The mods are pretty lenient as long as you don't directly insult anyone or say something cartoonishly evil.
No, it's not illegal. My best guess is that it's a sponsorship thing. Some ad company that helps finance the Escapist or its parent companies probably gives them an extra bonus if they encourage not using blockers, and putting moderator action against them is a good way to do that. PM someone at the Tech Group or part of the staff, they might tell you.Jasper van Heycop said:I don't get why admitting to adblocking is wrong, it isn't illegal as far as I know?TheYellowCellPhone said:They're called Red Guard mostly as a joke. I never made that connection about Cultural Revolution China until you just mentioned it, and I've been on these forums for four years now.
It's the same as other forums. Don't post spam links, don't post entirely hostile messages (or shitposts), refrain from posting NSFW stuff unless it's with fair warning and behind a link. The only thing The Escapist does different, rule-wise, is take action against low content posts (less than ten words), confessions of ad-blockers, and better worded hostile posts.
Most of the things are down to the probation system. Myself, I am on the edge of a temporary ban, followed by an actual ban. Because yeah, I have been abrasive.sretsoorder said:I notice you guys are banning an awful lot of people. I've just joined, though at times I've lurked topics that catch my eye, and upon reading the User's Guide to the Forums, apparently titled very aptly from what I've seen, the mods' word is law, and they're... they're called the Red Guards? You mean like those guys who ran around China beating up intellectuals under Mao?
I had to check myself to see if I wasn't back in 2010-era 4chan. Haven't been back there since the Great Crisis of Boxxy, so my memory is a little foggy, but I see a lot of similarities, moderation-wise. I see people getting banned for completely random posts, and the classic "user was banned for this post" and accompanying gif. I saw people get banned for implying that certain kinds of music would be hard to dance to, and another banned for saying that a person prejudiced their target audience.
Well, their word is law. User will probably be banned for this post, but while we're still here, talk to me about whether or not this is actually as bad as it looks.
I agree. So long as you are aware that certain topics are going to attract certain nutcases and that it is the internet so you really can't take anything too seriously; then this place is lovely.Hero of Lime said:I prefer it like this, I hate to think what this place would be like without our kind(and good looking might I add) mods. We are free to say lots of stuff on here and we can be allowed to be a bit combative without being reprimanded. Of course I come here to talk about games, post on forum games, and just have some fun replying to threads. Do that, and the mods will never bother you.
No it doesn't get you around it, there's a famous example somewhere that I've lost the link for, but a 2 word post followed by "now to add words to pad it out to avoid moderation" will almost certainly be hammered.thaluikhain said:Er, it's not really that big of a deal.
OTOH, I could post something deliberately inflammatory, such as "people who are on unemployment benefits for more than 5 years should have their organs harvested", and the people who call me a terrible person would be the ones getting modded.
And the low content rules strikes me as foolish, as simply adding more words without more information gets around it.
The Escapist makes it's money on advertising and thus the rules forbid the endorsement of ad blocking programs.Jasper van Heycop said:I don't get why admitting to adblocking is wrong, it isn't illegal as far as I know?TheYellowCellPhone said:They're called Red Guard mostly as a joke. I never made that connection about Cultural Revolution China until you just mentioned it, and I've been on these forums for four years now.
It's the same as other forums. Don't post spam links, don't post entirely hostile messages (or shitposts), refrain from posting NSFW stuff unless it's with fair warning and behind a link. The only thing The Escapist does different, rule-wise, is take action against low content posts (less than ten words), confessions of ad-blockers, and better worded hostile posts.
you are right they dont matter and i could also ask why do they get angry?McMullen said:Seriously? I've never felt anything of the sort here. Why would you feel intimidated by angry people on the Internet? Especially if they're angry at your opinions? Those people don't matter.carlsberg export said:I think it a shame because I don't know about anyone else here, but you can sometimes feel intimidated to post an opinion or point for fear of getting your head bitten off.
OT: I've had a few warnings, some for legitimate reasons, some for things I didn't actually do. The most recent was something that other people did not get warnings for, and judging from the response to my appeal it was probably just a new-ish mod enjoying his little taste of power.
It's true that some of the modding decisions are pretty shameful, but it's not really that hard to stay out of trouble. Don't make posts that are less than 10 words (they don't care about the content, just the word count; you can post a meaningless essay and it'll be fine), don't be a jerk, and don't advocate piracy or adblockers.
I'm assuming you're talking Jim Sterling on the latter one, but where did the former happen?sretsoorder said:I saw people get banned for implying that certain kinds of music would be hard to dance to, and another banned for saying that a person prejudiced their target audience.
I'm not seeing a lot of people banned who don't look like they deserve it. Maybe it's just the way I frequent the forums.User will probably be banned for this post, but while we're still here, talk to me about whether or not this is actually as bad as it looks.
I've seen a few, but it doesn't seem like it should be enough to cause a panic.Daystar Clarion said:There's a lot of people getting suspended, but I've hardly seen any bans.
It's really not that hard to add discussion value, which is what they ostensibly want.carnex said:I have problem with "short post" arbitrary rule. Got warning for saying "Jones in the Fast Lane" on realistic games thread. It's a name of really realistic game I enjoyed over a decade ago. And I get warning. And it's not the first time, but last time it was revoked when I contacted admins. This time I was completely ignored.
As a foaming lunatic, I resent that!Deshara said:I got put on probation cause the picture I posted in a "what's behind the avatar?" thread was a picture of Aang's back.
Yeah, the mods are kind of overzealous, but I guess it's the price to pay for a forum that lacks foaming lunatics.
Yeah, all those rumours about the "internship" programs are just that. Rumours.Phrozenflame500 said:Don't be scared, the mods aren't all neo-nazis who kidnap the people they ban, disfigure their faces, cut off their fingertips and force them to work in their editing offices. Im sorry! Please dont beat me again!
I've done that with a post about Timesplitters. I believe I put something like: 'TIMESPLITTERS NOW PLZ K THNX BAI' with some other words thrown in as a futile attempt to avoid wrath. It didn't work so now I'm plotting against them.SkarKrow said:No it doesn't get you around it, there's a famous example somewhere that I've lost the link for, but a 2 word post followed by "now to add words to pad it out to avoid moderation" will almost certainly be hammered.thaluikhain said:Er, it's not really that big of a deal.
OTOH, I could post something deliberately inflammatory, such as "people who are on unemployment benefits for more than 5 years should have their organs harvested", and the people who call me a terrible person would be the ones getting modded.
And the low content rules strikes me as foolish, as simply adding more words without more information gets around it.
OP; if you don't want to be banned just read the code of conduct and try to play nice, don't get drawn into flame wars, if you somebody pisses you off or keeps repeating themselves and saying nothing beyond you're wrong then ignore them. Also; the rules also apply to user groups.
What thread was this? Sounds kind of interesting.Signa said:I've decided to just say my piece and then get out. If people quote me looking for a fight, I just let it slide. I got quoted 5 times for something I said in a thread recently, and each was trying to throw the gauntlet down. I actually for the first time ever, put some one on my ignore list after that.