, God, Allah, Zeus, Xenu, or whatever deity of your choice, existed as there are that Darth Vader, the Easter Bunny, Bilbo Baggins, and Commander James T. Kirk actually existed. None. Not one. Why, then, do these hypocrites will have no issue saying these other fictional characters don't exist (which is fine, because they don't), but that their fictional character is real because it's better or something... News flash: Lord of the Rings has a better story than the Bible and I sure as fuck respect J.R.R. Tolkien more than whomever wrote that overwritten piece of plot-hole ridden tripe (if I had to guess, a very ancient ancestor of Hideo Kojima, hurr durr). But I'm not going to start praying to Sauron, or Gandalf and I sure as fuck don't think they exist. Same way the idea "god" exists is ridiculous.

You know that ironic quote, making fun of atheism? "First there was nothing, then it exploded", implying we don't really know what came before the big bang, and that something HAD to? The irony being, no scientist with half a brain ever said the big bang was the absolute begging, but that's as far back as we can extrapolate. Maybe one day we'll be able to go further back, don't know. Religion's answer to that, ironically, is "First there was nothing, then someone made everything in a week". Right, that's a much better explanation.

Another thing I have issues with is weakness. Being pathetic. And religion is nothing if not pathetic.
It's the weak,praying on the weaker, exploiting Man's inherent primal, survival based, fear of death and nonexistence, because no matter how bad any afterlife is, at least you exist, and even existing in eternal pain is better than not existing at all. People taking cover under the comfortable but fake cloak of denial, dragging us all along with them.

See, while homosexuality has absolutely no bad influence in society, religion undermines science, thinking, psychological development and the ability to deal with problems, halts development (social and personal), is the cause of more death than -EVERY- natural disaster on earth combined, promotes discrimination, praying on the weak, etc, etc.

And to top it ALL off, I only present my views when: a) People ask for it (like, say, in a forum made to discuss people's views...)or b) when these same religious fucknuggets try, again, to impose their views on other people.

So my hate for religion isn't unfounded, and my post isn't uncalled for. Now, can we drop it or do you just have a necessity to argue with me?
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,404
0
0
Caliostro said:
cuddly_tomato said:
Actually, you are the one in denial. I have a theory...

Homophobia has often been attributed to people who have some homosexual feelings but can't come to terms with them. They hate that aspect of themselves, and turn it on others who are gay. If you are truly comfortable with heterosexuality or your homosexuality then the sexual preferences of others shouldn't bother you. It is only when you have a problem with your own sexuality you turn into a bigoted ass towards others.

I believe theophobia (hatred of religion/religious people) is much the same. I don't believe in god, but I am comfortable with that. It's a personal thing that I don't feel the need to pontificate about or scream about. I don't insult or belittle those who think differently and I can freely accept them for who they are. Others can't. Others have to scream and shout about how 'bad' religion is, much the same way as homophobic people have to scream and shout about how gay people destroy everything they touch.

There are other similarities. Much like homosexuality, belief is not a choice, it is a state of mind/being. Much like homosexuality, it is something that reaches into the very core of someone, and something that some people feel shame about (even though they shouldn't). And much like homosexuality, religion is something that can cause people to be outcast from social groupings of various sorts during childhood and adolescence.

A lot of the antitheist ranters around here are probably believers, but simply hate themselves for it.
You REALLY wanna go down that road again don't you? ...Fine... For someone who preaches accepting other people's opinion you sure as fuck can't accept mine... Which ironically would be saying a lot based on your theory.
I would have no problem with your opinion, if you presented it as an opinion. You do not do that, you state it as a fact and then say that anyone who disagrees is wrong. That kind of thing tends to get peoples backs up. Such as...

Caliostro said:
I have a religious background, which I promptly told to go fuck itself once I realized it was all a giant con.
--snip---
Something else I have a big issue with: lies.
I -HAAAAAAAAAAAAAATE- lies, they're the fabric drama and disaster are made of. Religion is entirely based on lies, on telling people "hey! Follow our rules or some mystic guy in space will make you suffer forever". It's based on "what you can't see won't hurt you" mentality. Guess what, it will. A lot. Denial is a variation of a lie, it's lying to yourself, which again is something I hate, BUT, not only because it's pathetic but because it causes problems. If you're too deep in denial (and these people are) to see the real issues, you'll never prepare for them. It promotes people being mentality weak, taking cover under the "god" shell whenever things go wrong. Never having to face things. That alone is pathetic, except these people keep insisting everyone ELSE has to live the way they like. Again, kind of a big issue here.

But we're not done.
Another thing I have an issue with is inconsistency. And religions are very inconsistent.
What proofs does anyone have god exist? Hallucinations don't count. None. There are exactly as many proofs Jesus, God, Allah, Zeus, Xenu, or whatever deity of your choice, existed as there are that Darth Vader, the Easter Bunny, Bilbo Baggins, and Commander James T. Kirk actually existed. None. Not one. Why, then, do these hypocrites will have no issue saying these other fictional characters don't exist (which is fine, because they don't), but that their fictional character is real because it's better or something... News flash: Lord of the Rings has a better story than the Bible and I sure as fuck respect J.R.R. Tolkien more than whomever wrote that overwritten piece of plot-hole ridden tripe (if I had to guess, a very ancient ancestor of Hideo Kojima, hurr durr). But I'm not going to start praying to Sauron, or Gandalf and I sure as fuck don't think they exist. Same way the idea "god" exists is ridiculous.
QED. =P

Caliostro said:
You know that ironic quote, making fun of atheism? "First there was nothing, then it exploded", implying we don't really know what came before the big bang, and that something HAD to? The irony being, no scientist with half a brain ever said the big bang was the absolute begging, but that's as far back as we can extrapolate. Maybe one day we'll be able to go further back, don't know. Religion's answer to that, ironically, is "First there was nothing, then someone made everything in a week". Right, that's a much better explanation.
Ahhh. That Big Bang thing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre].

Caliostro said:
Another thing I have issues with is weakness. Being pathetic. And religion is nothing if not pathetic.
It's the weak,praying on the weaker, exploiting Man's inherent primal, survival based, fear of death and nonexistence, because no matter how bad any afterlife is, at least you exist, and even existing in eternal pain is better than not existing at all. People taking cover under the comfortable but fake cloak of denial, dragging us all along with them.

See, while homosexuality has absolutely no bad influence in society, religion undermines science, thinking, psychological development and the ability to deal with problems, halts development (social and personal), is the cause of more death than -EVERY- natural disaster on earth combined, promotes discrimination, praying on the weak, etc, etc.
Well [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Alexander], the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Barrow] problem [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Collins_(geneticist)] is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_T._Bakker] your [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archbishop_Damaskinos] opinions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_O%27Flaherty] are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Lichtenberg] not [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1ra_Salkah%C3%A1zi] founded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omelyan_Kovch] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_and_Magda_Trocm%C3%A9] objectivity [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximilian_Kolbe#Auschwitz] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Delp] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_de_Jong] fact [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Chagas_Filho]. As soon as you match the contributions of any one of those individuals then feel free to continue giving your bigoted edicts. Or as soon as you can show that those people are not religious or did horrendous things then also, you may continue to act like an asshole without me calling you out on it. Your views are founded on nothing more than your own hatred. So either you are someone with a grudge against religion or you are someone who is religious at heart and hates himself for it. The fact you call religious people up the wall so much, as opposed to the particulars of certain religious practices, makes me think it is the latter.
 

Fingerprint

Elite Member
Oct 30, 2008
1,297
0
41
deathsong17 said:
If I had undeniable truth I would show it to world PURLEY because they tried to force me into Cristianity through constant propoganda in Primary school.
To me that seems a childish reason but to my discredit it's the exact same reason I'd use
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
cuddly_tomato said:
Well [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Alexander], the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Barrow] problem [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Collins_(geneticist)] is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_T._Bakker] your [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archbishop_Damaskinos] opinions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_O%27Flaherty] are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Lichtenberg] not [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1ra_Salkah%C3%A1zi] founded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omelyan_Kovch] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_and_Magda_Trocm%C3%A9] objectivity [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximilian_Kolbe#Auschwitz] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Delp] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_de_Jong] fact [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Chagas_Filho]. As soon as you match the contributions of any one of those individuals then feel free to continue giving your bigoted edicts. Or as soon as you can show that those people are not religious or did horrendous things then also, you may continue to act like an asshole without me calling you out on it. Your views are founded on nothing more than your own hatred. So either you are someone with a grudge against religion or you are someone who is religious at heart and hates himself for it. The fact you call religious people up the wall so much, as opposed to the particulars of certain religious practices, makes me think it is the latter.
You and me, we'll never get along. Your views are found on ignorance and pseudo-psychology, you keep struggling in circles trying to make me look bad but you never prove anything yourself. Yes, some religious people have done good things, but it's because they were good people, it's because they would have done it anyways without religion... They didn't do it in the name of god, they did it to help a fellow man... They've done a few bad things too (inquisition, holy wars, book burning, etc). Notice the funny thing, the good things are generally done by a person, individually, while the bad things are done by a mass in name of their religion. Overall the bad they've done outweighs the good they did. You can't disprove anything I said, because it can be proven. Religion demands blind faith to support itself, faith denies logic and rational thinking, everything else is consequence.

And yes, I know there are "religious" scientists, and I also know that they're hypocrites. They don't really believe in it, nobody REALLY does, they just wanna pretend they do.

And please, don't try to use pseudo-psychology on me, psychology is my area.
 

Glerken

New member
Dec 18, 2008
1,539
0
0
Yes, and I would than go up to the pope and yell "I TOLD YOU SO" right in his face.
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Caliostro said:
cuddly_tomato said:
Well [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Alexander], the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Barrow] problem [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Collins_(geneticist)] is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_T._Bakker] your [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archbishop_Damaskinos] opinions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_O%27Flaherty] are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Lichtenberg] not [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1ra_Salkah%C3%A1zi] founded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omelyan_Kovch] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_and_Magda_Trocm%C3%A9] objectivity [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximilian_Kolbe#Auschwitz] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Delp] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_de_Jong] fact [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Chagas_Filho]. As soon as you match the contributions of any one of those individuals then feel free to continue giving your bigoted edicts. Or as soon as you can show that those people are not religious or did horrendous things then also, you may continue to act like an asshole without me calling you out on it. Your views are founded on nothing more than your own hatred. So either you are someone with a grudge against religion or you are someone who is religious at heart and hates himself for it. The fact you call religious people up the wall so much, as opposed to the particulars of certain religious practices, makes me think it is the latter.
You and me, we'll never get along. Your views are found on ignorance and pseudo-psychology, you keep struggling in circles trying to make me look bad but you never prove anything yourself. Yes, some religious people have done good things, but it's because they were good people, it's because they would have done it anyways without religion... They didn't do it in the name of god, they did it to help a fellow man... They've done a few bad things too (inquisition, holy wars, book burning, etc). Notice the funny thing, the good things are generally done by a person, individually, while the bad things are done by a mass in name of their religion. Overall the bad they've done outweighs the good they did. You can't disprove anything I said, because it can be proven. Religion demands blind faith to support itself, faith denies logic and rational thinking, everything else is consequence.

And yes, I know there are "religious" scientists, and I also know that they're hypocrites. They don't really believe in it, nobody REALLY does, they just wanna pretend they do.

And please, don't try to use pseudo-psychology on me, psychology is my area.
Psychology is your area, yet you claim anyone with a bit of faith is ignorant and in denial?

That's really not an opinion, that's a hate speech against religious people. An ignorant one, seeing as belief has been since the beginning of the first civilizations.


On topic: I would show it to the world. After I made hundreds of copies, just in case. Because I'm a jerk and I like breaking people's dreams and hopes.
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
Abedeus said:
Psychology is your area, yet you claim anyone with a bit of faith is ignorant and in denial?
Because they are. Or not ignorant and just in denial. One of them. That's what faith is for.

Abedeus said:
That's really not an opinion, that's a hate speech against religious people. An ignorant one, seeing as belief has been since the beginning of the first civilizations.
That's neither. That's a fact. Study psychological behavior and you'll see it.

And yeah, in the beginning they used to say lightning came from enraged gods and that the earth was flat... "Thank god" we know they didn't really know what they were talking about right?

You know the irony, when Nicolaus Copernicus, you might have heard the name, said "hey guys, turns out the planet isn't the center of the universe." they said he was full of it. When one Charles Darwin said "hey guys, we weren't born from clay and whatnot...we involved from other species", he was a blasphemer! Hate speech!

Turns out science has been right over religion every step of the way. Wonder if that means anything.
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,404
0
0
Caliostro said:
cuddly_tomato said:
Well [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Alexander], the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Barrow] problem [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Collins_(geneticist)] is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_T._Bakker] your [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archbishop_Damaskinos] opinions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_O%27Flaherty] are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Lichtenberg] not [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1ra_Salkah%C3%A1zi] founded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omelyan_Kovch] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_and_Magda_Trocm%C3%A9] objectivity [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximilian_Kolbe#Auschwitz] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Delp] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_de_Jong] fact [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Chagas_Filho]. As soon as you match the contributions of any one of those individuals then feel free to continue giving your bigoted edicts. Or as soon as you can show that those people are not religious or did horrendous things then also, you may continue to act like an asshole without me calling you out on it. Your views are founded on nothing more than your own hatred. So either you are someone with a grudge against religion or you are someone who is religious at heart and hates himself for it. The fact you call religious people up the wall so much, as opposed to the particulars of certain religious practices, makes me think it is the latter.
You and me, we'll never get along. Your views are found on ignorance and pseudo-psychology, you keep struggling in circles trying to make me look bad but you never prove anything yourself. Yes, some religious people have done good things, but it's because they were good people, it's because they would have done it anyways without religion... They didn't do it in the name of god, they did it to help a fellow man... They've done a few bad things too (inquisition, holy wars, book burning, etc). Notice the funny thing, the good things are generally done by a person, individually, while the bad things are done by a mass in name of their religion. Overall the bad they've done outweighs the good they did. You can't disprove anything I said, because it can be proven. Religion demands blind faith to support itself, faith denies logic and rational thinking, everything else is consequence.

And yes, I know there are "religious" scientists, and I also know that they're hypocrites. They don't really believe in it, nobody REALLY does, they just wanna pretend they do.

And please, don't try to use pseudo-psychology on me, psychology is my area.
Ohhh right....

When people do good things they do it because they are good.

When people do bad things they do it because of religion.

And I am the one with views founded on ignorance?

You, Caliostro, have proved nothing in your entire time. You have done nothing but make ignorant hate speeches against people who do not share your views, like Phelps does whenever someone explains that being gay isn't a bad thing at all. You have been presented with evidence that contradicts you various evangelisms, and just flatly ignore it like a creationist does when presented with the bones of our ancestors. You claim religious scientists are hypocrites, while you believe something yourself without proof or evidence for its existence. You talk of religion being a source of hate and division, while you yourself speak of hating religions and saying they should be destroyed.

You are the very thing you claim to despise. No wonder you are filled with such hate, your mind must be a mass of conflicting feelings on this issue. My advice, forget all about religion for a while. Learn something about life and love and philosophy and history, then return too it all on your own terms, with a peaceful mind and an objective eye. Until then you will only be a dogmatic fanatic.
 

Deadarm

New member
Sep 8, 2008
346
0
0
Actually it wouldn't be that hard to prove wether or not god/heaven/hell/satan exist, all you need are shock paddles and a stopwatch.

Personally I think god may or may not exist but I will never know since I am both hypocritical and have a complete lack of morals.
 

iJosh

New member
Nov 21, 2007
1,453
0
0
I would tell the world, But how would one scrandoms opinion make the god believers change their beliefs.?
 

The-Big-D

New member
Feb 4, 2008
411
0
0
I would use it as an excuse to piss off the Phelps family at the Westboro Baptist Church.
Just watch carnage unfold as i sit there and laugh at there retarded views.
 

Deadarm

New member
Sep 8, 2008
346
0
0
You know, I think that I may have a decent example of tomato's idea. I was forced to be a mormon by my mother and I now hate anyone who is involved with religion.
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
CIA said:
Nah. I would use that knowledge to crate a loyal cult who would follow my nefarious bidding.
This. Only not terribly nefarious. But I'd have them do stuff like kick cats. And pet dogs.
 

jlrogers

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1
0
0
Its interesting to note that religion has been the cause of much of that "war and chaos" already. :D
 

PureChaos

New member
Aug 16, 2008
4,990
0
0
no, some people like believing there is someone watching over them. i wouldn't want to destroy that for those that need it.