Moonlight Butterfly said:
Firstly I don't know why having ovaries makes you a different gamer. Secondly gaming does not belong to men. Yes the devs often cater to lads over women because of demographic but that does not mean they have some sort of divine right that makes their opinion more valid.
No, it doesn't. In fact, in current western society, I'm pretty sure nothing "belongs to men" -- that's a right that only belongs to women. Will elaborate below.
Moonlight Butterfly said:
You see when someone says 'How dare people like (insert woman here) come into our hobby and tell us what's wrong with it! They are doing two things. They are claiming gaming as some sort of medium that only belongs to them and they are depriving someone of the right to an opinion just because they are female.
It's more like "How dare people come into our hobby and tell us what's wrong with it!" I'm not exactly sure why someone like Anita Sarkeesian should be expected to get any different of a reception than Jack Thompson. Is telling everyone who pulls a "we demand your hobby be changed to meet my preferences" being treated identically regardless of what those preferences *are* or who is saying them the absolute height of egalitarianism? There were certainly no kind words given regarding Jack Thompson either, though they had a different tilt to them since pejoratives are inherently demographically sensitive (but with a bit of a look you can find some pretty horrible things directed at him too, and he's even a presumably straight white male so he should get treated with the utmost respect and not massive amounts of bile, vitriol, and outright hatemongering, right? Oh, no, wait, it's the internet.).
DevilWithaHalo said:
That?s not actually how I see it represented, which is the fundamental failure in the communication of the two sides. They see it as someone coming into a hobby they?re enjoying and telling them something is wrong with it. The difference is quite subtle, but there is a difference nonetheless. Surely you can understand where the reaction comes from? I certainly don't want someone telling me I shouldn't enjoy something because they don't like how they interpret it.
If they shared their opinion as an opinion, I don?t think the problem would be as escalated as it is. The problem is that people who share their opinions publicly aren?t representing them as opinion; they?re representing them as fact.
Something like that, yeah.
Moonlight Butterfly said:
Also there is some sort of reaction of 'Why don't you go off and make your own games! Instead of asking men to do it for you.' This works on the assumption that all developers are male and the only people who are allowed to have an opinion about games are people who make them (if that was true forums like this wouldn't exist.)
DevilWithaHalo said:
It?s a valid response to be honest. Nothing is preventing them from creating their own companies and competing in the open market by creating games they feel better represent their positions.
Actually, given that the marginal cost of creating games for PC is really quite low if anyone with the underlying skills is interested (and the one for writing is just a shade higher than nothing) and things like Kickstarter exist, it's a really good argument. More diversity is in what is available is always better. Trying to force everyone else to do what you want at the cost of other things isn't. If there's a niche for it, it'll open some eyes, especially given how easy it is to get a game on Desura, though somewhat harder to get one on Steam or Origin.
Moonlight Butterfly said:
Lastly the existence of female cons like 'Geek Girl Con' do not prove that 'men should be allowed to exclude women too' They are only there because women feel like they cannot be part of the main scene. If you look at pictures of those cons, sure they aren't as busy as the main cons but there is a significantly different amount of women you see there and in the pictures from the main cons. That is disturbing to me. It suggests that women feel like the main gaming cons aren't relevant or just plain hostile to them.
This hits on one of those things that I think is inherently problematic, that I can blame on feminism specifically (because of the position it holds in gender discourse and the underlying framing of the discussion), and something that I think actually influences the genuinely misogynist edge of the whole argument (as opposed to people who simply don't want their hobby trampled to meet someone else's taste, or perhaps just plain disagree with you). "Women's Space." It's defined by feminists and based on men, that is to say, that the term as discussed in feminism essentially is space in which men are not welcome, and thus solely for women. Perfectly reasonable description for something that certainly needs to exist in some form.
What becomes problematic is that the same people then turn around and define anything from which men are not explicitly excluded as "Men's space." Which is not exactly the same thing. So, for example, a public mall in the eyes of these people is "men's space" because men aren't barred from being there, but isn't "women's space" because men aren't barred from being there, depsite women not being barred from it either.
I'm going to refer to this concept (space that is not restricted anyone on the basis of gender) as "ungendered space" for simplicity, and use "Men's space" to refer to a gender-flipped version of "Women's space."
Women's space is sacrosanct, and gets treated as such. The idea that women's space needs to exist and is important to have and protect is essentially unquestioned. Men's space however is essentially vilified, and is something that needs to be turned into ungendered space, kicking and screaming if need be. As a result, there is very little that qualifies as men's space these days, and anyone attempting to create such is a sexist, misogynist, probably homophobic monster; or a den of pedophiles. Let me put it this way: Pre-PAX women-only (but otherwise publicly accessible) party = awesome idea; Men-only (but otherwise publicly accessible) LAN party = misogynist asshole. So yeah, I'm going to guess the few who *actually* view it as encroaching on a space "belonging to men" do so out of a lack of other such spaces.
KP Shadow said:
I've always been somewhat apathetic towards the whole "Girl gamer" thing, but, from what I can tell, there are two types:
The "Gamer Girl", or the camwhore who pretends to be into games for attention.
And the girl gamer, who is just that. A girl who plays video games.
And, yeah, there is quite a bit of sexism in gaming. It's a really disappointing fact, and it really needs to go away, but there's no way we can just make it disappear overnight. Just try to fight it, and reduce the problem as much as you can. And make sure to always discuss it logically (Which you have, for the most part). Nobody likes it when someone's acting like they have a Gundam up their ass, even if they are, for the most part, in the right.
It's like the "men are pedophiles, so let's have a policy in which we throw them out of their seat on an airline if we decided to sit them next to an unaccompanied child to begin with" thing (thanks Virgin for such a great recent example). Sure, some of them are (and some "Gamer Girls" are just doing ti for attention), but they're a minority. They're just large enough of a minority to be in people's minds, and just problematic enough to stick there, though. Thankfully gaming isn't nearly so serious as sexual abuse, but that just sets the bar for "problematic enough" lower.
Moonlight Butterfly said:
I'm not depressed about video games I'm depressed about the attitude towards my gender. Sometimes I think it would be easier to be a guy.
Norah Vincent tried, you can read about her experiences easily enough. Or listen to her interview on NPR July of last year. It's really an interesting series of experiences on her part.
Toilet said:
What I don't like is that when men create their own space where they can be away from women there is an immediate uproar. Some dudes just want an area or an activity where there is no women not for sexist reasons but for their own well being because everyone needs a break from the opposite gender. Women have their own safe spaces and their own activities so why cant we?
I just don't like how we must accommodate women for everything; I want a mens only video game club where I can relax, make crude comments and rape jokes, play video games and drink with other dudes. Some men aren't comfortable around women; they can suffer from anxiety, turn into competitive assholes trying to impress the girl or whiteknights.
Just don't make a big deal out of it everyone can play games.
Phasmal said:
You want a video game club like that, go make one.
Problem is when some dudes try and turn the whole thing into a guys club when it really isn't and nor should it be.
Games are a medium of entertainment. They're not a dude thing. Not a lady thing. They're just a thing.
I'm not asking to be `accomodated`, especially not when I've been here the whole damn time (longer than a bunch of the dudes who think gaming is `theirs`). Just asking people not generally be fuckheads. Do it privately!
If you wanna get your own mumble server for being as rude as you like on, I would support that 100%.
See above about gendered spaces. =)
Elate said:
If you don't like normal events, sure make your own, but don't then segregate them based on gender, just have less booth babes.
So...PAX, then? They cretainly haven't held up to *no* booth babes, but they can certainly claim *less* booth babes.
Trilligan said:
Note, again, that the nature of those attacks had absolutely nothing to do with her credibility. They had to do with her gender. It was a massive misogynist shitstorm, because she was trying to compile the very evidence that Devil wanted to see. I thought it relevant to the discussion, as it speaks to the mindset of the specific element of gamer culture I was talking about, and it serves as an example to edify those who try to say that sexism in gaming isn't an important problem to address. I never once said anyone here was misogynist because they didn't think Sarkeesian was credible, nor for any other reason.
Also note that she literally incited it. She posted her video on YouTube (funny that she ran that Kickstarter for a month and didn't post the video on YouTube until near the end, isn't it? That's usually the first ting these people trying to raise money do), pre apologized for the shitstorm she was about to receive, then heavily spammed 4chan.