If you had to have sex with someone...
- Thread starter pppppppppppppppppp
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I notice the OP wrote "gender" rather than "sex", which gives me the loophole to choose someone transgender. (That is, someone who is physically female but identifies as male.)
...
Or I can just say this is a silly thread, and refuse to answer.
...
Or I can go with David Tennant or John Barrowman, just because they're sexy devils.
...
Or I can just say this is a silly thread, and refuse to answer.
...
Or I can go with David Tennant or John Barrowman, just because they're sexy devils.
being bi makes this all the more easier. the obvious choice for me is either Neil Patrick Harris or one of those models you see in swimsuits at wal mart. you seen those guy? BIG, and i like big o3o . as for NPH, have you seen that guy with his shirt off? mmmmmm, and he's got kids so i KNOW he'd be a gentle, sweet, passionate lover.
TMI?
TMI?
Well yes, thank you, that's only the premise of the thread. It's asking "Of the group of people you'd rather not have sex with, who do you consider to be the most tolerable option?". It's not implying that you want to, or that you do. Wonderful, you're heterosexual, bully for you. That's nothing to do with the topic, however. You are simply misunderstanding the question.rhizhim said:
And as for everything else you said, what the heck are you talking about? No one said anything about a captor. That's not the Socratic Exercise you were given.
All that's been given is this; You have to have sex with someone of the gender you aren't attracted to. That's the situation. No getting out of it besides killing yourself. Tricking people isn't an option. In this situation, there's no other people who have to it. Just you. Those are the terms everyone is answering on. You can't "propose" another way. That's not what the thread is about. If you don't want to answer, then don't post in the gosh-darn thread.
The point of the thread is that it's irregardless of who you want to have sex with, answering it doesn't mean you actually want to have sex with the named person.
These kids today just jumping straight to sex, where is the romance? A little cuddle maybe?ninjaRiv said:
But if I have to have sex with another man with no romance it's going to have to be a story that is epic in it's telling...Tim Curry or John Waters.
Jenson Button. Without doubt the sexiest man alive, and nothing, nothing is more attractive than a racing driver.
[sub]I'm really not gay... honest.[/sub]
[sub]I'm really not gay... honest.[/sub]
You HAVE to have sex with someone because that's the conditions given in the hypothetical and you are given the choice because it's just a thread and it doesn't have to be logical.rhizhim said:
And as for your skittles torture example, yeah, that would be a good, funny answer to that question. But it's not what you are doing. What you are doing is equivalent to being asked what you want to be tortured with and answering by saying "I don't want to be tortured so I use space kung-fu to escape."
It's sort of pointless. We know you don't want to abide by the hypothetical. But you have to, for the sake of it.
And yes, you could just refuse to answer, but in that case, why post at all? Just refuse to answer instead of electing to answer in a very silly way.
And as for me taking this too seriously, well... Yeah. I am. But, still.
